* kdump in upstream kexec-tools @ 2018-04-17 4:50 Bhupesh Sharma 2018-04-17 9:01 ` Russell King 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Bhupesh Sharma @ 2018-04-17 4:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: rmk, kexec, Simon Horman, ebiederm Cc: khalid.aziz, AKASHI Takahiro, Bhupesh SHARMA, Dave Young, Vivek Goyal Hi, I was working on improving documentation/structure of the upstream kexec-tools and I was wondering what is the purpose of the 'kdump' directory inside the kexec-tools. This kdump utility seems to cause confusion with the 'kdump' utility present inside some distributions (for e.g. '/usr/sbin/kdump' present inside fedora) due to the same naming convention and so we should populate/modify the kdump man page to indicate the same, so as to avoid confusion. Presently here are the contents of this directory: # ls kdump/ kdump.8 kdump.c Makefile - Out of these the kdump man documentation (kdump.8) is just a placeholder as suggested by the man page documentation: "kdump - This is just a placeholder until real man page has been written" - Looking at kdump.c : 1. I understand that this code is mainly used to read a crashdump from memory. One can run the same using: # kdump <start_addr> where start_addr is basically the start address of the core dump (which can also be represented via the 'elfcorehdr' environment variable being passed to the crash kernel which represents the physical address of the start of the ELF header) 2. This tool needs READ_ONLY access to /dev/mem (so we need to set CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM configuration option accordingly). 3. The code thereafter reads (via mmap) and verifies the ELF header. Subsequently it reads (via mmap) the program header. 4. Then we collect all the notes and write on STDOUT all the headers and notes found in the crashdump collected from memory. So, as per my understanding even in absence of (more powerful) tools like crash (or gdb), we can still go ahead and read the crashdump from memory and display all the headers and notes present in the same on standard serial out interface using this kdump utility. This is probably a good to have feature for systems which have very simple/minimal rootfs (and I see that a few arm32 systems seem to use the same as well) or are low on memory availability. Now, I wanted to confirm if the 'kdump' utility for reading crashdump collected from memory is still needed (as the last commit is dated back to 2016 and was done for arm32 systems). If yes, I can go ahead and enhance the kdump man page to include the description given above - so that it helps users understand how to run the tool. Please share your opinions. Regards, Bhupesh _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: kdump in upstream kexec-tools 2018-04-17 4:50 kdump in upstream kexec-tools Bhupesh Sharma @ 2018-04-17 9:01 ` Russell King 2018-04-17 10:50 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2018-04-18 13:01 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Russell King @ 2018-04-17 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bhupesh Sharma Cc: khalid.aziz, kexec, AKASHI Takahiro, Simon Horman, ebiederm, Bhupesh SHARMA, Dave Young, Vivek Goyal On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:20:08AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > Hi, > > I was working on improving documentation/structure of the upstream > kexec-tools and I was wondering what is the purpose of the 'kdump' > directory inside the kexec-tools. > > This kdump utility seems to cause confusion with the 'kdump' utility > present inside some distributions (for e.g. '/usr/sbin/kdump' present > inside fedora) due to the same naming convention and so we should > populate/modify the kdump man page to indicate the same, so as to > avoid confusion. > > Presently here are the contents of this directory: > > # ls kdump/ > kdump.8 kdump.c Makefile > > - Out of these the kdump man documentation (kdump.8) is just a > placeholder as suggested by the man page documentation: "kdump - This > is just a placeholder until real man page has been written" > > - Looking at kdump.c : > > 1. I understand that this code is mainly used to read a crashdump from > memory. One can run the same using: > > # kdump <start_addr> > > where start_addr is basically the start address of the core dump > (which can also be represented via the 'elfcorehdr' environment > variable being passed to the crash kernel which represents the > physical address of the start of the ELF header) > > 2. This tool needs READ_ONLY access to /dev/mem (so we need to set > CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM configuration option accordingly). > > 3. The code thereafter reads (via mmap) and verifies the ELF header. > Subsequently it reads (via mmap) the program header. > > 4. Then we collect all the notes and write on STDOUT all the headers > and notes found in the crashdump collected from memory. > > So, as per my understanding even in absence of (more powerful) tools > like crash (or gdb), we can still go ahead and read the crashdump from > memory and display all the headers and notes present in the same on > standard serial out interface using this kdump utility. > > This is probably a good to have feature for systems which have very > simple/minimal rootfs (and I see that a few arm32 systems seem to use > the same as well) or are low on memory availability. > > Now, I wanted to confirm if the 'kdump' utility for reading crashdump > collected from memory is still needed (as the last commit is dated > back to 2016 and was done for arm32 systems). If yes, I can go ahead > and enhance the kdump man page to include the description given above > - so that it helps users understand how to run the tool. > > Please share your opinions. Firstly, please use: git://git.armlinux.org.uk/~rmk/kexec-tools.git for ARM systems - this has some important fixes that aren't in the mainline repository. I think the kdump tool is dead. It only supports the 64-bit ELF format, and 32-bit ARM can either be 32-bit ELF or 64-bit ELF format coredumps, depending whether LPAE is enabled. I've asked questions about this, and not got anywhere, so I now recommend not using that tool. Have you checked whether objcopy can copy the coredump from /proc/vmcore to the filesystem? That would permit saving of the coredump image for later inspection by gdb. -- Russell King _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: kdump in upstream kexec-tools 2018-04-17 9:01 ` Russell King @ 2018-04-17 10:50 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2018-04-17 12:51 ` Russell King 2018-04-18 13:01 ` Simon Horman 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Bhupesh Sharma @ 2018-04-17 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Russell King Cc: khalid.aziz, kexec, AKASHI Takahiro, Simon Horman, ebiederm, Bhupesh SHARMA, Dave Young, Vivek Goyal On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Russell King <rmk@armlinux.org.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:20:08AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was working on improving documentation/structure of the upstream >> kexec-tools and I was wondering what is the purpose of the 'kdump' >> directory inside the kexec-tools. >> >> This kdump utility seems to cause confusion with the 'kdump' utility >> present inside some distributions (for e.g. '/usr/sbin/kdump' present >> inside fedora) due to the same naming convention and so we should >> populate/modify the kdump man page to indicate the same, so as to >> avoid confusion. >> >> Presently here are the contents of this directory: >> >> # ls kdump/ >> kdump.8 kdump.c Makefile >> >> - Out of these the kdump man documentation (kdump.8) is just a >> placeholder as suggested by the man page documentation: "kdump - This >> is just a placeholder until real man page has been written" >> >> - Looking at kdump.c : >> >> 1. I understand that this code is mainly used to read a crashdump from >> memory. One can run the same using: >> >> # kdump <start_addr> >> >> where start_addr is basically the start address of the core dump >> (which can also be represented via the 'elfcorehdr' environment >> variable being passed to the crash kernel which represents the >> physical address of the start of the ELF header) >> >> 2. This tool needs READ_ONLY access to /dev/mem (so we need to set >> CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM configuration option accordingly). >> >> 3. The code thereafter reads (via mmap) and verifies the ELF header. >> Subsequently it reads (via mmap) the program header. >> >> 4. Then we collect all the notes and write on STDOUT all the headers >> and notes found in the crashdump collected from memory. >> >> So, as per my understanding even in absence of (more powerful) tools >> like crash (or gdb), we can still go ahead and read the crashdump from >> memory and display all the headers and notes present in the same on >> standard serial out interface using this kdump utility. >> >> This is probably a good to have feature for systems which have very >> simple/minimal rootfs (and I see that a few arm32 systems seem to use >> the same as well) or are low on memory availability. >> >> Now, I wanted to confirm if the 'kdump' utility for reading crashdump >> collected from memory is still needed (as the last commit is dated >> back to 2016 and was done for arm32 systems). If yes, I can go ahead >> and enhance the kdump man page to include the description given above >> - so that it helps users understand how to run the tool. >> >> Please share your opinions. > > Firstly, please use: > > git://git.armlinux.org.uk/~rmk/kexec-tools.git > > for ARM systems - this has some important fixes that aren't in the > mainline repository. Ok. Thanks for the pointer. > I think the kdump tool is dead. It only supports the 64-bit ELF > format, and 32-bit ARM can either be 32-bit ELF or 64-bit ELF format > coredumps, depending whether LPAE is enabled. I've asked questions > about this, and not got anywhere, so I now recommend not using that > tool. Sure, so if this is not really needed may be I can send out a patch to remove the 'kdump/' directory from the upstream 'kexec-tools', as it causes confusion when compared to similarly named distribution specific kdump service/utilities. @Simon - Please share if you see any other use-cases, that depend on the 'kdump/' utility in the upstream 'kexec-tools'. AFAIK, this tool is mainly used to obtain an ELF file which contains information about the PT_NOTE and PT_LOAD segments within the crashdump read from the memory. For e.g I use this tool on my arm64 board as follows: a. Read out the 'elfcorehdr' env variable passed to the crash kernel and pass the same as an argument to the tool: Assuming that the 'elfcorehdr' spans the range -> 0xffdf0000-0xffdf13ff, launch the tool as - # kdump Cannot find the start of the core dump # kdump 0xffdf0000 >> output_elf_file # file output_elf_file output: ELF 64-bit LSB core file ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV) # readelf -a --wide output_elf_file > read_output_elf_file # less read_output_elf_file ELF Header: Magic: 7f 45 4c 46 02 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Class: ELF64 Data: 2's complement, little endian Version: 1 (current) OS/ABI: UNIX - System V ABI Version: 0 Type: CORE (Core file) Machine: AArch64 </snip/> .. There are no sections to group in this file. Program Headers: Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align NOTE 0x000740 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 0x000000 0x000000 0 LOAD 0x000740 0xffff2472f6ae0000 0x00000008b10e0000 0x18a0000 0x18a0000 RWE 0 LOAD 0x18a0740 0xffff800000620000 0x0000000000820000 0x2860000 0x2860000 RWE 0 LOAD 0x4100740 0xffff800002e90000 0x0000000003090000 0x170000 0x170000 RWE 0 LOAD 0x4270740 0xffff800003210000 0x0000000003410000 0x4030000 0x4030000 RWE 0 LOAD 0x82a0740 0xffff800007280000 0x0000000007480000 0x120000 0x120000 RWE 0 </snip/> .. > Have you checked whether objcopy can copy the coredump from > /proc/vmcore to the filesystem? That would permit saving of the > coredump image for later inspection by gdb. Yes, let me detail the sequence of steps taken when I use the Fedora distribution specific kdump service and utilities. When the primary kernel crashes: 1. If the crashkernel is loaded, then the system starts executing the kdump kernel. 2. When the boot process gets to the point when kdump service is started, the crashdump core is usually copied out to disk (for e.g. inside '/var/crash') using 'cp' command from '/proc/vmcore' (please see <https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/kdump/kdump.txt#L463>): # cp /proc/vmcore <dump-file> 3. Thereafter the system is rebooted back into the normal kernel. 4. Once back to your normal kernel, one can use the crashdump core available on hard disk in conjunction with the previously installed kernel (with debuginfo) to perform postmortem analysis with tools like gdb/crash. (please see <https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/kdump/kdump.txt#L472>): # gdb vmlinux <dump-file> Regards, Bhupesh _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: kdump in upstream kexec-tools 2018-04-17 10:50 ` Bhupesh Sharma @ 2018-04-17 12:51 ` Russell King 2018-04-17 17:43 ` Bhupesh Sharma 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Russell King @ 2018-04-17 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bhupesh Sharma Cc: khalid.aziz, kexec, AKASHI Takahiro, Simon Horman, ebiederm, Bhupesh SHARMA, Dave Young, Vivek Goyal On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 04:20:00PM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > For e.g I use this tool on my arm64 board as follows: > > a. Read out the 'elfcorehdr' env variable passed to the crash kernel > and pass the same as an argument to the tool: > > Assuming that the 'elfcorehdr' spans the range -> > 0xffdf0000-0xffdf13ff, launch the tool as - > > # kdump > Cannot find the start of the core dump > > # kdump 0xffdf0000 >> output_elf_file > > # file output_elf_file > output: ELF 64-bit LSB core file ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV) The contents should basically be the same (possibly with a different section ordering) as /proc/vmcore in the crashdump kernel. If so, kdump serves no useful purpose, and ends up confusing the situation due to its inability to handle 32-bit ELF coredump files. It seems to me that the presence of /proc/vmcore obsoletes the kdump tool. -- Russell King _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: kdump in upstream kexec-tools 2018-04-17 12:51 ` Russell King @ 2018-04-17 17:43 ` Bhupesh Sharma 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Bhupesh Sharma @ 2018-04-17 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Russell King Cc: kexec, AKASHI Takahiro, Simon Horman, ebiederm, Bhupesh SHARMA, Dave Young, Vivek Goyal On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Russell King <rmk@armlinux.org.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 04:20:00PM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >> For e.g I use this tool on my arm64 board as follows: >> >> a. Read out the 'elfcorehdr' env variable passed to the crash kernel >> and pass the same as an argument to the tool: >> >> Assuming that the 'elfcorehdr' spans the range -> >> 0xffdf0000-0xffdf13ff, launch the tool as - >> >> # kdump >> Cannot find the start of the core dump >> >> # kdump 0xffdf0000 >> output_elf_file >> >> # file output_elf_file >> output: ELF 64-bit LSB core file ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV) > > The contents should basically be the same (possibly with a different > section ordering) as /proc/vmcore in the crashdump kernel. If so, > kdump serves no useful purpose, and ends up confusing the situation > due to its inability to handle 32-bit ELF coredump files. > > It seems to me that the presence of /proc/vmcore obsoletes the kdump > tool. Fair enough. I will send a patch shortly to remove the obsolete kdump tool from 'kexec-tools'. Thanks, Bhupesh _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: kdump in upstream kexec-tools 2018-04-17 9:01 ` Russell King 2018-04-17 10:50 ` Bhupesh Sharma @ 2018-04-18 13:01 ` Simon Horman 2018-04-18 18:28 ` Russell King 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2018-04-18 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Russell King Cc: khalid.aziz, Bhupesh Sharma, kexec, AKASHI Takahiro, ebiederm, Bhupesh SHARMA, Dave Young, Vivek Goyal On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:01:13AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:20:08AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was working on improving documentation/structure of the upstream > > kexec-tools and I was wondering what is the purpose of the 'kdump' > > directory inside the kexec-tools. > > > > This kdump utility seems to cause confusion with the 'kdump' utility > > present inside some distributions (for e.g. '/usr/sbin/kdump' present > > inside fedora) due to the same naming convention and so we should > > populate/modify the kdump man page to indicate the same, so as to > > avoid confusion. > > > > Presently here are the contents of this directory: > > > > # ls kdump/ > > kdump.8 kdump.c Makefile > > > > - Out of these the kdump man documentation (kdump.8) is just a > > placeholder as suggested by the man page documentation: "kdump - This > > is just a placeholder until real man page has been written" > > > > - Looking at kdump.c : > > > > 1. I understand that this code is mainly used to read a crashdump from > > memory. One can run the same using: > > > > # kdump <start_addr> > > > > where start_addr is basically the start address of the core dump > > (which can also be represented via the 'elfcorehdr' environment > > variable being passed to the crash kernel which represents the > > physical address of the start of the ELF header) > > > > 2. This tool needs READ_ONLY access to /dev/mem (so we need to set > > CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM configuration option accordingly). > > > > 3. The code thereafter reads (via mmap) and verifies the ELF header. > > Subsequently it reads (via mmap) the program header. > > > > 4. Then we collect all the notes and write on STDOUT all the headers > > and notes found in the crashdump collected from memory. > > > > So, as per my understanding even in absence of (more powerful) tools > > like crash (or gdb), we can still go ahead and read the crashdump from > > memory and display all the headers and notes present in the same on > > standard serial out interface using this kdump utility. > > > > This is probably a good to have feature for systems which have very > > simple/minimal rootfs (and I see that a few arm32 systems seem to use > > the same as well) or are low on memory availability. > > > > Now, I wanted to confirm if the 'kdump' utility for reading crashdump > > collected from memory is still needed (as the last commit is dated > > back to 2016 and was done for arm32 systems). If yes, I can go ahead > > and enhance the kdump man page to include the description given above > > - so that it helps users understand how to run the tool. > > > > Please share your opinions. > > Firstly, please use: > > git://git.armlinux.org.uk/~rmk/kexec-tools.git > > for ARM systems - this has some important fixes that aren't in the > mainline repository. I apologise if this is due to omission on my part, can we work towards getting them in the mainline repository? _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: kdump in upstream kexec-tools 2018-04-18 13:01 ` Simon Horman @ 2018-04-18 18:28 ` Russell King 2018-04-19 8:20 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Russell King @ 2018-04-18 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Horman Cc: khalid.aziz, Bhupesh Sharma, kexec, AKASHI Takahiro, ebiederm, Bhupesh SHARMA, Dave Young, Vivek Goyal On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:01:08PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:01:13AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:20:08AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was working on improving documentation/structure of the upstream > > > kexec-tools and I was wondering what is the purpose of the 'kdump' > > > directory inside the kexec-tools. > > > > > > This kdump utility seems to cause confusion with the 'kdump' utility > > > present inside some distributions (for e.g. '/usr/sbin/kdump' present > > > inside fedora) due to the same naming convention and so we should > > > populate/modify the kdump man page to indicate the same, so as to > > > avoid confusion. > > > > > > Presently here are the contents of this directory: > > > > > > # ls kdump/ > > > kdump.8 kdump.c Makefile > > > > > > - Out of these the kdump man documentation (kdump.8) is just a > > > placeholder as suggested by the man page documentation: "kdump - This > > > is just a placeholder until real man page has been written" > > > > > > - Looking at kdump.c : > > > > > > 1. I understand that this code is mainly used to read a crashdump from > > > memory. One can run the same using: > > > > > > # kdump <start_addr> > > > > > > where start_addr is basically the start address of the core dump > > > (which can also be represented via the 'elfcorehdr' environment > > > variable being passed to the crash kernel which represents the > > > physical address of the start of the ELF header) > > > > > > 2. This tool needs READ_ONLY access to /dev/mem (so we need to set > > > CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM configuration option accordingly). > > > > > > 3. The code thereafter reads (via mmap) and verifies the ELF header. > > > Subsequently it reads (via mmap) the program header. > > > > > > 4. Then we collect all the notes and write on STDOUT all the headers > > > and notes found in the crashdump collected from memory. > > > > > > So, as per my understanding even in absence of (more powerful) tools > > > like crash (or gdb), we can still go ahead and read the crashdump from > > > memory and display all the headers and notes present in the same on > > > standard serial out interface using this kdump utility. > > > > > > This is probably a good to have feature for systems which have very > > > simple/minimal rootfs (and I see that a few arm32 systems seem to use > > > the same as well) or are low on memory availability. > > > > > > Now, I wanted to confirm if the 'kdump' utility for reading crashdump > > > collected from memory is still needed (as the last commit is dated > > > back to 2016 and was done for arm32 systems). If yes, I can go ahead > > > and enhance the kdump man page to include the description given above > > > - so that it helps users understand how to run the tool. > > > > > > Please share your opinions. > > > > Firstly, please use: > > > > git://git.armlinux.org.uk/~rmk/kexec-tools.git > > > > for ARM systems - this has some important fixes that aren't in the > > mainline repository. > > I apologise if this is due to omission on my part, > can we work towards getting them in the mainline repository? The problem on ARM was caused because you applied the wrong version of the patches I sent out. When I noticed and reported it, there was no response. My only option over that intervening six months is to provide people with something that actually works properly on 32-bit ARM has been to publish my own kexec-tools git tree with the appropriate fixes in. It now contains a couple more patches than just fixing that up. If you want to merge from the above URL, be my guest, but as far as I'm concerned, it's been proven that sending patches for merging is open to mistakes happening. That wouldn't be too bad if it hadn't taken more than six months to get your attention on this issue. -- Russell King _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: kdump in upstream kexec-tools 2018-04-18 18:28 ` Russell King @ 2018-04-19 8:20 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2018-04-19 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Russell King Cc: khalid.aziz, Bhupesh Sharma, kexec, AKASHI Takahiro, ebiederm, Bhupesh SHARMA, Dave Young, Vivek Goyal On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 07:28:54PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:01:08PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:01:13AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:20:08AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I was working on improving documentation/structure of the upstream > > > > kexec-tools and I was wondering what is the purpose of the 'kdump' > > > > directory inside the kexec-tools. > > > > > > > > This kdump utility seems to cause confusion with the 'kdump' utility > > > > present inside some distributions (for e.g. '/usr/sbin/kdump' present > > > > inside fedora) due to the same naming convention and so we should > > > > populate/modify the kdump man page to indicate the same, so as to > > > > avoid confusion. > > > > > > > > Presently here are the contents of this directory: > > > > > > > > # ls kdump/ > > > > kdump.8 kdump.c Makefile > > > > > > > > - Out of these the kdump man documentation (kdump.8) is just a > > > > placeholder as suggested by the man page documentation: "kdump - This > > > > is just a placeholder until real man page has been written" > > > > > > > > - Looking at kdump.c : > > > > > > > > 1. I understand that this code is mainly used to read a crashdump from > > > > memory. One can run the same using: > > > > > > > > # kdump <start_addr> > > > > > > > > where start_addr is basically the start address of the core dump > > > > (which can also be represented via the 'elfcorehdr' environment > > > > variable being passed to the crash kernel which represents the > > > > physical address of the start of the ELF header) > > > > > > > > 2. This tool needs READ_ONLY access to /dev/mem (so we need to set > > > > CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM configuration option accordingly). > > > > > > > > 3. The code thereafter reads (via mmap) and verifies the ELF header. > > > > Subsequently it reads (via mmap) the program header. > > > > > > > > 4. Then we collect all the notes and write on STDOUT all the headers > > > > and notes found in the crashdump collected from memory. > > > > > > > > So, as per my understanding even in absence of (more powerful) tools > > > > like crash (or gdb), we can still go ahead and read the crashdump from > > > > memory and display all the headers and notes present in the same on > > > > standard serial out interface using this kdump utility. > > > > > > > > This is probably a good to have feature for systems which have very > > > > simple/minimal rootfs (and I see that a few arm32 systems seem to use > > > > the same as well) or are low on memory availability. > > > > > > > > Now, I wanted to confirm if the 'kdump' utility for reading crashdump > > > > collected from memory is still needed (as the last commit is dated > > > > back to 2016 and was done for arm32 systems). If yes, I can go ahead > > > > and enhance the kdump man page to include the description given above > > > > - so that it helps users understand how to run the tool. > > > > > > > > Please share your opinions. > > > > > > Firstly, please use: > > > > > > git://git.armlinux.org.uk/~rmk/kexec-tools.git > > > > > > for ARM systems - this has some important fixes that aren't in the > > > mainline repository. > > > > I apologise if this is due to omission on my part, > > can we work towards getting them in the mainline repository? > > The problem on ARM was caused because you applied the wrong version of > the patches I sent out. When I noticed and reported it, there was no > response. > > My only option over that intervening six months is to provide people > with something that actually works properly on 32-bit ARM has been > to publish my own kexec-tools git tree with the appropriate fixes in. > > It now contains a couple more patches than just fixing that up. > > If you want to merge from the above URL, be my guest, but as far as > I'm concerned, it's been proven that sending patches for merging is > open to mistakes happening. That wouldn't be too bad if it hadn't > taken more than six months to get your attention on this issue. Thanks, pulled. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-19 8:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-04-17 4:50 kdump in upstream kexec-tools Bhupesh Sharma 2018-04-17 9:01 ` Russell King 2018-04-17 10:50 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2018-04-17 12:51 ` Russell King 2018-04-17 17:43 ` Bhupesh Sharma 2018-04-18 13:01 ` Simon Horman 2018-04-18 18:28 ` Russell King 2018-04-19 8:20 ` Simon Horman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox