From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jon@nutanix.com, d.riley@proxmox.com
Subject: [PATCH 08/28] KVM: x86/mmu: introduce ACC_READ_MASK
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:09:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260428110946.11466-9-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260428110946.11466-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Read permissions so far were only needed for EPT, which does not need
ACC_USER_MASK. Therefore, for EPT page tables ACC_USER_MASK was repurposed
as a read permission bit.
In order to implement nested MBEC, EPT will genuinely have four kinds of
accesses, and there will be no room for such hacks; bite the bullet at
last, enlarging ACC_ALL to four bits and permissions[] to 2^4 bits (u16).
The new code does not enforce that the XWR bits on non-execonly processors
have their R bit set, even when running nested: none of the shadow_*_mask
values have bit 0 set, and make_spte() genuinely relies on ACC_READ_MASK
being requested! This works because, if execonly is not supported by the
processor, shadow EPT will generate an EPT misconfig vmexit if the XWR
bits represent a non-readable page, and therefore the pte_access argument
to make_spte() will also always have ACC_READ_MASK set.
Tested-by: David Riley <d.riley@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 12 +++++-----
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++------------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 18 ++++++---------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 5 +++--
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h | 5 -----
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h | 5 +----
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 3 +--
10 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index c470e40a00aa..8f2a1b915df9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -328,11 +328,11 @@ struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry;
* the number of unique SPs that can theoretically be created is 2^n, where n
* is the number of bits that are used to compute the role.
*
- * But, even though there are 20 bits in the mask below, not all combinations
+ * But, even though there are 21 bits in the mask below, not all combinations
* of modes and flags are possible:
*
* - invalid shadow pages are not accounted, mirror pages are not shadowed,
- * so the bits are effectively 18.
+ * so the bits are effectively 19.
*
* - quadrant will only be used if has_4_byte_gpte=1 (non-PAE paging);
* execonly and ad_disabled are only used for nested EPT which has
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry;
* cr0_wp=0, therefore these three bits only give rise to 5 possibilities.
*
* Therefore, the maximum number of possible upper-level shadow pages for a
- * single gfn is a bit less than 2^13.
+ * single gfn is a bit less than 2^14.
*/
union kvm_mmu_page_role {
u32 word;
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ union kvm_mmu_page_role {
unsigned has_4_byte_gpte:1;
unsigned quadrant:2;
unsigned direct:1;
- unsigned access:3;
+ unsigned access:4;
unsigned invalid:1;
unsigned efer_nx:1;
unsigned cr0_wp:1;
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ union kvm_mmu_page_role {
unsigned guest_mode:1;
unsigned passthrough:1;
unsigned is_mirror:1;
- unsigned :4;
+ unsigned:3;
/*
* This is left at the top of the word so that
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ struct kvm_mmu {
* Byte index: page fault error code [4:1]
* Bit index: pte permissions in ACC_* format
*/
- u8 permissions[16];
+ u16 permissions[16];
u64 *pae_root;
u64 *pml4_root;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
index 830f46145692..23f37535c0ce 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ u8 kvm_mmu_get_max_tdp_level(void);
void kvm_mmu_set_mmio_spte_mask(u64 mmio_value, u64 mmio_mask, u64 access_mask);
void kvm_mmu_set_mmio_spte_value(struct kvm *kvm, u64 mmio_value);
void kvm_mmu_set_me_spte_mask(u64 me_value, u64 me_mask);
-void kvm_mmu_set_ept_masks(bool has_ad_bits, bool has_exec_only);
+void kvm_mmu_set_ept_masks(bool has_ad_bits);
void kvm_init_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_init_shadow_npt_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr0,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 70fd6868a555..cd1f8a51867d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -2033,7 +2033,7 @@ static bool kvm_sync_page_check(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
*/
const union kvm_mmu_page_role sync_role_ign = {
.level = 0xf,
- .access = 0x7,
+ .access = ACC_ALL,
.quadrant = 0x3,
.passthrough = 0x1,
};
@@ -5539,7 +5539,7 @@ reset_ept_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct kvm_mmu *context, bool execonly)
* update_permission_bitmask() builds what is effectively a
* two-dimensional array of bools. The second dimension is
* provided by individual bits of permissions[pfec >> 1], and
- * logical &, | and ~ operations operate on all the 8 possible
+ * logical &, | and ~ operations operate on all the 16 possible
* combinations of ACC_* bits.
*/
#define ACC_BITS_MASK(access) \
@@ -5549,15 +5549,24 @@ reset_ept_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct kvm_mmu *context, bool execonly)
(4 & (access) ? 1 << 4 : 0) | \
(5 & (access) ? 1 << 5 : 0) | \
(6 & (access) ? 1 << 6 : 0) | \
- (7 & (access) ? 1 << 7 : 0))
+ (7 & (access) ? 1 << 7 : 0) | \
+ (8 & (access) ? 1 << 8 : 0) | \
+ (9 & (access) ? 1 << 9 : 0) | \
+ (10 & (access) ? 1 << 10 : 0) | \
+ (11 & (access) ? 1 << 11 : 0) | \
+ (12 & (access) ? 1 << 12 : 0) | \
+ (13 & (access) ? 1 << 13 : 0) | \
+ (14 & (access) ? 1 << 14 : 0) | \
+ (15 & (access) ? 1 << 15 : 0))
static void update_permission_bitmask(struct kvm_mmu *mmu, bool ept)
{
unsigned byte;
- const u8 x = ACC_BITS_MASK(ACC_EXEC_MASK);
- const u8 w = ACC_BITS_MASK(ACC_WRITE_MASK);
- const u8 u = ACC_BITS_MASK(ACC_USER_MASK);
+ const u16 x = ACC_BITS_MASK(ACC_EXEC_MASK);
+ const u16 w = ACC_BITS_MASK(ACC_WRITE_MASK);
+ const u16 u = ACC_BITS_MASK(ACC_USER_MASK);
+ const u16 r = ACC_BITS_MASK(ACC_READ_MASK);
bool cr4_smep = is_cr4_smep(mmu);
bool cr4_smap = is_cr4_smap(mmu);
@@ -5580,24 +5589,26 @@ static void update_permission_bitmask(struct kvm_mmu *mmu, bool ept)
unsigned pfec = byte << 1;
/*
- * Each "*f" variable has a 1 bit for each UWX value
+ * Each "*f" variable has a 1 bit for each ACC_* combo
* that causes a fault with the given PFEC.
*/
+ /* Faults from reads to non-readable pages */
+ u16 rf = (pfec & (PFERR_WRITE_MASK|PFERR_FETCH_MASK)) ? 0 : (u16)~r;
/* Faults from writes to non-writable pages */
- u8 wf = (pfec & PFERR_WRITE_MASK) ? (u8)~w : 0;
+ u16 wf = (pfec & PFERR_WRITE_MASK) ? (u16)~w : 0;
/* Faults from user mode accesses to supervisor pages */
- u8 uf = (pfec & PFERR_USER_MASK) ? (u8)~u : 0;
+ u16 uf = (pfec & PFERR_USER_MASK) ? (u16)~u : 0;
/* Faults from fetches of non-executable pages*/
- u8 ff = (pfec & PFERR_FETCH_MASK) ? (u8)~x : 0;
+ u16 ff = (pfec & PFERR_FETCH_MASK) ? (u16)~x : 0;
/* Faults from kernel mode fetches of user pages */
- u8 smepf = 0;
+ u16 smepf = 0;
/* Faults from kernel mode accesses of user pages */
- u8 smapf = 0;
+ u16 smapf = 0;
if (!ept) {
/* Faults from kernel mode accesses to user pages */
- u8 kf = (pfec & PFERR_USER_MASK) ? 0 : u;
+ u16 kf = (pfec & PFERR_USER_MASK) ? 0 : u;
/* Not really needed: !nx will cause pte.nx to fault */
if (!efer_nx)
@@ -5630,7 +5641,7 @@ static void update_permission_bitmask(struct kvm_mmu *mmu, bool ept)
smapf = (pfec & (PFERR_RSVD_MASK|PFERR_FETCH_MASK)) ? 0 : kf;
}
- mmu->permissions[byte] = ff | uf | wf | smepf | smapf;
+ mmu->permissions[byte] = ff | uf | wf | rf | smepf | smapf;
}
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h
index 764e3015d021..dcfdfedfc4e9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h
@@ -25,7 +25,8 @@
#define KVM_MMU_PAGE_PRINTK() ({ \
const char *saved_ptr = trace_seq_buffer_ptr(p); \
static const char *access_str[] = { \
- "---", "--x", "w--", "w-x", "-u-", "-ux", "wu-", "wux" \
+ "----", "r---", "-w--", "rw--", "--u-", "r-u-", "-wu-", "rwu-", \
+ "---x", "r--x", "-w-x", "rw-x", "--ux", "r-ux", "-wux", "rwux" \
}; \
union kvm_mmu_page_role role; \
\
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
index 901cd2bd40b8..fb1b5d8b23e5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -170,25 +170,24 @@ static bool FNAME(prefetch_invalid_gpte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return true;
}
-/*
- * For PTTYPE_EPT, a page table can be executable but not readable
- * on supported processors. Therefore, set_spte does not automatically
- * set bit 0 if execute only is supported. Here, we repurpose ACC_USER_MASK
- * to signify readability since it isn't used in the EPT case
- */
static inline unsigned FNAME(gpte_access)(u64 gpte)
{
unsigned access;
#if PTTYPE == PTTYPE_EPT
access = ((gpte & VMX_EPT_WRITABLE_MASK) ? ACC_WRITE_MASK : 0) |
((gpte & VMX_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK) ? ACC_EXEC_MASK : 0) |
- ((gpte & VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK) ? ACC_USER_MASK : 0);
+ ((gpte & VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK) ? ACC_READ_MASK : 0);
#else
- BUILD_BUG_ON(ACC_EXEC_MASK != PT_PRESENT_MASK);
- BUILD_BUG_ON(ACC_EXEC_MASK != 1);
+ /*
+ * P is set here, so the page is always readable and W/U/!NX represent
+ * allowed accesses.
+ */
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(ACC_READ_MASK != PT_PRESENT_MASK);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(ACC_WRITE_MASK != PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(ACC_USER_MASK != PT_USER_MASK);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(ACC_EXEC_MASK & (PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_USER_MASK | PT_PRESENT_MASK));
access = gpte & (PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_USER_MASK | PT_PRESENT_MASK);
- /* Combine NX with P (which is set here) to get ACC_EXEC_MASK. */
- access ^= (gpte >> PT64_NX_SHIFT);
+ access |= gpte & PT64_NX_MASK ? 0 : ACC_EXEC_MASK;
#endif
return access;
@@ -501,10 +500,18 @@ static int FNAME(walk_addr_generic)(struct guest_walker *walker,
if (write_fault)
walker->fault.exit_qualification |= EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_WRITE;
- if (user_fault)
- walker->fault.exit_qualification |= EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_READ;
- if (fetch_fault)
+ else if (fetch_fault)
walker->fault.exit_qualification |= EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_INSTR;
+ else
+ walker->fault.exit_qualification |= EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_READ;
+
+ /*
+ * Accesses to guest paging structures are either "reads" or
+ * "read+write" accesses, so consider them the latter if write_fault
+ * is true.
+ */
+ if (access & PFERR_GUEST_PAGE_MASK)
+ walker->fault.exit_qualification |= EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_READ;
/*
* Note, pte_access holds the raw RWX bits from the EPTE, not
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index e9dc0ae44274..7b5f118ae211 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -194,12 +194,6 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
int is_host_mmio = -1;
bool wrprot = false;
- /*
- * For the EPT case, shadow_present_mask has no RWX bits set if
- * exec-only page table entries are supported. In that case,
- * ACC_USER_MASK and shadow_user_mask are used to represent
- * read access. See FNAME(gpte_access) in paging_tmpl.h.
- */
WARN_ON_ONCE((pte_access | shadow_present_mask) == SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
if (sp->role.ad_disabled)
@@ -228,6 +222,9 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
pte_access &= ~ACC_EXEC_MASK;
}
+ if (pte_access & ACC_READ_MASK)
+ spte |= PT_PRESENT_MASK; /* or VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK */
+
if (pte_access & ACC_EXEC_MASK)
spte |= shadow_x_mask;
else
@@ -391,6 +388,7 @@ u64 make_nonleaf_spte(u64 *child_pt, bool ad_disabled)
u64 spte = SPTE_MMU_PRESENT_MASK;
spte |= __pa(child_pt) | shadow_present_mask | PT_WRITABLE_MASK |
+ PT_PRESENT_MASK /* or VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK */ |
shadow_user_mask | shadow_x_mask | shadow_me_value;
if (ad_disabled)
@@ -491,18 +489,16 @@ void kvm_mmu_set_me_spte_mask(u64 me_value, u64 me_mask)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM_INTERNAL(kvm_mmu_set_me_spte_mask);
-void kvm_mmu_set_ept_masks(bool has_ad_bits, bool has_exec_only)
+void kvm_mmu_set_ept_masks(bool has_ad_bits)
{
kvm_ad_enabled = has_ad_bits;
- shadow_user_mask = VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK;
+ shadow_user_mask = 0;
shadow_accessed_mask = VMX_EPT_ACCESS_BIT;
shadow_dirty_mask = VMX_EPT_DIRTY_BIT;
shadow_nx_mask = 0ull;
shadow_x_mask = VMX_EPT_EXECUTABLE_MASK;
- /* VMX_EPT_SUPPRESS_VE_BIT is needed for W or X violation. */
- shadow_present_mask =
- (has_exec_only ? 0ull : VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK) | VMX_EPT_SUPPRESS_VE_BIT;
+ shadow_present_mask = VMX_EPT_SUPPRESS_VE_BIT;
shadow_acc_track_mask = VMX_EPT_RWX_MASK;
shadow_host_writable_mask = EPT_SPTE_HOST_WRITABLE;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index ac957bd7dab0..c0055ede0132 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -52,10 +52,11 @@ static_assert(SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED == 0);
#define SPTE_BASE_ADDR_MASK (((1ULL << 52) - 1) & ~(u64)(PAGE_SIZE-1))
#endif
-#define ACC_EXEC_MASK 1
+#define ACC_READ_MASK PT_PRESENT_MASK
#define ACC_WRITE_MASK PT_WRITABLE_MASK
#define ACC_USER_MASK PT_USER_MASK
-#define ACC_ALL (ACC_EXEC_MASK | ACC_WRITE_MASK | ACC_USER_MASK)
+#define ACC_EXEC_MASK 8
+#define ACC_ALL (ACC_EXEC_MASK | ACC_WRITE_MASK | ACC_USER_MASK | ACC_READ_MASK)
#define SPTE_LEVEL_BITS 9
#define SPTE_LEVEL_SHIFT(level) __PT_LEVEL_SHIFT(level, SPTE_LEVEL_BITS)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
index 56cacc06225e..7e59eb0f41bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
@@ -300,11 +300,6 @@ static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_flexpriority(void)
cpu_has_vmx_virtualize_apic_accesses();
}
-static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_ept_execute_only(void)
-{
- return vmx_capability.ept & VMX_EPT_EXECUTE_ONLY_BIT;
-}
-
static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_ept_4levels(void)
{
return vmx_capability.ept & VMX_EPT_PAGE_WALK_4_BIT;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h
index adf925500b9e..1afbf272efae 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h
@@ -85,11 +85,8 @@ static inline int __vmx_handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
{
u64 error_code;
- /* Is it a read fault? */
- error_code = (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_READ)
- ? PFERR_USER_MASK : 0;
/* Is it a write fault? */
- error_code |= (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_WRITE)
+ error_code = (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_WRITE)
? PFERR_WRITE_MASK : 0;
/* Is it a fetch fault? */
error_code |= (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_INSTR)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index a29896a9ef14..337bbfecc021 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -8683,8 +8683,7 @@ __init int vmx_hardware_setup(void)
set_bit(0, vmx_vpid_bitmap); /* 0 is reserved for host */
if (enable_ept)
- kvm_mmu_set_ept_masks(enable_ept_ad_bits,
- cpu_has_vmx_ept_execute_only());
+ kvm_mmu_set_ept_masks(enable_ept_ad_bits);
else
vt_x86_ops.get_mt_mask = NULL;
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-28 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-28 11:09 [PATCH v4 00/28] KVM: combined patchset for MBEC/GMET support Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 01/28] KVM: TDX/VMX: rework EPT_VIOLATION_EXEC_FOR_RING3_LIN into PROT_MASK Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 02/28] KVM: x86/mmu: remove SPTE_PERM_MASK Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 03/28] KVM: x86/mmu: free up bit 10 of PTEs in preparation for MBEC Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 04/28] KVM: x86/mmu: shuffle high bits of SPTEs " Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 05/28] KVM: x86/mmu: remove SPTE_EPT_* Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 06/28] KVM: x86/mmu: merge make_spte_{non,}executable Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 07/28] KVM: x86/mmu: rename and clarify BYTE_MASK Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 09/28] KVM: x86/mmu: separate more EPT/non-EPT permission_fault() Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 10/28] KVM: x86/mmu: pass PFERR_GUEST_PAGE/FINAL_MASK to kvm_translate_gpa Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 11/28] KVM: x86/mmu: pass pte_access for final nGPA->GPA walk Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-29 7:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 12/28] KVM: x86: make translate_nested_gpa vendor-specific Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 13/28] KVM: x86/mmu: split XS/XU bits for EPT Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 14/28] KVM: x86/mmu: move cr4_smep to base role Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 15/28] KVM: VMX: enable use of MBEC Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 16/28] KVM: nVMX: pass advanced EPT violation vmexit info to guest Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 17/28] KVM: nVMX: pass PFERR_USER_MASK to MMU on EPT violations Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 18/28] KVM: x86/mmu: add support for MBEC to EPT page table walks Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 19/28] KVM: nVMX: advertise MBEC to nested guests Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 20/28] KVM: nVMX: allow MBEC with EVMCS Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 21/28] KVM: x86/mmu: propagate access mask from root pages down Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 22/28] KVM: x86/mmu: introduce cpu_role bit for availability of PFEC.I/D Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 23/28] KVM: SVM: add GMET bit definitions Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 24/28] KVM: x86/mmu: set CR0.WP=1 for shadow NPT MMU Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 25/28] KVM: x86/mmu: add support for GMET to NPT page table walks Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 26/28] KVM: SVM: enable GMET and set it in MMU role Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 27/28] KVM: SVM: work around errata 1218 Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 11:09 ` [PATCH 28/28] KVM: nSVM: enable GMET for guests Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-29 13:05 ` [PATCH v4 00/28] KVM: combined patchset for MBEC/GMET support David Riley
2026-04-29 13:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-30 10:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-30 12:08 ` David Riley
2026-05-05 1:14 ` Jon Kohler
2026-05-05 5:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260428110946.11466-9-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=d.riley@proxmox.com \
--cc=jon@nutanix.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox