From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: Randomize pCPU in steal time test
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 09:15:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ak0mJLxaz2TBwM0p@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707152943.290581F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2026, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -514,14 +514,12 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
> > long stolen_time;
> > long run_delay;
> > bool verbose;
> > - int i;
> > + int i, cpu;
> >
> > verbose = ac > 1 && (!strncmp(av[1], "-v", 3) || !strncmp(av[1], "--verbose", 10));
> >
> > /* Set CPU affinity so we can force preemption of the VCPU */
> > - CPU_ZERO(&cpuset);
> > - CPU_SET(0, &cpuset);
> > - pthread_setaffinity_np(pthread_self(), sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpuset);
> > + cpu = pin_self_to_any_cpu();
> >
> > /* Create a VM and an identity mapped memslot for the steal time structure */
> > vm = vm_create_with_vcpus(NR_VCPUS, guest_code, vcpus);
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -557,7 +555,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
> > run_delay = get_run_delay();
> > pthread_create(&thread, NULL, do_steal_time, NULL);
> > pthread_getaffinity_np(thread, sizeof(cpuset), &cpuset);
> > - TEST_ASSERT(CPU_COUNT(&cpuset) == 1 && CPU_ISSET(0, &cpuset),
> > + TEST_ASSERT(CPU_COUNT(&cpuset) == 1 && CPU_ISSET(cpu, &cpuset),
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Is there a race condition here if the worker thread exits before the parent
> reads its affinity?
>
> When pthread_create() spawns the worker thread, the child runs for a short
> duration and exits. If the parent thread is preempted right after creation,
> the child might finish its work and exit before pthread_getaffinity_np()
> executes in the parent.
>
> If the kernel task is already gone, pthread_getaffinity_np() will fail with
No, because the kernel task is kept alive until pthread_join(). As per the
pthread_create() manpage[*]:
Only when a terminated joinable thread has been joined are the last of its
resources released back to the system.
And by empirical testing, that includes the kernel task.
[*] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/pthread_create.3.html
> ESRCH. Because the explicit initialization of cpuset was removed earlier in
> main(), cpuset remains completely uninitialized.
>
> Could this cause CPU_COUNT() and CPU_ISSET() to evaluate garbage stack memory
> and trigger sporadic TEST_ASSERT failures? Should the return value of
> pthread_getaffinity_np() be checked, or should cpuset be initialized before
> the call?
The return value should be checked, but I'd rather handle that in a separate
cleanup by adding a wrapper in kvm_syscalls.h.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 15:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: selftest: Fix steal time w/ non-glibc builds Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: selftests: Drop superfluous use of pthread_attr_setaffinity_np() Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 15:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 16:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: Randomize pCPU in steal time test Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 15:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 16:15 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ak0mJLxaz2TBwM0p@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox