public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	cohuck@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/4] S390x: CPU Topology Information
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:37:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220110133755.22238-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

Hi,

new version of the series with corrections.

When facility 11 is available inside the S390x architecture, 2 new
instructions are available: PTF and STSI with function code 15.

Let's check their availability in QEMU/KVM and their coherence
with the CPU topology provided to the QEMU -smp parameter and as
argument for the test.

To run these tests successfully you will need both the Linux and the
QEMU patches, at least the following or newer patches:

    https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/8/3/201

    https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-s390x/2021-07/msg00165.html

Then if you have the text you can run directly the unit test or directly
start QEMU with:

# ./s390x-run s390x/topology.elf \
	-smp 5,drawers=2,books=3,sockets=4,cores=4,maxcpus=96 \
	-append "-d 2 -b 3 -s 4 -c 4 -m 96"

If you do not have the patches you can still use the test but only with
the first two topology levels like in:

# ./s390x-run s390x/topology.elf \
	-smp 5,sockets=24,cores=4,maxcpus=96 \
	-append "-s 24 -c 4 -m 96"

Of course the declaration of the number of socket and core must be
coherent.

Regards,
Pierre

Pierre Morel (4):
  s390x: lib: Add SCLP toplogy nested level
  s390x: stsi: Define vm_is_kvm to be used in different tests
  s390x: topology: Check the Perform Topology Function
  s390x: topology: Checking Configuration Topology Information

 lib/s390x/sclp.c    |   6 +
 lib/s390x/sclp.h    |   4 +-
 lib/s390x/stsi.h    |  76 ++++++++++
 lib/s390x/vm.c      |  39 +++++
 lib/s390x/vm.h      |   1 +
 s390x/Makefile      |   1 +
 s390x/stsi.c        |  23 +--
 s390x/topology.c    | 346 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 s390x/unittests.cfg |   4 +
 9 files changed, 478 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 lib/s390x/stsi.h
 create mode 100644 s390x/topology.c

-- 
2.27.0

Changelog:

From V2:

- Check if the test in running in KVM
  (Janosch)

- patch on "Simplify stsi_get_fc and move it to library"
  pushed separatly

- replace named level with abstracted topology levels
  to get rid of a possible naming controversy
  (Pierre)

- Better checks and new checks for STSI(15,1,x)
  (Pierre)

From V1:

- Simplify the stsi_get_fc function when pushing it into lib
  (Janosch)

- Simplify PTF inline assembly as PTF instruction does not use RRE
  second argument
  (Claudio)

- Rename Test global name
  (Claudio, Janosch)

- readibility, naming for PTF_REQ_* and removed unused globals
  (Janosch)

- skipping tests which could fail when run on LPAR
  (Janosh)

- Missing prefix_pop
  (Janosch)


             reply	other threads:[~2022-01-10 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-10 13:37 Pierre Morel [this message]
2022-01-10 13:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/4] s390x: lib: Add SCLP toplogy nested level Pierre Morel
2022-01-10 13:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/4] s390x: stsi: Define vm_is_kvm to be used in different tests Pierre Morel
2022-01-11 12:27   ` Janosch Frank
2022-01-17 14:57     ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-18  8:35       ` Janosch Frank
2022-01-18 17:07         ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-11 13:08   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-01-17 15:05     ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-10 13:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/4] s390x: topology: Check the Perform Topology Function Pierre Morel
2022-01-11 11:25   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-01-17 15:07     ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-10 13:37 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/4] s390x: topology: Checking Configuration Topology Information Pierre Morel
2022-01-11 13:30   ` Janosch Frank
2022-01-17 15:14     ` Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220110133755.22238-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox