Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Wanpeng Li" <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] KVM: x86/lapic: Clear IPI tracking on matching-vector EOI
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 03:46:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612034633.023F11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612013355.59231-9-kernellwp@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The EOI handler incorrectly clears the vCPU's outgoing IPI tracking state when acknowledging an incoming IPI due to conflated incoming and outgoing tracking fields.
--

commit f711eb495ad18e2339b40d0c737023fdb3459a71
Author: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>

KVM: x86/lapic: Clear IPI tracking on matching-vector EOI

This commit updates apic_set_eoi() and kvm_apic_set_eoi_accelerated() to
clear IPI tracking state only when the EOI vector matches the tracked
vector, aiming to prevent eviction of pending contexts when unrelated
interrupts are handled.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
[ ... ]
> +static void kvm_clear_ipi_on_eoi(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int vector)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *receiver = apic->vcpu;
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *sender;
> +	int sender_idx;
> +	u64 then, now;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!READ_ONCE(ipi_tracking_enabled)))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (vector < 0 || vector > 0xff)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (READ_ONCE(receiver->arch.ipi_context.vector) != (u8)vector)
> +		return;
> +
> +	sender_idx = READ_ONCE(receiver->arch.ipi_context.last_ipi_sender);
> +	kvm_vcpu_clear_ipi_context(receiver);

[Severity: Medium]
Does calling kvm_vcpu_clear_ipi_context() here unintentionally clear the
vCPU's outgoing IPI tracking state?

Looking at kvm_vcpu_clear_ipi_context(), it clears the entire ipi_context
structure, including pending_ipi and last_ipi_receiver. Since a vCPU can
act as both a sender and a receiver concurrently, acknowledging an incoming
IPI here appears to erase the vCPU's state as a sender.

Could this destroy the directed yield hint and cause concurrent IPI sender
and receiver vCPUs to miss the yield optimization?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612013355.59231-1-kernellwp@gmail.com?part=8

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-12  3:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-12  1:33 [PATCH v3 00/10] sched/fair, KVM: Semantics-aware directed yield for oversubscribed KVM Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] sched/fair: Add EEVDF lag credit primitive for nominated next-buddy Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12  1:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12  5:34   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-12  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] sched/fair: Credit a persistent, queue-depth-scaled vlag margin Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12  1:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12  6:07   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-12  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] sched/fair: Credit queued next-buddy via canonical requeue Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12  1:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: Credit nominated next-buddy in yield_to_task_fair() Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12  1:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] sched/fair: Force a local resched on yield_to() so the buddy is picked Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12  1:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] KVM: x86: Add IPI tracking infrastructure for directed yield Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] KVM: x86/lapic: Track unicast fixed IPI delivery Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] KVM: x86/lapic: Clear IPI tracking on matching-vector EOI Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12  3:46   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-12  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] KVM: Add IPI-aware directed-yield candidate selection Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12  1:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12  1:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] KVM: Add relaxed preempted-only fallback for directed yield Wanpeng Li
2026-06-12  5:17 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] sched/fair, KVM: Semantics-aware directed yield for oversubscribed KVM K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-12  9:43 ` Shrikanth Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260612034633.023F11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox