From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 4/6] s390x: lib: add SPX and STPX instruction wrapper
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 19:42:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200120184256.188698-5-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200120184256.188698-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Add a wrapper for the SET PREFIX and STORE PREFIX instructions, and
use it instead of using inline assembly.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 13 +++++++++++++
s390x/intercept.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
index 1a5e3c6..15a4d49 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
@@ -284,4 +284,17 @@ static inline int servc(uint32_t command, unsigned long sccb)
return cc;
}
+static inline void set_prefix(uint32_t new_prefix)
+{
+ asm volatile(" spx %0" : : "Q" (new_prefix) : "memory");
+}
+
+static inline uint32_t get_prefix(void)
+{
+ uint32_t current_prefix;
+
+ asm volatile(" stpx %0" : "=Q" (current_prefix));
+ return current_prefix;
+}
+
#endif
diff --git a/s390x/intercept.c b/s390x/intercept.c
index 3696e33..5f46b82 100644
--- a/s390x/intercept.c
+++ b/s390x/intercept.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
#include <asm/interrupt.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
+#include <asm/facility.h>
static uint8_t pagebuf[PAGE_SIZE * 2] __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE * 2)));
@@ -26,13 +27,10 @@ static void test_stpx(void)
uint32_t new_prefix = (uint32_t)(intptr_t)pagebuf;
/* Can we successfully change the prefix? */
- asm volatile (
- " stpx %0\n"
- " spx %2\n"
- " stpx %1\n"
- " spx %0\n"
- : "+Q"(old_prefix), "+Q"(tst_prefix)
- : "Q"(new_prefix));
+ old_prefix = get_prefix();
+ set_prefix(new_prefix);
+ tst_prefix = get_prefix();
+ set_prefix(old_prefix);
report(old_prefix == 0 && tst_prefix == new_prefix, "store prefix");
expect_pgm_int();
@@ -63,14 +61,10 @@ static void test_spx(void)
* some facility bits there ... at least some of them should be
* set in our buffer afterwards.
*/
- asm volatile (
- " stpx %0\n"
- " spx %1\n"
- " stfl 0\n"
- " spx %0\n"
- : "+Q"(old_prefix)
- : "Q"(new_prefix)
- : "memory");
+ old_prefix = get_prefix();
+ set_prefix(new_prefix);
+ stfl();
+ set_prefix(old_prefix);
report(pagebuf[GEN_LC_STFL] != 0, "stfl to new prefix");
expect_pgm_int();
--
2.24.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-20 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-20 18:42 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 0/6] s390x: SCLP Unit test Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-20 18:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 1/6] s390x: export sclp_setup_int Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-20 18:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 2/6] s390x: sclp: add service call instruction wrapper Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-20 18:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 3/6] s390x: lib: fix stfl wrapper asm Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-21 6:15 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-21 9:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21 12:42 ` Janosch Frank
2020-01-20 18:42 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2020-01-20 18:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 5/6] s390x: lib: fix program interrupt handler if sclp_busy was set Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-21 6:19 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-21 9:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-20 18:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 6/6] s390x: SCLP unit test Claudio Imbrenda
2020-01-22 9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-22 10:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-22 10:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-22 10:31 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-22 10:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-22 10:39 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-22 10:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-22 11:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-22 12:13 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-22 12:16 ` Thomas Huth
2020-01-22 14:15 ` strict aliasing in kvm-unit-tests (was: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 6/6] s390x: SCLP unit test) Thomas Huth
2020-01-22 14:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-22 15:01 ` Laurent Vivier
2020-01-22 9:55 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 0/6] s390x: SCLP Unit test David Hildenbrand
2020-01-22 10:02 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200120184256.188698-5-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox