From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Richie Buturla <richie@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: Credit nominated next-buddy in yield_to_task_fair()
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 09:33:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612013355.59231-5-kernellwp@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612013355.59231-1-kernellwp@gmail.com>
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
After set_next_buddy() nominates the yield_to() target at every level of
its sched_entity hierarchy, walk that same hierarchy and credit bounded
EEVDF lag to each not-yet-eligible entity. This allows pick_eevdf()'s
PICK_BUDDY path to select the nominated target instead of dropping the
hint at the first ineligible group entity.
Gate the walk with YIELD_TO_LAG_CREDIT. With the feature disabled,
yield_to_task_fair() keeps the existing forfeit-based behavior.
yield_to() holds both rq locks via double_rq_lock(), so touching the
target task's cfs_rqs, including remote cfs_rqs, is safe. Stop the walk
where set_next_buddy() stopped, and skip delayed or throttled entities.
Refresh the target rq clock when it differs from the local rq so the
per-level update_curr() calls observe current rq_clock values. The local
rq still uses the existing yield_task_fair() path in this change.
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index c28682fedb36..48f65a4f1923 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9346,8 +9346,8 @@ static void put_prev_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct t
* depth so it stays eligible across several picks. The caller clamps it to
* entity_lag()'s legal bound, so EEVDF fairness is preserved.
*/
-static u64 __maybe_unused
-eevdf_persistent_margin(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
+static u64 eevdf_persistent_margin(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
+ struct sched_entity *se)
{
u64 base = sysctl_sched_base_slice;
unsigned int n = cfs_rq->h_nr_queued;
@@ -9379,7 +9379,7 @@ eevdf_persistent_margin(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
* Idempotent once @se holds the margin. Caller must hold
* rq_of(cfs_rq)->lock with rq_clock up to date.
*/
-static void __maybe_unused
+static void
eevdf_credit_entity_vlag(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
u64 avruntime, credit, want, margin, max_slice, lag_limit;
@@ -9488,6 +9488,7 @@ static void yield_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
static bool yield_to_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
+ struct rq *p_rq = task_rq(p);
/* !se->on_rq also covers throttled task */
if (!se->on_rq)
@@ -9496,6 +9497,43 @@ static bool yield_to_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
/* Tell the scheduler that we'd really like se to run next. */
set_next_buddy(se);
+ /* Without lag credit, keep the existing forfeit-based yield. */
+ if (!sched_feat(YIELD_TO_LAG_CREDIT)) {
+ yield_task_fair(rq);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Walk the ancestor chain set_next_buddy() just nominated and credit
+ * bounded lag to each not-yet-eligible level so pick_eevdf() returns
+ * it. yield_to() holds both rq locks via double_rq_lock(), so touching
+ * p's cfs_rqs (possibly on another CPU) is safe; the primitive is
+ * idempotent, so no rate limiting is needed.
+ *
+ * Only refresh p_rq's clock when it differs from the local rq. A
+ * remote p_rq must be refreshed so the per-level update_curr() is
+ * accurate. In the same-rq case we skip it: the credit is a
+ * best-effort hint and the rq clock is recent enough, while the
+ * trailing yield_task_fair() would otherwise make this a second
+ * update_rq_clock() on the same rq and trip
+ * SCHED_WARN_ON(WARN_DOUBLE_CLOCK).
+ */
+ if (rq != p_rq)
+ update_rq_clock(p_rq);
+
+ for_each_sched_entity(se) {
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+
+ if (cfs_rq->next != se)
+ break;
+ if (se->sched_delayed)
+ break;
+ if (throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
+ break;
+
+ eevdf_credit_entity_vlag(cfs_rq, se);
+ }
+
yield_task_fair(rq);
return true;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 1:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 1:33 [PATCH v3 00/10] sched/fair, KVM: Semantics-aware directed yield for oversubscribed KVM Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] sched/fair: Add EEVDF lag credit primitive for nominated next-buddy Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12 1:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 5:34 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-12 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] sched/fair: Credit a persistent, queue-depth-scaled vlag margin Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12 1:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 6:07 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-12 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] sched/fair: Credit queued next-buddy via canonical requeue Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12 1:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 1:33 ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2026-06-12 1:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: Credit nominated next-buddy in yield_to_task_fair() sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] sched/fair: Force a local resched on yield_to() so the buddy is picked Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12 1:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] KVM: x86: Add IPI tracking infrastructure for directed yield Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] KVM: x86/lapic: Track unicast fixed IPI delivery Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] KVM: x86/lapic: Clear IPI tracking on matching-vector EOI Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12 3:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] KVM: Add IPI-aware directed-yield candidate selection Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12 1:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] KVM: Add relaxed preempted-only fallback for directed yield Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12 5:17 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] sched/fair, KVM: Semantics-aware directed yield for oversubscribed KVM K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-12 9:43 ` Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260612013355.59231-5-kernellwp@gmail.com \
--to=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richie@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox