* [kvm:vtd-pi 34/38] arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c:609:16: sparse: symbol 'vcpu_to_pi_desc' was not declared. Should it be static?
@ 2015-09-25 13:18 kbuild test robot
2015-09-25 13:18 ` [PATCH kvm] KVM: x86: vcpu_to_pi_desc() can be static kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2015-09-25 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Wu; +Cc: kbuild-all, Paolo Bonzini, Alex Williamson, kvm
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git vtd-pi
head: 7690a83389ca993040950b6ed7b4b5efbd50a782
commit: 2d579d1d9677512d50d00f5864344331add3f9bc [34/38] KVM: x86: Update IRTE for posted-interrupts
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
git checkout 2d579d1d9677512d50d00f5864344331add3f9bc
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c:609:16: sparse: symbol 'vcpu_to_pi_desc' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c:10347:5: sparse: symbol 'vmx_update_pi_irte' was not declared. Should it be static?
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH kvm] KVM: x86: vcpu_to_pi_desc() can be static
2015-09-25 13:18 [kvm:vtd-pi 34/38] arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c:609:16: sparse: symbol 'vcpu_to_pi_desc' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
@ 2015-09-25 13:18 ` kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2015-09-25 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Feng Wu; +Cc: kbuild-all, Paolo Bonzini, Alex Williamson, kvm
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
vmx.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 4480752..c1833e1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static inline struct vcpu_vmx *to_vmx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return container_of(vcpu, struct vcpu_vmx, vcpu);
}
-struct pi_desc *vcpu_to_pi_desc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static struct pi_desc *vcpu_to_pi_desc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
return &(to_vmx(vcpu)->pi_desc);
}
@@ -10344,8 +10344,8 @@ static void vmx_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
* @set: set or unset PI
* returns 0 on success, < 0 on failure
*/
-int vmx_update_pi_irte(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq,
- uint32_t guest_irq, bool set)
+static int vmx_update_pi_irte(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq,
+ uint32_t guest_irq, bool set)
{
struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e;
struct kvm_irq_routing_table *irq_rt;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-25 13:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-25 13:18 [kvm:vtd-pi 34/38] arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c:609:16: sparse: symbol 'vcpu_to_pi_desc' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
2015-09-25 13:18 ` [PATCH kvm] KVM: x86: vcpu_to_pi_desc() can be static kbuild test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox