From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Christoffer Dall <c.dall@virtualopensystems.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Retry fault if vma_lookup() results become invalid
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:54:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230313235454.2964067-1-dmatlack@google.com> (raw)
Read mmu_invalidate_seq before dropping the mmap_lock so that KVM can
detect if the results of vma_lookup() (e.g. vma_shift) become stale
before it acquires kvm->mmu_lock. This fixes a theoretical bug where a
VMA could be changed by userspace after vma_lookup() and before KVM
reads the mmu_invalidate_seq, causing KVM to install page table entries
based on a (possibly) no-longer-valid vma_shift.
Re-order the MMU cache top-up to earlier in user_mem_abort() so that it
is not done after KVM has read mmu_invalidate_seq (i.e. so as to avoid
inducing spurious fault retries).
This bug has existed since KVM/ARM's inception. It's unlikely that any
sane userspace currently modifies VMAs in such a way as to trigger this
race. And even with directed testing I was unable to reproduce it. But a
sufficiently motivated host userspace might be able to exploit this
race.
Fixes: 94f8e6418d39 ("KVM: ARM: Handle guest faults in KVM")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index 7113587222ff..f54408355d1d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1217,6 +1217,20 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
return -EFAULT;
}
+ /*
+ * Permission faults just need to update the existing leaf entry,
+ * and so normally don't require allocations from the memcache. The
+ * only exception to this is when dirty logging is enabled at runtime
+ * and a write fault needs to collapse a block entry into a table.
+ */
+ if (fault_status != ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM ||
+ (logging_active && write_fault)) {
+ ret = kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(memcache,
+ kvm_mmu_cache_min_pages(kvm));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
/*
* Let's check if we will get back a huge page backed by hugetlbfs, or
* get block mapping for device MMIO region.
@@ -1269,37 +1283,17 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
fault_ipa &= ~(vma_pagesize - 1);
gfn = fault_ipa >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
-
- /*
- * Permission faults just need to update the existing leaf entry,
- * and so normally don't require allocations from the memcache. The
- * only exception to this is when dirty logging is enabled at runtime
- * and a write fault needs to collapse a block entry into a table.
- */
- if (fault_status != ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM ||
- (logging_active && write_fault)) {
- ret = kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(memcache,
- kvm_mmu_cache_min_pages(kvm));
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- }
- mmu_seq = vcpu->kvm->mmu_invalidate_seq;
/*
- * Ensure the read of mmu_invalidate_seq happens before we call
- * gfn_to_pfn_prot (which calls get_user_pages), so that we don't risk
- * the page we just got a reference to gets unmapped before we have a
- * chance to grab the mmu_lock, which ensure that if the page gets
- * unmapped afterwards, the call to kvm_unmap_gfn will take it away
- * from us again properly. This smp_rmb() interacts with the smp_wmb()
- * in kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_<page|range_end>.
+ * Read mmu_invalidate_seq so that KVM can detect if the results of
+ * vma_lookup() or __gfn_to_pfn_memslot() become stale prior to
+ * acquiring kvm->mmu_lock.
*
- * Besides, __gfn_to_pfn_memslot() instead of gfn_to_pfn_prot() is
- * used to avoid unnecessary overhead introduced to locate the memory
- * slot because it's always fixed even @gfn is adjusted for huge pages.
+ * Rely on mmap_read_unlock() for an implicit smp_rmb(), which pairs
+ * with the smp_wmb() in kvm_mmu_invalidate_end().
*/
- smp_rmb();
+ mmu_seq = vcpu->kvm->mmu_invalidate_seq;
+ mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
pfn = __gfn_to_pfn_memslot(memslot, gfn, false, false, NULL,
write_fault, &writable, NULL);
base-commit: 96a4627dbbd48144a65af936b321701c70876026
--
2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-13 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-13 23:54 David Matlack [this message]
2023-03-14 16:31 ` [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Retry fault if vma_lookup() results become invalid Marc Zyngier
2023-03-14 16:46 ` Oliver Upton
2023-03-14 18:10 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230313235454.2964067-1-dmatlack@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=c.dall@virtualopensystems.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox