From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: SVM: Remove VM from the GA Log notifier list before VM destruction
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 21:15:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630211556.05EA91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630210156.457151-4-seanjc@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The patch fails to fully resolve the Use-After-Free race in `avic_ga_log_notifier()`. It leaves a Time-Of-Check to Time-Of-Use (TOCTOU) vulnerability where an already-found vCPU pointer can be dereferenced after it is freed.
--
commit a94e2dbde8bab766023c731fa2628928c6d8e750
Author: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
KVM: SVM: Remove VM from the GA Log notifier list before VM destruction
This patch changes when a VM is deleted from the GA Log interrupt list. It
now removes the VM during avic_vm_pre_destroy() instead of waiting for
avic_vm_destroy(). This attempts to prevent a use-after-free if a GA Log
notification arrives for a vCPU after the last reference to the VM is put.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
> index d71a2fed1a08b..c5b1d294b15a2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
> @@ -374,9 +374,20 @@ int avic_vcpu_precreate(struct kvm *kvm)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +void avic_vm_pre_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + struct kvm_svm *kvm_svm = to_kvm_svm(kvm);
> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!enable_apicv) || !kvm_svm->avic_vm_id)
> + return;
> +
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&svm_vm_data_hash_lock);
> +
> + hash_del(&kvm_svm->hnode);
> +}
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could there still be a
Time-Of-Check to Time-Of-Use race in avic_ga_log_notifier()?
If a notification arrives and avic_ga_log_notifier() finds the VM and its
vCPU pointer under svm_vm_data_hash_lock, it drops the lock before calling
kvm_vcpu_wake_up():
arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c:avic_ga_log_notifier() {
...
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&svm_vm_data_hash_lock, flags);
if (vcpu)
kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
}
If avic_ga_log_notifier() is preempted right after releasing the lock,
couldn't avic_vm_pre_destroy() still run concurrently, remove the VM from
the hash table here, and allow the remaining teardown process to free the
vCPUs?
Would this result in avic_ga_log_notifier() calling kvm_vcpu_wake_up()
on a freed vCPU pointer once it resumes execution?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260630210156.457151-1-seanjc@google.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 21:01 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: SVM: Fix a (very) unlikely UAF for GA Log IRQs Sean Christopherson
2026-06-30 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: SVM: Make kvm_x86_ops.vcpu_precreate() hook fully AVIC specific Sean Christopherson
2026-06-30 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: SVM: Do all per-VM AVIC initialization during vCPU precreation phase Sean Christopherson
2026-06-30 21:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 21:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-06-30 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: SVM: Remove VM from the GA Log notifier list before VM destruction Sean Christopherson
2026-06-30 21:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-30 21:27 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260630211556.05EA91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox