From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH kvmtool 1/2] virtio/rng: switch to using /dev/urandom
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 17:57:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230413165757.1728800-2-andre.przywara@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230413165757.1728800-1-andre.przywara@arm.com>
At the moment we use /dev/random as the backing device to provide random
numbers to our virtio-rng implementation. The downside of doing so is
that it may block indefinitely - or return EAGAIN repeatedly in our case.
On one headless systbem without ample noise sources (no keyboard, mouse,
or network traffic) I measured 30 seconds to gain one byte of randomness.
At the moment EDK II insists in waiting for all of the requsted random
bytes (for its EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL runtime service) to arrive, that held up
a Linux kernel boot for more than 10 minutes(!).
According to the Internet(TM), on Linux /dev/urandom provides the same
quality random numbers as /dev/random, it just does not block when the
entropy estimation algorithm suggests so. For all practical purposes the
recommendation is to just use /dev/urandom, QEMU did the switch as well
in 2019 [1].
Use /dev/urandom instead of /dev/random when opening the file descriptor
providing the randomness source for the virtio/rng implementation.
[1] https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/a2230bd778d8
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
virtio/rng.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/virtio/rng.c b/virtio/rng.c
index 8f85d5ec1..eab8f3ac0 100644
--- a/virtio/rng.c
+++ b/virtio/rng.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ int virtio_rng__init(struct kvm *kvm)
if (rdev == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
- rdev->fd = open("/dev/random", O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
+ rdev->fd = open("/dev/urandom", O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
if (rdev->fd < 0) {
r = rdev->fd;
goto cleanup;
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-13 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-13 16:57 [PATCH kvmtool 0/2] Fix virtio/rng handling in low entropy situations Andre Przywara
2023-04-13 16:57 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2023-04-19 13:53 ` [PATCH kvmtool 1/2] virtio/rng: switch to using /dev/urandom Jean-Philippe Brucker
2023-04-13 16:57 ` [RFC PATCH kvmtool 2/2] virtio/rng: return at least one byte of entropy Andre Przywara
2023-04-19 13:58 ` [PATCH kvmtool 0/2] Fix virtio/rng handling in low entropy situations Jean-Philippe Brucker
2023-04-19 15:10 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2023-04-19 15:31 ` Andre Przywara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230413165757.1728800-2-andre.przywara@arm.com \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sami.mujawar@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox