Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: nVMX/nSVM: Don't intercept #UD when running L2

[Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>]

----- pbonzini@redhat.com wrote:

> On 11/01/2018 00:01, Liran Alon wrote:
> > 
> > ----- jmattson@google.com wrote:
> > 
> >> Liran, Are you planning to submit reverts for ae1f57670703 and
> >> ac9b305caa0d?
> > 
> > Yes.
> > I just didn't had time to deal with this as I was busy with other
> Oracle Ravello specific issues.
> > I think reverting both commits is the right thing to do.
> > 
> > Paolo: Note that the VMware Backdoor support series we have patched
> here (was not yet queued) is based a bit on the code of this commit.
> Do you wish me to first wait that those patches will be queued and
> then I will create the revert for these (and resolve relevant
> conflicts) or that I will create the reverts for these on top of what
> is currently queued and you will resolve the conflicts resulting when
> applying VMware Backdoor support series?
> 
> I can take care of the reverts, but you'll have to repost the
> backdoor
> series.  Unfortunately due to my involvement with Spectre in Red Hat
> (and Radim's vacation :)) I have fallen short on the review backlog.
> 
> Paolo

No problem.
I will wait until you queue the reverts to adjust the VMware backdoor series accordingly.

Thanks,
-Liran