From: "bhe@redhat.com" <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
Cc: "dyoung@redhat.com" <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Atsushi Kumagai <ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com>,
"louis.bouchard@canonical.com" <louis.bouchard@canonical.com>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Makedumpfile PATCH V2 2/4] x86_64: translate all VA to PA using page table values
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 09:29:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161210012915.GA1034@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161209142515.GB6875@x1>
On 12/09/16 at 10:25pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 12/09/16 at 03:40pm, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > > > - page_dir = SYMBOL(init_level4_pgt);
> > > > + page_dir = SYMBOL(init_level4_pgt) - __START_KERNEL_map + phys_base;
> > >
> > > I found that this change breaks the backward compatibility for
> > > kernel 2.6.21 or older since phys_base was introduced in kernel 2.6.22
> > > by the commit below:
> > >
> > > commit 1ab60e0f72f71ec54831e525a3e1154f1c092408
> > > Author: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
> > > Date: Wed May 2 19:27:07 2007 +0200
> > >
> > > [PATCH] x86-64: Relocatable Kernel Support
> > >
> > > There is no problem if phys_base is always 0 in older kernel, but
> > > get_phys_base_x86_64() calculates "phys_base = 0x100000" from my vmcore:
>
> This is really awkward. Checked code, found PAGE_OFFSET is
> 0xffff810000000000 before 2.6.26, then changed to 0xffff880000000000
> after that. Can we check the page_offset calculated from pt_load
> segments, meanwhile check if has VMCOREINFO and osrelease after 2.6.21.
>
> With both of above condition, we could set phys_vase to 0. Not sure if
> this can solve the existing problem.
I meant making a judgement:
if (page_offset == 0xffff810000000000 && info->kernel_version > KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 21))
info->phys_base = 0;
>
> > >
> > > Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr
> > > FileSiz MemSiz Flags Align
> > > NOTE 0x0000000000000190 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000
> > > 0x0000000000000590 0x0000000000000590 0
> > > LOAD 0x0000000000000720 0xffffffff80000000 0x0000000000100000 // CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START = 0x100000
> > > 0x00000000008b2000 0x00000000008b2000 RWE 0
> > > LOAD 0x00000000008b2720 0xffff810000000000 0x0000000000000000
> > > 0x00000000000a0000 0x00000000000a0000 RWE 0
> > > LOAD 0x0000000000952720 0xffff810000100000 0x0000000000100000
> > > 0x0000000000f00000 0x0000000000f00000 RWE 0
> > > LOAD 0x0000000001852720 0xffff810005000000 0x0000000005000000
> > > 0x00000000caf70000 0x00000000caf70000 RWE 0
> > > LOAD 0x00000000cc7c2720 0xffff810100000000 0x0000000100000000
> > > 0x0000000070000000 0x0000000070000000 RWE 0
> > >
> > > Of course we shouldn't use that invalid phys_base:
> > >
> > > crash> sym init_level4_pgt
> > > ffffffff80101000 (T) init_level4_pgt
> > > crash> vtop ffffffff80101000
> > > VIRTUAL PHYSICAL
> > > ffffffff80101000 101000 // just "VIRTUAL - __START_KERNEL_map"
> > >
> > > PML4 DIRECTORY: ffffffff80101000
> > > PAGE DIRECTORY: 103027
> > > PUD: 103ff0 => 105027
> > > PMD: 105000 => 1e3
> > > PAGE: 0 (2MB)
> > >
> > > PTE PHYSICAL FLAGS
> > > 1e3 0 (PRESENT|RW|ACCESSED|DIRTY|PSE|GLOBAL)
> > >
> > > PAGE PHYSICAL MAPPING INDEX CNT FLAGS
> > > ffff810005004838 101000 0 0 1 400
> > > crash>
> > >
> > > At first I thought about setting 0 to phys_base if the kernel is
> > > older than 2.6.22, but unfortunately we can't get the kernel version
> > > before getting correct phys_base since VtoP is necessary to read
> > > system_utsname.
> > > (and 2.6.21 doesn't have VMCOREINFO, OSRELEASE can't be used too.)
> >
> > We can use this fact may be. So, when has_vmcoreinfo() is false we can
> > consider it as old kernel and can set phys_start as 0.
> >
> >
> > Bao, any opnion?
> >
> > ~Pratyush
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-10 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-31 8:17 [Makedumpfile PATCH V2 0/4] x86_64: Fix page_offset for randomized base enabled Pratyush Anand
2016-10-31 8:17 ` [Makedumpfile PATCH V2 1/4] x86_64: Calculate page_offset from pt_load Pratyush Anand
2016-10-31 8:17 ` [Makedumpfile PATCH V2 2/4] x86_64: translate all VA to PA using page table values Pratyush Anand
2016-12-09 7:35 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2016-12-09 10:10 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-12-09 14:25 ` bhe
2016-12-10 1:29 ` bhe [this message]
2016-12-10 1:33 ` bhe
2016-12-10 6:20 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-12-12 8:40 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2016-12-12 9:50 ` bhe
2016-12-13 7:03 ` Atsushi Kumagai
2016-10-31 8:17 ` [Makedumpfile PATCH V2 3/4] x86_64: kill is_vmalloc_addr_x86_64() Pratyush Anand
2016-10-31 8:17 ` [Makedumpfile PATCH V2 4/4] x86_64: kill some unused initialization Pratyush Anand
2016-11-01 5:34 ` [Makedumpfile PATCH V2 0/4] x86_64: Fix page_offset for randomized base enabled Dave Young
2016-11-04 10:35 ` Atsushi Kumagai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161210012915.GA1034@x1 \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=louis.bouchard@canonical.com \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox