From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH kvmtool 0/2] Fix virtio/rng handling in low entropy situations
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 17:57:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230413165757.1728800-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> (raw)
At the moment kvmtool uses the /dev/random device to back the randomness
provided by our virtio/rng implementation. We run it in non-blocking
mode, so are not affected by the nasty "can block indefinitely"
behaviour of that file. However:
- If /dev/random WOULD block, it returns EAGAIN, and we reflect that by
adding 0 bytes of entropy to the virtio queue. However the virtio 1.x
spec clearly says this is not allowed, and that we should always provide
at least one random byte.
- If the guest is waiting for the random numbers, we still run into an
effective blocking situation, because the buffer will only be filled
very slowly, effectively stalling or blocking the guest. EDK II shows
that behaviour, when servicing the EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL runtime service
call, called by the kernel very early on boot.
Those two patches fix those problems, and allow to boot a Linux kernel
MUCH quicker when the host lacks good entropy sources. On a particular
system the kernel took 10 minutes to boot because of /dev/random
effectively blocking, this runs now in full speed.
The block is avoided by using /dev/urandom, there is a proper rabbit
hole in the internet out there why this is safe, even for cryptographic
applications.
I am not sure we now really need patch 2 anymore (originally I had this
one before I switched to /dev/urandom). I *think* even a read from
/dev/urandom can return early (because of a signal, for instance), so
a return with 0 bytes read seems possible.
Please have a look!
Cheers,
Andre
Andre Przywara (2):
virtio/rng: switch to using /dev/urandom
virtio/rng: return at least one byte of entropy
virtio/rng.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-04-13 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-13 16:57 Andre Przywara [this message]
2023-04-13 16:57 ` [PATCH kvmtool 1/2] virtio/rng: switch to using /dev/urandom Andre Przywara
2023-04-19 13:53 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2023-04-13 16:57 ` [RFC PATCH kvmtool 2/2] virtio/rng: return at least one byte of entropy Andre Przywara
2023-04-19 13:58 ` [PATCH kvmtool 0/2] Fix virtio/rng handling in low entropy situations Jean-Philippe Brucker
2023-04-19 15:10 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2023-04-19 15:31 ` Andre Przywara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230413165757.1728800-1-andre.przywara@arm.com \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sami.mujawar@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox