From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
WANG Chao <chaowang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] kexec: Provide an option to use new kexec system call
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:59:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140827075936.GA5936@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140826143034.GD9081@redhat.com>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:30:34AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:22:32AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is v2 of the patch. Since v1, I moved syscall implemented check littler
> > earlier in the function as per the feedback.
> >
> > Now a new kexec syscall (kexec_file_load()) has been merged in upstream
> > kernel. This system call takes file descriptors of kernel and initramfs
> > as input (as opposed to list of segments to be loaded). This new system
> > call allows for signature verification of the kernel being loaded.
> >
> > One use of signature verification of kernel is secureboot systems where
> > we want to allow kexec into a kernel only if it is validly signed by
> > a key system trusts.
> >
> > This patch provides and option --kexec-file-syscall (-s), to force use of
> > new system call for kexec. Default is to continue to use old syscall.
> >
> > Currently only bzImage64 on x86_64 can be loaded using this system call.
> > As kernel adds support for more arches and for more image types, kexec-tools
> > can be modified accordingly.
> >
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> Do you have any concerns with this patch? If not, can you please consider
> it for merge.
Thanks, applied.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-27 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-18 15:22 [PATCH V2] kexec: Provide an option to use new kexec system call Vivek Goyal
2014-08-19 9:15 ` Baoquan He
2014-08-26 14:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-27 7:59 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2014-08-27 13:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-27 14:04 ` Simon Horman
2014-08-27 14:15 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140827075936.GA5936@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chaowang@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox