[PATCH V4 0/6] Add riscv tests to cover the base extension specs

[Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>]

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 06:24:09PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:50:51PM +0100, cem at kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This is a new (V4) version of this series to create tests to cover functions
> > of the riscv's SBI base implementation spec. The series also includes a
> > a few helpers to reduce code duplication.
> > 
> > This new version includes updates related to Drew reviews, and rebasing of
> > the patches according to the changes. 
> > This new series has also been rebased on TOT, didn't affect the patches,
> > but worth the heads up.
> > 
> > Patches tagged with V4 needed modifications from the previous version.
> > 
> > Detailed updates are specified on a patch-basis
> > 
> > 
> > Carlos Maiolino (6):
> >   riscv: Add a wrapper to call sbi_ecall for base extension
> >   riscv: Add test to probe SBI Extension
> >   riscv: Factor out environment variable check and report generation
> >   riscv: Implement test for architecture ID register
> >   riscv: Enable gen_report() to print the wrong value in case of failure
> >   riscv: Test for specific SBI implementation ID
> > 
> >  riscv/sbi.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.44.0
> >
> 
> Merged to https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests

Hi Carlos,

I just realized you've forgotten to CC tech-prs on v3 and v4.

drew