KVM-RISCV Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: x86: never write to memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block()
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 07:28:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXh8Nq_y_szj1WN0@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALMp9eTT97oDmQT7pxeOMLQbt-371aMtC2Kev+-kWXVRDVrjeg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Dec 10, 2023, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 8:21?AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> > Doh.  We got the less obvious cases and missed the obvious one.
> >
> > Ugh, and we also missed a related mess in kvm_guest_apic_has_interrupt().  That
> > thing should really be folded into vmx_has_nested_events().
> >
> > Good gravy.  And vmx_interrupt_blocked() does the wrong thing because that
> > specifically checks if L1 interrupts are blocked.
> >
> > Compile tested only, and definitely needs to be chunked into multiple patches,
> > but I think something like this mess?
> 
> The proposed patch does not fix the problem. In fact, it messes things
> up so much that I don't get any test results back.

Drat.

> Google has an internal K-U-T test that demonstrates the problem. I
> will post it soon.

Received, I'll dig in soonish, though "soonish" might unfortunately might mean
2024.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-12 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-21  0:31 [PATCH v4 00/12] KVM: x86: never write to memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] KVM: x86: make vendor code check for all nested events Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] KVM: nVMX: Make an event request when pending an MTF nested VM-Exit Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] KVM: x86: Rename and expose helper to detect if INIT/SIPI are allowed Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] KVM: x86: Rename kvm_apic_has_events() to make it INIT/SIPI specific Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] KVM: x86: lapic does not have to process INIT if it is blocked Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] KVM: SVM: Make an event request if INIT or SIPI is pending when GIF is set Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] KVM: nVMX: Make an event request if INIT or SIPI is pending on VM-Enter Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] KVM: nVMX: Make event request on VMXOFF iff INIT/SIPI is pending Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] KVM: x86: Don't snapshot pending INIT/SIPI prior to checking nested events Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: x86: never write to memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block() Sean Christopherson
2023-12-07  1:03   ` Jim Mattson
2023-12-07 16:21     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-12-10 22:52       ` Jim Mattson
2023-12-12 15:28         ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-12-13 22:25           ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-12-13 22:31             ` Jim Mattson
2023-12-13 22:44               ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-12-13 22:59             ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21  0:32 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] KVM: mips, x86: do not rely on KVM_REQ_UNHALT Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 13:17   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2022-09-21  0:32 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] KVM: remove KVM_REQ_UNHALT Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 14:52   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZXh8Nq_y_szj1WN0@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox