From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, sami.mujawar@arm.com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 kvmtool 10/30] virtio/pci: Make memory and IO BARs independent
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:16:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200129181638.6cbfc8f1@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200123134805.1993-11-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:47:45 +0000
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote:
Hi,
> From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
>
> Currently, callbacks for memory BAR 1 call the IO port emulation. This
> means that the memory BAR needs I/O Space to be enabled whenever Memory
> Space is enabled.
>
> Refactor the code so the two type of BARs are independent. Also, unify
> ioport/mmio callback arguments so that they all receive a virtio_device.
That's a nice cleanup, I like that it avoids shoehorning everything as legacy I/O into the emulation.
Just a nit below, but nevertheless:
> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
> virtio/pci.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virtio/pci.c b/virtio/pci.c
> index eeb5b5efa6e1..6723a1f3a84d 100644
> --- a/virtio/pci.c
> +++ b/virtio/pci.c
> @@ -87,8 +87,8 @@ static inline bool virtio_pci__msix_enabled(struct virtio_pci *vpci)
> return vpci->pci_hdr.msix.ctrl & cpu_to_le16(PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE);
> }
>
> -static bool virtio_pci__specific_io_in(struct kvm *kvm, struct virtio_device *vdev, u16 port,
> - void *data, int size, int offset)
> +static bool virtio_pci__specific_data_in(struct kvm *kvm, struct virtio_device *vdev,
> + void *data, int size, unsigned long offset)
> {
> u32 config_offset;
> struct virtio_pci *vpci = vdev->virtio;
> @@ -117,20 +117,17 @@ static bool virtio_pci__specific_io_in(struct kvm *kvm, struct virtio_device *vd
> return false;
> }
>
> -static bool virtio_pci__io_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +static bool virtio_pci__data_in(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, struct virtio_device *vdev,
> + unsigned long offset, void *data, int size)
> {
> - unsigned long offset;
> bool ret = true;
> - struct virtio_device *vdev;
> struct virtio_pci *vpci;
> struct virt_queue *vq;
> struct kvm *kvm;
> u32 val;
>
> kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> - vdev = ioport->priv;
> vpci = vdev->virtio;
> - offset = port - vpci->port_addr;
>
> switch (offset) {
> case VIRTIO_PCI_HOST_FEATURES:
> @@ -154,13 +151,26 @@ static bool virtio_pci__io_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 p
> vpci->isr = VIRTIO_IRQ_LOW;
> break;
> default:
> - ret = virtio_pci__specific_io_in(kvm, vdev, port, data, size, offset);
> + ret = virtio_pci__specific_data_in(kvm, vdev, data, size, offset);
> break;
> };
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static bool virtio_pci__io_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +{
> + unsigned long offset;
> + struct virtio_device *vdev;
> + struct virtio_pci *vpci;
> +
> + vdev = ioport->priv;
> + vpci = vdev->virtio;
> + offset = port - vpci->port_addr;
You could initialise the variables directly at their declaration, which looks nicer and underlines that they are just helper variables.
Same below.
Cheers,
Andre.
> +
> + return virtio_pci__data_in(vcpu, vdev, offset, data, size);
> +}
> +
> static void update_msix_map(struct virtio_pci *vpci,
> struct msix_table *msix_entry, u32 vecnum)
> {
> @@ -185,8 +195,8 @@ static void update_msix_map(struct virtio_pci *vpci,
> irq__update_msix_route(vpci->kvm, gsi, &msix_entry->msg);
> }
>
> -static bool virtio_pci__specific_io_out(struct kvm *kvm, struct virtio_device *vdev, u16 port,
> - void *data, int size, int offset)
> +static bool virtio_pci__specific_data_out(struct kvm *kvm, struct virtio_device *vdev,
> + void *data, int size, unsigned long offset)
> {
> struct virtio_pci *vpci = vdev->virtio;
> u32 config_offset, vec;
> @@ -259,19 +269,16 @@ static bool virtio_pci__specific_io_out(struct kvm *kvm, struct virtio_device *v
> return false;
> }
>
> -static bool virtio_pci__io_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +static bool virtio_pci__data_out(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, struct virtio_device *vdev,
> + unsigned long offset, void *data, int size)
> {
> - unsigned long offset;
> bool ret = true;
> - struct virtio_device *vdev;
> struct virtio_pci *vpci;
> struct kvm *kvm;
> u32 val;
>
> kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> - vdev = ioport->priv;
> vpci = vdev->virtio;
> - offset = port - vpci->port_addr;
>
> switch (offset) {
> case VIRTIO_PCI_GUEST_FEATURES:
> @@ -304,13 +311,26 @@ static bool virtio_pci__io_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16
> virtio_notify_status(kvm, vdev, vpci->dev, vpci->status);
> break;
> default:
> - ret = virtio_pci__specific_io_out(kvm, vdev, port, data, size, offset);
> + ret = virtio_pci__specific_data_out(kvm, vdev, data, size, offset);
> break;
> };
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static bool virtio_pci__io_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +{
> + unsigned long offset;
> + struct virtio_device *vdev;
> + struct virtio_pci *vpci;
> +
> + vdev = ioport->priv;
> + vpci = vdev->virtio;
> + offset = port - vpci->port_addr;
> +
> + return virtio_pci__data_out(vcpu, vdev, offset, data, size);
> +}
> +
> static struct ioport_operations virtio_pci__io_ops = {
> .io_in = virtio_pci__io_in,
> .io_out = virtio_pci__io_out,
> @@ -320,7 +340,8 @@ static void virtio_pci__msix_mmio_callback(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len,
> u8 is_write, void *ptr)
> {
> - struct virtio_pci *vpci = ptr;
> + struct virtio_device *vdev = ptr;
> + struct virtio_pci *vpci = vdev->virtio;
> struct msix_table *table;
> int vecnum;
> size_t offset;
> @@ -419,11 +440,15 @@ static void virtio_pci__io_mmio_callback(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len,
> u8 is_write, void *ptr)
> {
> - struct virtio_pci *vpci = ptr;
> - int direction = is_write ? KVM_EXIT_IO_OUT : KVM_EXIT_IO_IN;
> - u16 port = vpci->port_addr + (addr & (PCI_IO_SIZE - 1));
> + struct virtio_device *vdev = ptr;
> + struct virtio_pci *vpci = vdev->virtio;
>
> - kvm__emulate_io(vcpu, port, data, direction, len, 1);
> + if (!is_write)
> + virtio_pci__data_in(vcpu, vdev, addr - vpci->mmio_addr,
> + data, len);
> + else
> + virtio_pci__data_out(vcpu, vdev, addr - vpci->mmio_addr,
> + data, len);
> }
>
> int virtio_pci__init(struct kvm *kvm, void *dev, struct virtio_device *vdev,
> @@ -445,13 +470,13 @@ int virtio_pci__init(struct kvm *kvm, void *dev, struct virtio_device *vdev,
>
> vpci->mmio_addr = pci_get_mmio_block(PCI_IO_SIZE);
> r = kvm__register_mmio(kvm, vpci->mmio_addr, PCI_IO_SIZE, false,
> - virtio_pci__io_mmio_callback, vpci);
> + virtio_pci__io_mmio_callback, vdev);
> if (r < 0)
> goto free_ioport;
>
> vpci->msix_io_block = pci_get_mmio_block(PCI_IO_SIZE * 2);
> r = kvm__register_mmio(kvm, vpci->msix_io_block, PCI_IO_SIZE * 2, false,
> - virtio_pci__msix_mmio_callback, vpci);
> + virtio_pci__msix_mmio_callback, vdev);
> if (r < 0)
> goto free_mmio;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-29 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-23 13:47 [PATCH v2 kvmtool 00/30] Add reassignable BARs and PCIE 1.1 support Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 01/30] Makefile: Use correct objcopy binary when cross-compiling for x86_64 Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 02/30] hw/i8042: Compile only for x86 Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-27 18:07 ` Andre Przywara
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 03/30] pci: Fix BAR resource sizing arbitration Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-27 18:07 ` Andre Przywara
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 04/30] Remove pci-shmem device Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 05/30] Check that a PCI device's memory size is power of two Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-27 18:07 ` Andre Przywara
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 06/30] arm/pci: Advertise only PCI bus 0 in the DT Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-27 18:08 ` Andre Przywara
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 07/30] ioport: pci: Move port allocations to PCI devices Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-07 17:02 ` Andre Przywara
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 08/30] pci: Fix ioport allocation size Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 09/30] arm/pci: Fix PCI IO region Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-29 18:16 ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-04 16:20 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-03-05 13:06 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 10/30] virtio/pci: Make memory and IO BARs independent Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-29 18:16 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2020-03-05 15:41 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 11/30] vfio/pci: Allocate correct size for MSIX table and PBA BARs Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-29 18:16 ` Andre Przywara
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 12/30] vfio/pci: Don't assume that only even numbered BARs are 64bit Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-30 14:50 ` Andre Przywara
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 13/30] vfio/pci: Ignore expansion ROM BAR writes Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-30 14:50 ` Andre Przywara
2020-01-30 15:52 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 14/30] vfio/pci: Don't access potentially unallocated regions Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-29 18:17 ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-06 10:54 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 15/30] virtio: Don't ignore initialization failures Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-30 14:51 ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-06 11:20 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-03-30 9:27 ` André Przywara
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 16/30] Don't ignore errors registering a device, ioport or mmio emulation Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-30 14:51 ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-06 11:28 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 17/30] hw/vesa: Don't ignore fatal errors Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-30 14:52 ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-06 12:33 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 18/30] hw/vesa: Set the size for BAR 0 Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-03 12:20 ` Andre Przywara
2020-02-03 12:27 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-05 17:00 ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-06 12:40 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 19/30] Use independent read/write locks for ioport and mmio Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-03 12:23 ` Andre Przywara
2020-02-05 11:25 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 20/30] pci: Add helpers for BAR values and memory/IO space access Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-05 17:00 ` Andre Przywara
2020-02-05 17:02 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 21/30] virtio/pci: Get emulated region address from BARs Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-05 17:01 ` Andre Przywara
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 22/30] vfio: Destroy memslot when unmapping the associated VAs Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-05 17:01 ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-09 12:38 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 23/30] vfio: Reserve ioports when configuring the BAR Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-05 18:34 ` Andre Przywara
2020-01-23 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 24/30] vfio/pci: Don't write configuration value twice Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-05 18:35 ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-09 15:21 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 25/30] pci: Implement callbacks for toggling BAR emulation Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-06 18:21 ` Andre Przywara
2020-02-07 10:12 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-07 15:39 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 26/30] pci: Toggle BAR I/O and memory space emulation Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-06 18:21 ` Andre Przywara
2020-02-07 11:08 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-07 11:36 ` Andre Przywara
2020-02-07 11:44 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-03-09 14:54 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 27/30] pci: Implement reassignable BARs Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-07 16:50 ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-10 14:17 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 28/30] arm/fdt: Remove 'linux,pci-probe-only' property Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-07 16:51 ` Andre Przywara
2020-02-07 17:38 ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-10 16:04 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-23 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 29/30] vfio: Trap MMIO access to BAR addresses which aren't page aligned Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-07 16:51 ` Andre Przywara
2020-01-23 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 30/30] arm/arm64: Add PCI Express 1.1 support Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-07 16:51 ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-10 16:28 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-02-07 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 kvmtool 00/30] Add reassignable BARs and PCIE " Andre Przywara
2020-05-13 14:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-13 15:15 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-05-13 16:41 ` Alexandru Elisei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200129181638.6cbfc8f1@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=sami.mujawar@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox