Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: "Ramsay, Frank" <frank.ramsay@hpe.com>
Cc: "kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Support large number of memory ranges
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:44:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170324064412.GF1319@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CS1PR84MB01983072D64758E237736825833F0@CS1PR84MB0198.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:27:08PM +0000, Ramsay, Frank wrote:
> ________________________________________
> From: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:16:59 AM
> To: kexec@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: Dave Young; Xunlei Pang; Ramsay, Frank
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: Support large number of memory ranges
> 
> We got a problem on one SGI 64TB machine, the current kexec-tools
> failed to work due to the insufficient ranges(MAX_MEMORY_RANGES)
> allowed which is defined as 1024(less than the ranges on the machine).
> The kcore header is insufficient due to the same reason as well.
> 
> To solve this, this patch simply doubles "MAX_MEMORY_RANGES" and
> "KCORE_ELF_HEADERS_SIZE".
> 
> Cc: Frank Ramsay <frank.ramsay@hpe.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
> 
> acking I tested this
> Tested-by: Frank Ramsay <frank.ramsay@hpe.com>

Thanks, applied.

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

      reply	other threads:[~2017-03-24  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-23 11:16 [PATCH] x86: Support large number of memory ranges Xunlei Pang
2017-03-23 13:27 ` Ramsay, Frank
2017-03-24  6:44   ` Simon Horman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170324064412.GF1319@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=frank.ramsay@hpe.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox