From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Wanpeng Li" <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] KVM: lapic: Allow user to override auto-tuning of timer advancement
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:23:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190415162348.GD24010@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E207F532-5EB9-4899-BE86-9F29A689713C@oracle.com>
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 02:35:39PM +0300, Liran Alon wrote:
>
>
> > On 12 Apr 2019, at 23:18, Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Disable auto-tuning the timer advancement if the user specifies an
> > explicit value via the module param. Aside from the obvious override
> > capability, this also allows the KVM admin to set the advancement
> > beyond the internally-capped max of 5000ns.
> >
> > Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> > Fixes: 3b8a5df6c4dc6 ("KVM: LAPIC: Tune lapic_timer_advance_ns automatically")
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
>
> I agree we should allow admin the ability to disable the auto-tuning.
> However, I think we should keep the semantic of lapic_timer_advance_ns value.
> Whether this value is used as initial-value for auto-tuning or is auto-tuning
> disabled is a different knob for admin in my opinion. Therefore, I think we
> should just add another module parameter which basically set the initial
> value for apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done.
I waffled on whether to add a param or do the implicit override. I opted
for the implicit behavior primarily because I think most people would
expect that setting lapic_timer_advance_ns to some specific value would
fix the advancement at said value, as opposed to acting as a hint to the
autotuning logic. In other words, I again don't have a strong opinion :-)
> One could also wonder if it makes sense that whether auto-tuning will be
> enabled or not varies between VMs and should not be a global variable of KVM
> module?
I have no opinion on this one as I don't have any direct visibility into
how the auto-tuning will be used in real world deployments.
>
> -Liran
>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 2 ++
> > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 ++
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > index 70a0acd98e9e..c43cd26f040b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > @@ -2286,6 +2286,8 @@ int kvm_create_lapic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 timer_advance_ns)
> > HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED);
> > apic->lapic_timer.timer.function = apic_timer_fn;
> > apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_ns = timer_advance_ns;
> > + if (timer_advance_ns != LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_DEFAULT_NS)
> > + apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done = true;
> >
> > /*
> > * APIC is created enabled. This will prevent kvm_lapic_set_base from
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> > index 3e97f8a68967..c7233629c05b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
> > #define APIC_BUS_CYCLE_NS 1
> > #define APIC_BUS_FREQUENCY (1000000000ULL / APIC_BUS_CYCLE_NS)
> >
> > +#define LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_DEFAULT_NS 1000
> > +
> > enum lapic_mode {
> > LAPIC_MODE_DISABLED = 0,
> > LAPIC_MODE_INVALID = X2APIC_ENABLE,
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index b303a21a2bc2..709a8bf5ae0e 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static u32 __read_mostly tsc_tolerance_ppm = 250;
> > module_param(tsc_tolerance_ppm, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> >
> > /* lapic timer advance (tscdeadline mode only) in nanoseconds */
> > -static u32 __read_mostly lapic_timer_advance_ns = 1000;
> > +static u32 __read_mostly lapic_timer_advance_ns = LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_DEFAULT_NS;
> > module_param(lapic_timer_advance_ns, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> >
> > static bool __read_mostly vector_hashing = true;
> > --
> > 2.21.0
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-15 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-12 20:18 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: lapic: Fix a variety of timer adv issues Sean Christopherson
2019-04-12 20:18 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: lapic: Hard cap the auto-calculated timer advancement Sean Christopherson
2019-04-14 10:22 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-12 20:18 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: lapic: Delay 1ns at a time when waiting for timer to "expire" Sean Christopherson
2019-04-14 11:25 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-15 16:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-15 17:06 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-16 11:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-04-16 11:04 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-16 11:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-04-12 20:18 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: lapic: Track lapic timer advance per vCPU Sean Christopherson
2019-04-14 11:29 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-12 20:18 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: lapic: Allow user to override auto-tuning of timer advancement Sean Christopherson
2019-04-14 11:35 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-15 16:23 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-04-15 17:10 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-12 20:18 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: lapic: Busy wait for timer to expire when using hv_timer Sean Christopherson
2019-04-14 11:47 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-12 20:18 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: lapic: Clean up the code for handling of a pre-expired hv_timer Sean Christopherson
2019-04-14 12:15 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-15 16:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-15 17:25 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-16 16:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-16 16:48 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-16 17:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-16 17:27 ` Liran Alon
2019-04-16 11:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-04-12 20:18 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: VMX: Skip delta_tsc shift-and-divide if the dividend is zero Sean Christopherson
2019-04-14 12:21 ` Liran Alon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190415162348.GD24010@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox