From: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
To: Philipp Rudo <prudo@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@linux.ibm.com>, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] s390: add variable command line size
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 17:06:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yt9dwnkgpffh.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211207152940.2f6536e6@rhtmp> (Philipp Rudo's message of "Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:29:40 +0100")
Hi Philipp,
Philipp Rudo <prudo@redhat.com> writes:
>> diff --git a/kexec/arch/s390/kexec-image.c b/kexec/arch/s390/kexec-image.c
>> index 3c24fdfe3c7c..7747d02399db 100644
>> --- a/kexec/arch/s390/kexec-image.c
>> +++ b/kexec/arch/s390/kexec-image.c
>> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
>> #include <fcntl.h>
>>
>> static uint64_t crash_base, crash_end;
>> -static char command_line[COMMAND_LINESIZE];
>> +static char *command_line;
>
> isn't this the perfect opportunity to get rid of this global variable
> and...
>
>> static void add_segment_check(struct kexec_info *info, const void *buf,
>> size_t bufsz, unsigned long base, size_t memsz)
>> @@ -38,11 +38,16 @@ static void add_segment_check(struct kexec_info *info, const void *buf,
>>
>> int command_line_add(const char *str)
>
> ... simply pass the pointer as an argument ;)
The reason for it being global is that command_line_add() might get
called multiple times. But yes, we could move that variable scope into
the calling function.
Thanks
Sven
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-07 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-22 7:13 [PATCH 0/3] s390: add support for extended cmdline length Sven Schnelle
2021-11-22 7:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] s390: add variable command line size Sven Schnelle
2021-12-07 14:29 ` Philipp Rudo
2021-12-07 16:06 ` Sven Schnelle [this message]
2021-11-22 7:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] s390: use KEXEC_ALL_OPTIONS Sven Schnelle
2021-11-22 7:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] s390: add support for --reuse-cmdline Sven Schnelle
2021-12-07 14:34 ` Philipp Rudo
2021-12-07 16:12 ` Sven Schnelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yt9dwnkgpffh.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=egorenar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=prudo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox