From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, sgarzare@redhat.com
Subject: Re: VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO capability struct alignment
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 15:24:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230801192443.GB1414936@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230801101730.607d96ab.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1741 bytes --]
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 10:17:30AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 11:38:46 -0400
> Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > It appears that ioctl(VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO) can produce misaligned
> > capability structures. Userspace workarounds exist but I wanted to ask
> > whether the kernel can align capability structures to save all userspace
> > programs the trouble?
> >
> > The issue is:
> >
> > struct vfio_iommu_type1_info_dma_avail {
> > struct vfio_info_cap_header header; /* 0 8 */
> > __u32 avail; /* 8 4 */
> >
> > /* size: 12, cachelines: 1, members: 2 */
> > /* last cacheline: 12 bytes */
> > };
> >
> > Once this capability is added, the next capability will be 4-byte
> > aligned but not 8-byte aligned. If there are __u64 fields in the next
> > capability, then they will be misaligned.
> >
> > This was noticed when investigating a bug in userspace code that uses
> > ioctl(VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO):
> > https://gitlab.com/pci-driver/pci-driver/-/merge_requests/2#note_1495734084
> >
> > One possible solution is to modify vfio_info_cap_add() so that
> > capability structures are always rounded up to 8 bytes. This does not
> > break the uapi because capability structure offsets are described at
> > runtime via the cap_offset and header->next fields. Existing userspace
> > programs would continue to work and all programs would find that
> > capability structures are now aligned.
>
> Yes, I think the helpers should automatically align each added
> capability. Thanks,
Thanks, I will give it a try and post a patch.
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-01 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-01 15:38 VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO capability struct alignment Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-01 16:17 ` Alex Williamson
2023-08-01 19:24 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230801192443.GB1414936@fedora \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox