From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] vfio-ccw fixes for 5.20
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 18:05:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220728160550.2119289-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Matt, Alex,
Here is an updated series for the DMA UNMAP length problem.
As before, it is built on Alex' vfio-next tree, and contains
two small fixes identified while testing this.
Changelog:
v1->v2:
- [MR] Rework the boundary checking of page_array_iova_pinned,
to compare against pfns instead of iovas.
- [MR] Add r-b to Patch 2 (Thank you!)
- [EF] (NEW) Noticed a missing return code check in the close routine
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220726150123.2567761-1-farman@linux.ibm.com/
Eric Farman (3):
vfio/ccw: Add length to DMA_UNMAP checks
vfio/ccw: Remove FSM Close from remove handlers
vfio/ccw: Check return code from subchannel quiesce
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 14 ++++++++++----
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h | 2 +-
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 1 -
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 2 +-
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 4 +---
5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-07-28 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-28 16:05 Eric Farman [this message]
2022-07-28 16:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] vfio/ccw: Add length to DMA_UNMAP checks Eric Farman
2022-07-28 19:50 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-07-28 20:34 ` Eric Farman
2022-07-28 16:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] vfio/ccw: Remove FSM Close from remove handlers Eric Farman
2022-07-28 16:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] vfio/ccw: Check return code from subchannel quiesce Eric Farman
2022-07-28 19:38 ` Matthew Rosato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220728160550.2119289-1-farman@linux.ibm.com \
--to=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox