public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com,
	rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, xiaoyao.li@intel.com,
	chao.gao@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com,
	binbin.wu@linux.intel.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 11/27] KVM: SVM: Drop unnecessary clears of unsupported common x86 features
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:35:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260417073610.3246316-12-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260417073610.3246316-1-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>

Remove kvm_cpu_cap_clear() calls for IBT, BUS_LOCK_DETECT, and MSR_IMM
in svm_set_cpu_caps() since they are not set in common code anymore.

Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index a21c500e1a91..ab3405640764 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -5445,8 +5445,6 @@ static __init void svm_set_cpu_caps(void)
 
 	kvm_caps.supported_perf_cap = 0;
 
-	kvm_cpu_cap_clear(X86_FEATURE_IBT, F_CPUID_SVM);
-
 	/* CPUID 0x80000001 and 0x8000000A (SVM features) */
 	if (nested) {
 		kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_SVM, F_CPUID_SVM);
@@ -5517,13 +5515,6 @@ static __init void svm_set_cpu_caps(void)
 	/* CPUID 0x8000001F (SME/SEV features) */
 	sev_set_cpu_caps();
 
-	/*
-	 * Clear capabilities that are automatically configured by common code,
-	 * but that require explicit SVM support (that isn't yet implemented).
-	 */
-	kvm_cpu_cap_clear(X86_FEATURE_BUS_LOCK_DETECT, F_CPUID_SVM);
-	kvm_cpu_cap_clear(X86_FEATURE_MSR_IMM, F_CPUID_SVM);
-
 	kvm_setup_xss_caps();
 	kvm_finalize_cpu_caps();
 }
-- 
2.46.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-17  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-17  7:35 [RFC PATCH 00/27] KVM: x86: Add a paranoid mode for CPUID verification Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 01/27] KVM: x86: Fix emulated CPUID features being applied to wrong sub-leaf Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 02/27] KVM: x86: Reorder the features for CPUID 7 Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 03/27] KVM: x86: Add definitions for CPUID overlays Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 04/27] KVM: x86: Extend F() and its variants " Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 05/27] KVM: x86: Extend kvm_cpu_cap_{set/clear}() to configure overlays Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 06/27] KVM: x86: Populate TDX CPUID overlay with supported feature bits Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 07/27] KVM: x86: Support KVM_GET_{SUPPORTED,EMULATED}_CPUID as VM scope ioctls Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 08/27] KVM: x86: Thread @kvm to KVM CPU capability helpers Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 09/27] KVM: x86: Use overlays of KVM CPU capabilities Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 10/27] KVM: x86: Use vendor-specific overlay flags instead of F_CPUID_DEFAULT Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` Binbin Wu [this message]
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 12/27] KVM: x86: Split KVM CPU cap leafs into two parts Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 13/27] KVM: x86: Add a helper to initialize CPUID multi-bit fields Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 14/27] KVM: x86: Add a helper to init multiple feature bits based on raw CPUID Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 15/27] KVM: x86: Add infrastructure to track CPUID entries ignored in paranoid mode Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 16/27] KVM: x86: Init allowed masks for basic CPUID range " Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 17/27] KVM: x86: Init allowed masks for extended " Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 18/27] KVM: x86: Handle Centaur CPUID leafs " Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 19/27] KVM: x86: Track KVM PV CPUID features for " Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 20/27] KVM: x86: Add per-VM flag to track CPUID " Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 21/27] KVM: x86: Make kvm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid() return an error code Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 22/27] KVM: x86: Verify userspace CPUID inputs in paranoid mode Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 23/27] KVM: x86: Account for runtime CPUID features " Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 24/27] KVM: x86: Skip paranoid CPUID check for KVM PV leafs when base is relocated Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 25/27] KVM: x86: Add new KVM_CAP_X86_CPUID_PARANOID Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 26/27] KVM: x86: Add a helper to query the allowed CPUID mask Binbin Wu
2026-04-17  7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 27/27] KVM: TDX: Replace hardcoded CPUID filtering with the allowed mask Binbin Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260417073610.3246316-12-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox