From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tarun Sahu" <tarunsahu@google.com>
Cc: "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/11] KVM: guest_memfd: Add support for freezing mappings
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:20:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728122026.E3E831F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728121138.1103610-8-tarunsahu@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Holding the global `kvm_gmem_freeze_srcu` read lock during unbounded `fallocate` operations allows an unprivileged tenant to block `kvm_gmem_freeze()` indefinitely for other VMs.
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v4 07/11] KVM: guest_memfd: Add support for freezing mappings ---
commit de8f141a41c06197ca510e03554977beeeb4fcdf
Author: Tarun Sahu <tarunsahu@google.com>
KVM: guest_memfd: Add support for freezing mappings
This commit introduces kvm_gmem_freeze() to freeze a guest_memfd inode's
mapping to prevent fallocate and page fault allocations during preservation.
It uses a global SRCU to synchronize freeze state checkers without incurring
per-fault locking overhead or per-CPU memory exhaustion.
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> index fe1adc9ba48d1..a4d9d348e4d16 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -273,16 +284,30 @@ static long kvm_gmem_allocate(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> static long kvm_gmem_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset,
> loff_t len)
> {
> + struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> int ret;
> + int idx;
>
> - if (!(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE))
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm_gmem_freeze_srcu);
> + if (kvm_gmem_is_frozen(inode)) {
> + srcu_read_unlock(&kvm_gmem_freeze_srcu, idx);
> + return -EPERM;
> + }
[ ... ]
> if (mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)
> ret = kvm_gmem_punch_hole(file_inode(file), offset, len);
> else
> ret = kvm_gmem_allocate(file_inode(file), offset, len);
>
> if (!ret)
> file_modified(file);
> +
> +out:
> + srcu_read_unlock(&kvm_gmem_freeze_srcu, idx);
> return ret;
> }
[Severity: High]
Does this code allow an unprivileged tenant to stall the system by holding the
global kvm_gmem_freeze_srcu read lock across unbounded fallocate operations?
If a tenant requests a massive hole punch or allocation, kvm_gmem_fallocate()
holds the read lock for the entire duration of kvm_gmem_punch_hole() or
kvm_gmem_allocate().
If another VM triggers kvm_gmem_freeze(..., true) during this time, it will
block in synchronize_srcu(&kvm_gmem_freeze_srcu) until the massive operation
completes.
Could this lead to a cross-tenant denial of service where one VM blocks live
updates and preservation operations for all other VMs on the same hypervisor?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728121138.1103610-1-tarunsahu@google.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 12:11 [PATCH v4 00/11] liveupdate: kvm: Guest_memfd preservation Tarun Sahu
2026-07-28 12:11 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] liveupdate: Add LIVEUPDATE_GUEST_MEMFD config option Tarun Sahu
2026-07-28 12:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 12:11 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] KVM: Introduce kvm_create_vm_file() helper Tarun Sahu
2026-07-28 12:11 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] KVM: Export kvm_uevent_notify_vm_create() Tarun Sahu
2026-07-28 12:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 12:11 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] KVM: Track weak reference to vm_file in struct kvm Tarun Sahu
2026-07-28 12:11 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] KVM: LUO: Support VM preservation across live updates Tarun Sahu
2026-07-28 12:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 12:11 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] KVM: guest_memfd: Move internal definitions to internal header Tarun Sahu
2026-07-28 12:11 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] KVM: guest_memfd: Add support for freezing mappings Tarun Sahu
2026-07-28 12:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-28 12:11 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] KVM: guest_memfd: Add support for preservation via LUO Tarun Sahu
2026-07-28 12:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 12:11 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] docs: liveupdate: Add documentation for VM and guest_memfd preservation Tarun Sahu
2026-07-28 12:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 12:11 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] KVM: selftests: Split ____vm_create() and add vm_create_from_fd() Tarun Sahu
2026-07-28 12:11 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] KVM: selftests: Add guest_memfd_preservation_test Tarun Sahu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728122026.E3E831F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tarunsahu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox