Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/3] KVM: selftests: Add unit to dirty_log_test
       [not found] <202605111849442561v1a0B_7W1L2Z-ENusLaP@zte.com.cn>
@ 2026-05-11 11:23 ` wu.fei9
  2026-05-11 11:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] RISC-V: KVM: Fix skip of valid pages in kvm_riscv_gstage_wp_range wu.fei9
  2026-05-11 11:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] RISC-V: KVM: Fix skip of valid pages in kvm_riscv_gstage_unmap_range wu.fei9
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wu.fei9 @ 2026-05-11 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-riscv, linux-kernel, linux-kselftest, kvm, kvm-riscv
  Cc: anup, atish.patra, pjw, palmer, aou, alex, pbonzini, shuah,
	wu.fei9

Currently dirty_log_test hardcodes usleep 1ms in each interval, which
could be too short for guest to write and fault in enough pages, then
there is less chance to test the write protection mechanism, especially
in the case of (log_mode != LOG_MODE_DIRTY_RING).

Unit is introduced to replace the default 1ms if specified in command
line. The following test can't trigger failure on my riscv vm:

  # ./dirty_log_test -m 21 -M clear-log

By enlarging unit, it fails every time:

  # ./dirty_log_test -u 100 -m 21 -M clear-log
  Random seed: 0x6b8b4567
  Setting log mode to: 'clear-log'
  Test iterations: 32, interval: 10, unit: 100 (ms)
  Testing guest mode: PA-bits:50,  VA-bits:48,  4K pages
  guest physical test memory offset: 0x3ffffbfffc000
  Iteration  1: dirty: 262147 clean: 0      writes: 8454
  ==== Test Assertion Failure ====
    dirty_log_test.c:565: val < iteration
    pid=295 tid=295 errno=0 - Success
  sh: addr2line: not found
    Clear page 197160 value (2) >= iteration (2) (last = 18446744073709551615, prev_last = 18446744073709551615)

Signed-off-by: Wu Fei <wu.fei9@sanechips.com.cn>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c | 24 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c
index 12446a4b6e8d..06234a77f1c5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c
@@ -34,9 +34,12 @@
 /* How many host loops to run (one KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG for each loop) */
 #define TEST_HOST_LOOP_N               32UL

-/* Interval for each host loop (ms) */
+/* Interval for each host loop (number of units) */
 #define TEST_HOST_LOOP_INTERVAL                10UL

+/* ms per unit, one iteration takes (interval * unit) ms */
+#define TEST_HOST_LOOP_UNIT            1UL
+
 /*
  * Ensure the vCPU is able to perform a reasonable number of writes in each
  * iteration to provide a lower bound on coverage.
@@ -592,6 +595,7 @@ static struct kvm_vm *create_vm(enum vm_guest_mode mode, struct kvm_vcpu **vcpu,
 struct test_params {
        unsigned long iterations;
        unsigned long interval;
+       unsigned long unit;
        u64 phys_offset;
 };

@@ -718,7 +722,7 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
                         * and so that the test doesn't run too far beyond the
                         * specified interval.
                         */
-                       usleep(1000);
+                       usleep(1000 * p->unit);

                        sync_global_from_guest(vm, nr_writes);

@@ -807,7 +811,7 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
 static void help(char *name)
 {
        puts("");
-       printf("usage: %s [-h] [-i iterations] [-I interval] "
+       printf("usage: %s [-h] [-i iterations] [-I interval] [-u unit] "
               "[-p offset] [-m mode]\n", name);
        puts("");
        printf(" -c: hint to dirty ring size, in number of entries\n");
@@ -815,8 +819,9 @@ static void help(char *name)
               TEST_DIRTY_RING_COUNT);
        printf(" -i: specify iteration counts (default: %"PRIu64")\n",
               TEST_HOST_LOOP_N);
-       printf(" -I: specify interval in ms (default: %"PRIu64" ms)\n",
+       printf(" -I: specify interval in unit (default: %"PRIu64")\n",
               TEST_HOST_LOOP_INTERVAL);
+       printf(" -u: specify unit in ms (default: 1)\n");
        printf(" -p: specify guest physical test memory offset\n"
               "     Warning: a low offset can conflict with the loaded test code.\n");
        printf(" -M: specify the host logging mode "
@@ -832,6 +837,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
        struct test_params p = {
                .iterations = TEST_HOST_LOOP_N,
                .interval = TEST_HOST_LOOP_INTERVAL,
+               .unit = TEST_HOST_LOOP_UNIT,
        };
        int opt, i;

@@ -840,7 +846,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])

        guest_modes_append_default();

-       while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "c:hi:I:p:m:M:")) != -1) {
+       while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "c:hi:I:u:p:m:M:")) != -1) {
                switch (opt) {
                case 'c':
                        test_dirty_ring_count = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
@@ -851,6 +857,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
                case 'I':
                        p.interval = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
                        break;
+               case 'u':
+                       p.unit = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
+                       break;
                case 'p':
                        p.phys_offset = strtoull(optarg, NULL, 0);
                        break;
@@ -886,9 +895,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])

        TEST_ASSERT(p.iterations > 0, "Iterations must be greater than zero");
        TEST_ASSERT(p.interval > 0, "Interval must be greater than zero");
+       TEST_ASSERT(p.unit > 0, "Unit must be greater than zero");

-       pr_info("Test iterations: %"PRIu64", interval: %"PRIu64" (ms)\n",
-               p.iterations, p.interval);
+       pr_info("Test iterations: %"PRIu64", interval: %"PRIu64", unit: %"PRIu64" (ms)\n",
+               p.iterations, p.interval, p.unit);

        if (host_log_mode_option == LOG_MODE_ALL) {
                /* Run each log mode */
--
2.43.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] RISC-V: KVM: Fix skip of valid pages in kvm_riscv_gstage_wp_range
       [not found] <202605111849442561v1a0B_7W1L2Z-ENusLaP@zte.com.cn>
  2026-05-11 11:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: selftests: Add unit to dirty_log_test wu.fei9
@ 2026-05-11 11:24 ` wu.fei9
  2026-05-11 11:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] RISC-V: KVM: Fix skip of valid pages in kvm_riscv_gstage_unmap_range wu.fei9
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wu.fei9 @ 2026-05-11 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kselftest, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, kvm, kvm-riscv
  Cc: anup, atish.patra, pjw, palmer, aou, alex, pbonzini, shuah,
	wu.fei9

The current gstage range walker unconditionally advances by 'page_size'
when a leaf PTE is not found, e.g. when the range to wp is
[0xfffff01fc000, 0xfffff023c000) and page_size is 2MB, if found_leaf of
0xfffff01fc000 returns false, it skip the whole range, but it's possible
to have valid entries in [0xfffff0200000, 0xfffff023c000).

Signed-off-by: Wu Fei <wu.fei9@sanechips.com.cn>
---
 arch/riscv/kvm/gstage.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/gstage.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/gstage.c
index d9fe8be2a151..2b141a78ecac 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/gstage.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/gstage.c
@@ -429,14 +429,14 @@ void kvm_riscv_gstage_wp_range(struct kvm_gstage *gstage, gpa_t start, gpa_t end
                if (ret)
                        break;

-               if (!found_leaf)
-                       goto next;
-
-               addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, page_size);
-               kvm_riscv_gstage_op_pte(gstage, addr, ptep,
-                                       ptep_level, GSTAGE_OP_WP);
-next:
-               addr += page_size;
+               if (!found_leaf) {
+                       addr = ALIGN(addr + 1, page_size);
+               } else {
+                       addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, page_size);
+                       kvm_riscv_gstage_op_pte(gstage, addr, ptep,
+                                               ptep_level, GSTAGE_OP_WP);
+                       addr += page_size;
+               }
        }
 }

--
2.43.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] RISC-V: KVM: Fix skip of valid pages in kvm_riscv_gstage_unmap_range
       [not found] <202605111849442561v1a0B_7W1L2Z-ENusLaP@zte.com.cn>
  2026-05-11 11:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: selftests: Add unit to dirty_log_test wu.fei9
  2026-05-11 11:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] RISC-V: KVM: Fix skip of valid pages in kvm_riscv_gstage_wp_range wu.fei9
@ 2026-05-11 11:29 ` wu.fei9
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wu.fei9 @ 2026-05-11 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kselftest, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, kvm, kvm-riscv
  Cc: anup, atish.patra, pjw, palmer, aou, alex, pbonzini, shuah,
	wu.fei9

Same as kvm_riscv_gstage_wp_range, the possible valid pages should not
be skipped if !found_leaf. Different from wp case, which can
write-protect more than asked, unmap can't do that, no splitting is
added right now but a warning is logged instead.

Signed-off-by: Wu Fei <wu.fei9@sanechips.com.cn>
---
 arch/riscv/kvm/gstage.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/gstage.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/gstage.c
index 2b141a78ecac..d78f5aeb8b40 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/gstage.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/gstage.c
@@ -395,15 +395,19 @@ void kvm_riscv_gstage_unmap_range(struct kvm_gstage *gstage,
                if (ret)
                        break;

-               if (!found_leaf)
-                       goto next;
-
-               if (!(addr & (page_size - 1)) && ((end - addr) >= page_size))
-                       kvm_riscv_gstage_op_pte(gstage, addr, ptep,
-                                               ptep_level, GSTAGE_OP_CLEAR);
+               if (!found_leaf) {
+                       addr = ALIGN(addr + 1, page_size);
+               } else {
+                       if (!(addr & (page_size - 1)) && ((end - addr) >= page_size))
+                               kvm_riscv_gstage_op_pte(gstage, addr, ptep,
+                                                       ptep_level, GSTAGE_OP_CLEAR);
+                       else {
+                               WARN_ONCE(1, "Skip unmap range addr: %#llx, end: %#llx, page_size: %#lx\n",
+                                               addr, end, page_size);
+                       }

-next:
-               addr += page_size;
+                       addr += page_size;
+               }

                /*
                 * If the range is too large, release the kvm->mmu_lock
--
2.43.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-11 11:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <202605111849442561v1a0B_7W1L2Z-ENusLaP@zte.com.cn>
2026-05-11 11:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: selftests: Add unit to dirty_log_test wu.fei9
2026-05-11 11:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] RISC-V: KVM: Fix skip of valid pages in kvm_riscv_gstage_wp_range wu.fei9
2026-05-11 11:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] RISC-V: KVM: Fix skip of valid pages in kvm_riscv_gstage_unmap_range wu.fei9

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox