From: "bhe@redhat.com" <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
Cc: "dyoung@redhat.com" <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Atsushi Kumagai <ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com>,
"louis.bouchard@canonical.com" <louis.bouchard@canonical.com>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Makedumpfile PATCH V2 2/4] x86_64: translate all VA to PA using page table values
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 22:25:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161209142515.GB6875@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3d3fcf63-eb95-9adb-b645-9f906d5f900f@redhat.com>
On 12/09/16 at 03:40pm, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > > - page_dir = SYMBOL(init_level4_pgt);
> > > + page_dir = SYMBOL(init_level4_pgt) - __START_KERNEL_map + phys_base;
> >
> > I found that this change breaks the backward compatibility for
> > kernel 2.6.21 or older since phys_base was introduced in kernel 2.6.22
> > by the commit below:
> >
> > commit 1ab60e0f72f71ec54831e525a3e1154f1c092408
> > Author: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
> > Date: Wed May 2 19:27:07 2007 +0200
> >
> > [PATCH] x86-64: Relocatable Kernel Support
> >
> > There is no problem if phys_base is always 0 in older kernel, but
> > get_phys_base_x86_64() calculates "phys_base = 0x100000" from my vmcore:
This is really awkward. Checked code, found PAGE_OFFSET is
0xffff810000000000 before 2.6.26, then changed to 0xffff880000000000
after that. Can we check the page_offset calculated from pt_load
segments, meanwhile check if has VMCOREINFO and osrelease after 2.6.21.
With both of above condition, we could set phys_vase to 0. Not sure if
this can solve the existing problem.
> >
> > Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr
> > FileSiz MemSiz Flags Align
> > NOTE 0x0000000000000190 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
> > 0x0000000000000590 0x0000000000000590 0
> > LOAD 0x0000000000000720 0xffffffff80000000 0x0000000000100000 // CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START = 0x100000
> > 0x00000000008b2000 0x00000000008b2000 RWE 0
> > LOAD 0x00000000008b2720 0xffff810000000000 0x0000000000000000
> > 0x00000000000a0000 0x00000000000a0000 RWE 0
> > LOAD 0x0000000000952720 0xffff810000100000 0x0000000000100000
> > 0x0000000000f00000 0x0000000000f00000 RWE 0
> > LOAD 0x0000000001852720 0xffff810005000000 0x0000000005000000
> > 0x00000000caf70000 0x00000000caf70000 RWE 0
> > LOAD 0x00000000cc7c2720 0xffff810100000000 0x0000000100000000
> > 0x0000000070000000 0x0000000070000000 RWE 0
> >
> > Of course we shouldn't use that invalid phys_base:
> >
> > crash> sym init_level4_pgt
> > ffffffff80101000 (T) init_level4_pgt
> > crash> vtop ffffffff80101000
> > VIRTUAL PHYSICAL
> > ffffffff80101000 101000 // just "VIRTUAL - __START_KERNEL_map"
> >
> > PML4 DIRECTORY: ffffffff80101000
> > PAGE DIRECTORY: 103027
> > PUD: 103ff0 => 105027
> > PMD: 105000 => 1e3
> > PAGE: 0 (2MB)
> >
> > PTE PHYSICAL FLAGS
> > 1e3 0 (PRESENT|RW|ACCESSED|DIRTY|PSE|GLOBAL)
> >
> > PAGE PHYSICAL MAPPING INDEX CNT FLAGS
> > ffff810005004838 101000 0 0 1 400
> > crash>
> >
> > At first I thought about setting 0 to phys_base if the kernel is
> > older than 2.6.22, but unfortunately we can't get the kernel version
> > before getting correct phys_base since VtoP is necessary to read
> > system_utsname.
> > (and 2.6.21 doesn't have VMCOREINFO, OSRELEASE can't be used too.)
>
> We can use this fact may be. So, when has_vmcoreinfo() is false we can
> consider it as old kernel and can set phys_start as 0.
>
>
> Bao, any opnion?
>
> ~Pratyush
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-09 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-31 8:17 [Makedumpfile PATCH V2 0/4] x86_64: Fix page_offset for randomized base enabled Pratyush Anand
2016-10-31 8:17 ` [Makedumpfile PATCH V2 1/4] x86_64: Calculate page_offset from pt_load Pratyush Anand
2016-10-31 8:17 ` [Makedumpfile PATCH V2 2/4] x86_64: translate all VA to PA using page table values Pratyush Anand
2016-12-09 7:35 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2016-12-09 10:10 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-12-09 14:25 ` bhe [this message]
2016-12-10 1:29 ` bhe
2016-12-10 1:33 ` bhe
2016-12-10 6:20 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-12-12 8:40 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2016-12-12 9:50 ` bhe
2016-12-13 7:03 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2016-10-31 8:17 ` [Makedumpfile PATCH V2 3/4] x86_64: kill is_vmalloc_addr_x86_64() Pratyush Anand
2016-10-31 8:17 ` [Makedumpfile PATCH V2 4/4] x86_64: kill some unused initialization Pratyush Anand
2016-11-01 5:34 ` [Makedumpfile PATCH V2 0/4] x86_64: Fix page_offset for randomized base enabled Dave Young
2016-11-04 10:35 ` Atsushi Kumagai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161209142515.GB6875@x1 \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=louis.bouchard@canonical.com \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox