From: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
nsg@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 1/1] s390x: fix make standalone
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 15:48:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230104144844.ldhurl73imixvrx2@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230104120720.0d3490bd@p-imbrenda>
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 12:07:20PM +0100, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 19:41:12 +0100
> Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:14:52AM +0100, Nico Boehr wrote:
> > > Quoting Nico Boehr (2022-12-21 09:16:51)
> > > > Quoting Claudio Imbrenda (2022-12-20 18:55:08)
> > > > > A recent patch broke make standalone. The function find_word is not
> > > > > available when running make standalone, replace it with a simple grep.
> > > > >
> > > > > Reported-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > Fixes: 743cacf7 ("s390x: don't run migration tests under PV")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> > > >
> > > > I am confused why find_word would not be available in standalone, since run() in runtime.bash uses it quite a few times.
> > > >
> > > > Not that I mind the grep, but I fear more might be broken in standalone?
> >
> > standalone tests don't currently include scripts/$ARCH/func.bash, which
> > may be an issue for s390x. That could be fixed, though.
> >
> > > >
> > > > Anyways, to get this fixed ASAP:
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> > >
> > > OK, I get it now, find_word is not available during _build time_.
> >
> > That could be changed, but it'd need to be moved to somewhere that
> > mkstandalone.sh wants to source, which could be common.bash, but
> > then we'd need to include common.bash in the standalone tests. So,
> > a new file for find_word() would be cleaner, but that sounds like
> > overkill.
>
> the hack I posted here was meant to be "clean enough" and
> arch-only (since we are the only ones with this issue). To be
> honest, I don't really care __how__ we fix the problem, only that we do
> fix it :)
>
> what do you think would be the cleanest solution?
A new file, but, like I said, that may be overkill at this time.
Thanks,
drew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-20 17:55 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 1/1] s390x: fix make standalone Claudio Imbrenda
2022-12-21 8:16 ` Nico Boehr
2022-12-21 9:14 ` Nico Boehr
2022-12-26 18:41 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-03 14:04 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-03 14:29 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-04 11:07 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-01-04 12:56 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-04 14:48 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2022-12-26 18:36 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-04 12:52 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-04 14:49 ` Andrew Jones
2023-01-03 14:05 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230104144844.ldhurl73imixvrx2@orel \
--to=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox