Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/4] s390x: stsi: Define vm_is_kvm to be used in different tests

[Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>]

On 1/18/22 09:35, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 1/17/22 15:57, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/11/22 13:27, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>> On 1/10/22 14:37, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>>> We need in several tests to check if the VM we are running in
>>>> is KVM.
>>>> Let's add the test.
>>>>
>>>> To check the VM type we use the STSI 3.2.2 instruction, let's
>>>> define it's response structure in a central header.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    lib/s390x/stsi.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    lib/s390x/vm.c   | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    lib/s390x/vm.h   |  1 +
>>>>    s390x/stsi.c     | 23 ++---------------------
>>>>    4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>>    create mode 100644 lib/s390x/stsi.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/stsi.h b/lib/s390x/stsi.h
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 00000000..02cc94a6
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/lib/s390x/stsi.h
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Structures used to Store System Information
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2021 IBM Inc
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifndef _S390X_STSI_H_
>>>> +#define _S390X_STSI_H_
>>>> +
>>>> +struct sysinfo_3_2_2 {
>>>> +    uint8_t reserved[31];
>>>> +    uint8_t count;
>>>> +    struct {
>>>> +        uint8_t reserved2[4];
>>>> +        uint16_t total_cpus;
>>>> +        uint16_t conf_cpus;
>>>> +        uint16_t standby_cpus;
>>>> +        uint16_t reserved_cpus;
>>>> +        uint8_t name[8];
>>>> +        uint32_t caf;
>>>> +        uint8_t cpi[16];
>>>> +        uint8_t reserved5[3];
>>>> +        uint8_t ext_name_encoding;
>>>> +        uint32_t reserved3;
>>>> +        uint8_t uuid[16];
>>>> +    } vm[8];
>>>> +    uint8_t reserved4[1504];
>>>> +    uint8_t ext_names[8][256];
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +#endif  /* _S390X_STSI_H_ */
>>>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/vm.c b/lib/s390x/vm.c
>>>> index a5b92863..3e11401e 100644
>>>> --- a/lib/s390x/vm.c
>>>> +++ b/lib/s390x/vm.c
>>>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>>>>    #include <alloc_page.h>
>>>>    #include <asm/arch_def.h>
>>>>    #include "vm.h"
>>>> +#include "stsi.h"
>>>>    /**
>>>>     * Detect whether we are running with TCG (instead of KVM)
>>>
>>> We could add a fc < 3 check to the vm_is_tcg() function and add a
>>
>> OK
>>
>>> vm_is_lpar() which does a simple fc ==1 check.
>>
>> hum, the doc says 1 is basic, 2 is lpar, 3 is vm, shouldn't we
>> do a check on fc == 2 or have a vm_is_vm checking fc < 3 ?
>>
> 
> Right
> I'll do some tests on the lpar stsi output and have a look what we get 
> back.
> 
>> Do you have an experimental return on this?
> 
> ENOPARSE

:) you just answered.
I wanted to ask if you did tests which gave you "1" as result.


-- 
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen