Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: Randomize pCPU in steal time test
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 15:29:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707152943.290581F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707150706.1198541-3-seanjc@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Uninitialized variable read leading to test flakes if pthread_getaffinity_np() fails.
--

--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: Randomize pCPU in steal time test ---
commit 0d5df2335fea13e6ab9b9a76b38f38b87bb2fb85
Author: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
KVM: selftests: Randomize pCPU in steal time test

This commit updates the steal time test to pin its tasks to a random pCPU
instead of hardcoding pCPU0. It aims to increase test coverage and properly
handle parent tasks that lack pCPU0 in their CPU affinity mask.

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -514,14 +514,12 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>  	long stolen_time;
>  	long run_delay;
>  	bool verbose;
> -	int i;
> +	int i, cpu;
>  
>  	verbose = ac > 1 && (!strncmp(av[1], "-v", 3) || !strncmp(av[1], "--verbose", 10));
>  
>  	/* Set CPU affinity so we can force preemption of the VCPU */
> -	CPU_ZERO(&cpuset);
> -	CPU_SET(0, &cpuset);
> -	pthread_setaffinity_np(pthread_self(), sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpuset);
> +	cpu = pin_self_to_any_cpu();
>  
>  	/* Create a VM and an identity mapped memslot for the steal time structure */
>  	vm = vm_create_with_vcpus(NR_VCPUS, guest_code, vcpus);
[ ... ]
> @@ -557,7 +555,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>  		run_delay = get_run_delay();
>  		pthread_create(&thread, NULL, do_steal_time, NULL);
>  		pthread_getaffinity_np(thread, sizeof(cpuset), &cpuset);
> -		TEST_ASSERT(CPU_COUNT(&cpuset) == 1 && CPU_ISSET(0, &cpuset),
> +		TEST_ASSERT(CPU_COUNT(&cpuset) == 1 && CPU_ISSET(cpu, &cpuset),

[Severity: Medium]
Is there a race condition here if the worker thread exits before the parent
reads its affinity?

When pthread_create() spawns the worker thread, the child runs for a short
duration and exits. If the parent thread is preempted right after creation,
the child might finish its work and exit before pthread_getaffinity_np()
executes in the parent.

If the kernel task is already gone, pthread_getaffinity_np() will fail with
ESRCH. Because the explicit initialization of cpuset was removed earlier in
main(), cpuset remains completely uninitialized.

Could this cause CPU_COUNT() and CPU_ISSET() to evaluate garbage stack memory
and trigger sporadic TEST_ASSERT failures? Should the return value of
pthread_getaffinity_np() be checked, or should cpuset be initialized before
the call?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260707150706.1198541-1-seanjc@google.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-07 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-07 15:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftest: Fix steal time w/ non-glibc builds Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: selftests: Drop superfluous use of pthread_attr_setaffinity_np() Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 15:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 16:03     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: Randomize pCPU in steal time test Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 15:29   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-07 16:15     ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260707152943.290581F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox