From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] KVM: VMX: Handle MMIO Stale Data in VM-Enter assembly via ALTERNATIVES_2
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 15:01:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251112230138.nepccbv3wf5em5ra@desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aRTubGCENf2oypeL@google.com>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 12:30:36PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> VMX "needs" to abuse RFLAGS no matter what, because RFLAGS is the only register
> that's available at the time of VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME. On Intel, only RSP and
> RFLAGS are context switched via the VMCS, all other GPRs need to be context
> switch by software. Which is why I didn't balk at Pawan's idea to use RFLAGS.ZF
> to track whether or not a VERW for MMIO is needed.
>
> Hmm, actually, @flags is already on the stack because it's needed at VM-Exit.
> Using EBX was a holdover from the conversion from inline asm to "proper" asm,
> e.g. from commit 77df549559db ("KVM: VMX: Pass @launched to the vCPU-run asm via
> standard ABI regs").
>
> Oooh, and if we stop using bt+RFLAGS.CF, then we drop the annoying SHIFT definitions
> in arch/x86/kvm/vmx/run_flags.h.
>
> Very lightly tested at this point, but I think this can all be simplified to
>
> /*
> * Note, ALTERNATIVE_2 works in reverse order. If CLEAR_CPU_BUF_VM is
> * enabled, do VERW unconditionally. If CPU_BUF_VM_MMIO is enabled,
> * check @flags to see if the vCPU has access to host MMIO, and do VERW
> * if so. Else, do nothing (no mitigations needed/enabled).
> */
> ALTERNATIVE_2 "", \
> __stringify(testl $VMX_RUN_CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS_FOR_MMIO, WORD_SIZE(%_ASM_SP); \
WORD_SIZE(%_ASM_SP) is still a bit fragile, but this is definitely an
improvement.
> jz .Lskip_clear_cpu_buffers; \
> VERW; \
> .Lskip_clear_cpu_buffers:), \
> X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF_VM_MMIO, \
> __stringify(VERW), X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF_VM
>
> /* Check if vmlaunch or vmresume is needed */
> testl $VMX_RUN_VMRESUME, WORD_SIZE(%_ASM_SP)
> jz .Lvmlaunch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-31 0:30 [PATCH v4 0/8] x86/bugs: KVM: L1TF and MMIO Stale Data cleanups Sean Christopherson
2025-10-31 0:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] x86/bugs: Use VM_CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS in VMX as well Sean Christopherson
2025-10-31 11:30 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-11-01 1:46 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-03 18:18 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-07 19:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-11-11 22:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-12 10:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-11-12 18:19 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-12 18:17 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-07 18:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-11-12 18:02 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-31 0:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] x86/bugs: Decouple ALTERNATIVE usage from VERW macro definition Sean Christopherson
2025-10-31 11:37 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-10-31 17:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-01 4:13 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-03 17:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-03 17:40 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-12 12:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-31 0:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] x86/bugs: Use an X86_FEATURE_xxx flag for the MMIO Stale Data mitigation Sean Christopherson
2025-10-31 11:44 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-10-31 21:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-03 10:49 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-10-31 22:28 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-31 22:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-31 22:50 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-12 14:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-11-12 18:24 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-31 0:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] KVM: VMX: Handle MMIO Stale Data in VM-Enter assembly via ALTERNATIVES_2 Sean Christopherson
2025-10-31 12:32 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-10-31 21:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-03 10:51 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-10-31 23:55 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-01 3:41 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-03 9:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-11-03 17:37 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-03 17:46 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-12 16:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-11-12 17:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-12 18:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-11-12 20:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-12 23:01 ` Pawan Gupta [this message]
2025-11-13 14:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-11-13 22:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-31 0:30 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] x86/bugs: KVM: Move VM_CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS into SVM as SVM_CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS Sean Christopherson
2025-10-31 12:34 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-11-13 15:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-11-13 15:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-13 16:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-31 0:30 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] KVM: VMX: Bundle all L1 data cache flush mitigation code together Sean Christopherson
2025-11-03 18:26 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-31 0:30 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] KVM: VMX: Disable L1TF L1 data cache flush if CONFIG_CPU_MITIGATIONS=n Sean Christopherson
2025-10-31 12:37 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-10-31 0:30 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] KVM: x86: Unify L1TF flushing under per-CPU variable Sean Christopherson
2025-10-31 11:22 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] x86/bugs: KVM: L1TF and MMIO Stale Data cleanups Brendan Jackman
2025-10-31 17:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-04 10:58 ` Brendan Jackman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251112230138.nepccbv3wf5em5ra@desk \
--to=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox