From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@nvidia.com>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vfio/pci: Latch all module parameters per device
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:06:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611130606.5d0a9f7a@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611184428.C16441F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org>
On Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:44:28 +0000
sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> New issues:
> - [High] VGA Arbiter NULL Pointer Dereference on Error Path
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Bitfield data race breaking device interrupts and Runtime PM
> --
>
> commit 26787ee0fbb65453cacc903b9b0170155208490a
> Author: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@nvidia.com>
>
> vfio/pci: Latch all module parameters per device
>
> The vfio-pci module parameters of disable_idle_d3, nointxmask, and
> disable_vga latch vfio-pci policy into vfio-pci-core globals each time
> the vfio-pci module is initialized. The disable_idle_d3 parameter has
> already migrated to a per-device flag in order to provide consistency
> for refcounted PM operations for the lifetime of the device registration.
>
> Pull the remaining vfio-pci module-parameter policy out of vfio-pci-core
> into per-device flags set at device initialization.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> > index 9f71eae0cc947..61cf1a1996b0d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -111,11 +107,12 @@ static inline bool vfio_vga_disabled(void)
> > */
> > static unsigned int vfio_pci_set_decode(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool single_vga)
> > {
> > + struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> > struct pci_dev *tmp = NULL;
> > unsigned char max_busnr;
> > unsigned int decodes;
> >
> > - if (single_vga || !vfio_vga_disabled() || pci_is_root_bus(pdev->bus))
> > + if (single_vga || !vfio_vga_disabled(vdev) || pci_is_root_bus(pdev->bus))
>
> [Severity: High]
> If vfio_pci_core_register_device() fails on vfio_register_group_dev(), the
> error path skips calling vfio_pci_vga_uninit():
>
> out_power:
> if (!vdev->disable_idle_d3)
> pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
>
> pm_runtime_forbid(dev);
> out_vf:
> vfio_pci_vf_uninit(vdev);
> return ret;
>
> This leaves the device registered with the VGA arbiter. After the probe fails,
> the driver core clears the drvdata.
>
> Will the VGA arbiter later invoke this callback, causing dev_get_drvdata() to
> return NULL and vfio_vga_disabled(vdev) to panic when dereferencing vdev?
Tricky, preexisting lack of unwind becomes a NULL deref with per device
flags. Will fix.
> > diff --git a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
> > index 27aab3fdbb91d..74b950d73aef0 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ struct vfio_pci_core_device {
> > bool pm_intx_masked:1;
> > bool pm_runtime_engaged:1;
> > bool disable_idle_d3:1;
> > + bool nointxmask:1;
> > + bool disable_vga:1;
> > bool sriov_active;
>
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but this patch extends the bitfield block that
> has a data race.
>
> vdev->pm_intx_masked and vdev->pm_runtime_engaged are adjacent bitfields.
>
> In vfio_pci_core_runtime_suspend(), pm_intx_masked is updated without holding
> vdev->memory_lock:
>
> vdev->pm_intx_masked = ((vdev->irq_type == VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX) &&
> vfio_pci_intx_mask(vdev));
>
> Concurrently, userspace can call __vfio_pci_runtime_pm_exit(), which takes
> vdev->memory_lock and updates pm_runtime_engaged:
>
> if (vdev->pm_runtime_engaged) {
> vdev->pm_runtime_engaged = false;
>
> Because these bitfields share the same memory byte and are updated without a
> shared lock, will the read-modify-write operations race and potentially lose
> one of the updates, permanently breaking device interrupts or low-power state
> entry?
>
Sigh, yes, I need to get back to this too. Thanks,
Alex
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 18:25 [PATCH 0/2] vfio/pci: Latch module parameters per device Alex Williamson
2026-06-11 18:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfio/pci: Latch disable_idle_d3 " Alex Williamson
2026-06-11 18:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfio/pci: Latch all module parameters " Alex Williamson
2026-06-11 18:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 19:06 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260611130606.5d0a9f7a@nvidia.com \
--to=alex.williamson@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox