Kexec Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	 rppt@kernel.org, sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com,  jbouron@amazon.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org,  bhe@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  dan.carpenter@linaro.org,
	liaoyuanhong@vivo.com,  rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
	 piliu@redhat.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,  graf@amazon.com,
	 mario.limonciello@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] liveupdate: skip serialization for context-preserving kexec
Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 17:33:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2vxzjytgzh5r.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aftZZ5AuQcNuqInP@google.com> (Pasha Tatashin's message of "Wed, 6 May 2026 11:12:26 -0400")

On Wed, May 06 2026, Pasha Tatashin wrote:

> On 05-06 10:31, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>> Hi Pasha,
>> 
>> On Wed, May 06 2026, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
>> 
>> > A preserve_context kexec returns to the current kernel, which
>> > is unrelated to live update where the state is passed to the next
>> > kernel. Skip liveupdate_reboot() in this case to avoid serialization
>> > and prevent sessions from being left in a frozen state upon return.
>> 
>> Should we also stop KHO? Now it is stateless and always finalized. I am
>
> No. KHO preserves kernel internal memory; for context-preserved 
> kexec, the 2nd kernel and the 1st kernel do not have overlapping 
> memory. So, whatever the 1st kernel maintains in KHO is an internal 
> detail of the 1st kernel. Once we return from the 2nd kernel to the 1st 
> kernel, all KHO memory is going to stay as-is, and the 1st kernel can 
> even perform a regular kexec or live update later.

My point is that we keep KHO data in the 1st kernel but do not pass it
to the 2nd kernel via setup_data or the devicetree because it should not
use that memory anyway. So essentially we add a check in
kho_fill_kimage() and return early if preserve_context is set.

I don't think it makes much difference in practice so no strong
opinions. Fine either way.

[...]

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-06 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-06  4:32 [PATCH v1 0/3] liveupdate: serialization safety and race fixes Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-06  4:32 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] liveupdate: skip serialization for context-preserving kexec Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-06  8:31   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-06 15:12     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-06 15:33       ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2026-05-06 16:06         ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-06  4:32 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] liveupdate: block outgoing session mutations during serialization Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-06  8:47   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-06 15:25     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-06  4:32 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] liveupdate: pin sessions and handle inactive ones " Pasha Tatashin
2026-05-06  8:53   ` Pratyush Yadav

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2vxzjytgzh5r.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=jbouron@amazon.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=liaoyuanhong@vivo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=piliu@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox