From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, kevin.tian@intel.com, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
zhenzhong.duan@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu: Undo pasid attachment only for the devices that have succeeded
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 10:05:01 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327130501.GF946323@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240327125433.248946-3-yi.l.liu@intel.com>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 05:54:33AM -0700, Yi Liu wrote:
> There is no error handling now in __iommu_set_group_pasid(), it relies on
> its caller to loop all the devices to undo the pasid attachment. This is
> not self-contained and has unnecessary remove_dev_pasid() calls on the
> devices that have not changed in the __iommu_set_group_pasid() call. this
> results in unnecessary warnings by the underlying iommu drivers. Like the
> Intel iommu driver, it would warn when there is no pasid attachment to
> destroy in the remove_dev_pasid() callback.
>
> The ideal way is to handle the error within __iommu_set_group_pasid(). This
> not only makes __iommu_set_group_pasid() self-contained, but also avoids
> unnecessary warnings.
>
> Fixes: 16603704559c7a68 ("iommu: Add attach/detach_dev_pasid iommu interfaces")
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
This will need revising when we get to PASID replace, but good enough
for now
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-27 12:54 [PATCH 0/2] Two enhancements to iommu_at[de]tach_device_pasid() Yi Liu
2024-03-27 12:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu: Pass domain to remove_dev_pasid() op Yi Liu
2024-03-27 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-03-27 13:10 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-28 12:38 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-28 3:12 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-03-28 6:28 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-27 12:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu: Undo pasid attachment only for the devices that have succeeded Yi Liu
2024-03-27 13:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-03-27 13:12 ` Yi Liu
2024-03-28 3:15 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-03-28 6:29 ` Yi Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240327130501.GF946323@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox