From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@nvidia.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vfio/pci: Latch all module parameters per device
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:44:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611184428.C16441F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611182528.4004073-3-alex.williamson@nvidia.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] VGA Arbiter NULL Pointer Dereference on Error Path
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Bitfield data race breaking device interrupts and Runtime PM
--
commit 26787ee0fbb65453cacc903b9b0170155208490a
Author: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@nvidia.com>
vfio/pci: Latch all module parameters per device
The vfio-pci module parameters of disable_idle_d3, nointxmask, and
disable_vga latch vfio-pci policy into vfio-pci-core globals each time
the vfio-pci module is initialized. The disable_idle_d3 parameter has
already migrated to a per-device flag in order to provide consistency
for refcounted PM operations for the lifetime of the device registration.
Pull the remaining vfio-pci module-parameter policy out of vfio-pci-core
into per-device flags set at device initialization.
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> index 9f71eae0cc947..61cf1a1996b0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -111,11 +107,12 @@ static inline bool vfio_vga_disabled(void)
> */
> static unsigned int vfio_pci_set_decode(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool single_vga)
> {
> + struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> struct pci_dev *tmp = NULL;
> unsigned char max_busnr;
> unsigned int decodes;
>
> - if (single_vga || !vfio_vga_disabled() || pci_is_root_bus(pdev->bus))
> + if (single_vga || !vfio_vga_disabled(vdev) || pci_is_root_bus(pdev->bus))
[Severity: High]
If vfio_pci_core_register_device() fails on vfio_register_group_dev(), the
error path skips calling vfio_pci_vga_uninit():
out_power:
if (!vdev->disable_idle_d3)
pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
pm_runtime_forbid(dev);
out_vf:
vfio_pci_vf_uninit(vdev);
return ret;
This leaves the device registered with the VGA arbiter. After the probe fails,
the driver core clears the drvdata.
Will the VGA arbiter later invoke this callback, causing dev_get_drvdata() to
return NULL and vfio_vga_disabled(vdev) to panic when dereferencing vdev?
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
> index 27aab3fdbb91d..74b950d73aef0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ struct vfio_pci_core_device {
> bool pm_intx_masked:1;
> bool pm_runtime_engaged:1;
> bool disable_idle_d3:1;
> + bool nointxmask:1;
> + bool disable_vga:1;
> bool sriov_active;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but this patch extends the bitfield block that
has a data race.
vdev->pm_intx_masked and vdev->pm_runtime_engaged are adjacent bitfields.
In vfio_pci_core_runtime_suspend(), pm_intx_masked is updated without holding
vdev->memory_lock:
vdev->pm_intx_masked = ((vdev->irq_type == VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX) &&
vfio_pci_intx_mask(vdev));
Concurrently, userspace can call __vfio_pci_runtime_pm_exit(), which takes
vdev->memory_lock and updates pm_runtime_engaged:
if (vdev->pm_runtime_engaged) {
vdev->pm_runtime_engaged = false;
Because these bitfields share the same memory byte and are updated without a
shared lock, will the read-modify-write operations race and potentially lose
one of the updates, permanently breaking device interrupts or low-power state
entry?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260611182528.4004073-1-alex.williamson@nvidia.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 18:25 [PATCH 0/2] vfio/pci: Latch module parameters per device Alex Williamson
2026-06-11 18:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfio/pci: Latch disable_idle_d3 " Alex Williamson
2026-06-11 18:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfio/pci: Latch all module parameters " Alex Williamson
2026-06-11 18:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-11 19:06 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260611184428.C16441F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox