KVM-RISCV Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/12] KVM: nVMX: Make an event request if INIT or SIPI is pending on VM-Enter
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:31:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220921003201.1441511-8-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220921003201.1441511-1-seanjc@google.com>

Evaluate interrupts, i.e. set KVM_REQ_EVENT, if INIT or SIPI is pending
when emulating nested VM-Enter.  INIT is blocked while the CPU is in VMX
root mode, but not in VMX non-root, i.e. becomes unblocked on VM-Enter.
This bug has been masked by KVM calling ->check_nested_events() in the
core run loop, but that hack will be fixed in the near future.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 18 ++++++------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index 3a080051a4ec..5922531f6c52 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -3377,6 +3377,8 @@ enum nvmx_vmentry_status nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		(CPU_BASED_INTR_WINDOW_EXITING | CPU_BASED_NMI_WINDOW_EXITING);
 	if (likely(!evaluate_pending_interrupts) && kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
 		evaluate_pending_interrupts |= vmx_has_apicv_interrupt(vcpu);
+	if (!evaluate_pending_interrupts)
+		evaluate_pending_interrupts |= kvm_apic_has_pending_init_or_sipi(vcpu);
 
 	if (!vmx->nested.nested_run_pending ||
 	    !(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_DEBUG_CONTROLS))
@@ -3457,18 +3459,10 @@ enum nvmx_vmentry_status nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * If L1 had a pending IRQ/NMI until it executed
-	 * VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME which wasn't delivered because it was
-	 * disallowed (e.g. interrupts disabled), L0 needs to
-	 * evaluate if this pending event should cause an exit from L2
-	 * to L1 or delivered directly to L2 (e.g. In case L1 don't
-	 * intercept EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT).
-	 *
-	 * Usually this would be handled by the processor noticing an
-	 * IRQ/NMI window request, or checking RVI during evaluation of
-	 * pending virtual interrupts.  However, this setting was done
-	 * on VMCS01 and now VMCS02 is active instead. Thus, we force L0
-	 * to perform pending event evaluation by requesting a KVM_REQ_EVENT.
+	 * Re-evaluate pending events if L1 had a pending IRQ/NMI/INIT/SIPI
+	 * when it executed VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME, as entering non-root mode can
+	 * effectively unblock various events, e.g. INIT/SIPI cause VM-Exit
+	 * unconditionally.
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(evaluate_pending_interrupts))
 		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
-- 
2.37.3.968.ga6b4b080e4-goog



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-21  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-21  0:31 [PATCH v4 00/12] KVM: x86: never write to memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] KVM: x86: make vendor code check for all nested events Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] KVM: nVMX: Make an event request when pending an MTF nested VM-Exit Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] KVM: x86: Rename and expose helper to detect if INIT/SIPI are allowed Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] KVM: x86: Rename kvm_apic_has_events() to make it INIT/SIPI specific Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] KVM: x86: lapic does not have to process INIT if it is blocked Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] KVM: SVM: Make an event request if INIT or SIPI is pending when GIF is set Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] KVM: nVMX: Make event request on VMXOFF iff INIT/SIPI is pending Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] KVM: x86: Don't snapshot pending INIT/SIPI prior to checking nested events Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: x86: never write to memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block() Sean Christopherson
2023-12-07  1:03   ` Jim Mattson
2023-12-07 16:21     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-12-10 22:52       ` Jim Mattson
2023-12-12 15:28         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-12-13 22:25           ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-12-13 22:31             ` Jim Mattson
2023-12-13 22:44               ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-12-13 22:59             ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:32 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] KVM: mips, x86: do not rely on KVM_REQ_UNHALT Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 13:17   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2022-09-21  0:32 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] KVM: remove KVM_REQ_UNHALT Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 14:52   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220921003201.1441511-8-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox