From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, sgarzare@redhat.com
Subject: Re: VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO capability struct alignment
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:17:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230801101730.607d96ab.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230801153846.GA1371443@fedora>
On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 11:38:46 -0400
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> It appears that ioctl(VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO) can produce misaligned
> capability structures. Userspace workarounds exist but I wanted to ask
> whether the kernel can align capability structures to save all userspace
> programs the trouble?
>
> The issue is:
>
> struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_dma_avail {
> struct vfio_info_cap_header header; /* 0 8 */
> __u32 avail; /* 8 4 */
>
> /* size: 12, cachelines: 1, members: 2 */
> /* last cacheline: 12 bytes */
> };
>
> Once this capability is added, the next capability will be 4-byte
> aligned but not 8-byte aligned. If there are __u64 fields in the next
> capability, then they will be misaligned.
>
> This was noticed when investigating a bug in userspace code that uses
> ioctl(VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO):
> https://gitlab.com/pci-driver/pci-driver/-/merge_requests/2#note_1495734084
>
> One possible solution is to modify vfio_info_cap_add() so that
> capability structures are always rounded up to 8 bytes. This does not
> break the uapi because capability structure offsets are described at
> runtime via the cap_offset and header->next fields. Existing userspace
> programs would continue to work and all programs would find that
> capability structures are now aligned.
Yes, I think the helpers should automatically align each added
capability. Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-01 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-01 15:38 VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO capability struct alignment Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-01 16:17 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2023-08-01 19:24 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230801101730.607d96ab.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox