Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 18/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX sub-features to userspace
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 20:01:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260729200135.8F3281F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729191656.598771-19-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] KVM fails to mask host CPUID leaf 0x29 with its virtualization capabilities, unconditionally exposing future host hardware features to userspace.
--

--- Patch [18]: [PATCH v6 18/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX sub-features to userspace ---
commit 858481784d49e0b77ae999aa39a6b6f4ada7e521
Author: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Subject: KVM: x86: Expose APX sub-features to userspace

This commit adds CPUID leaf 0x29 sub-leaf 0 to expose APX sub-features
(NCI, NDD, NF) to userspace if the APX foundation is available.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -1719,7 +1723,8 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array, u32 function)
>  	}
>  	/* APX sub-features */
>  	case 0x29:
> -		entry->eax = entry->ebx = entry->ecx = entry->edx = 0;
> +		if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_APX))
> +			entry->eax = entry->ebx = entry->ecx = entry->edx = 0;

[Severity: High]
If the host supports X86_FEATURE_APX, does __do_cpuid_func() bypass masking
the KVM CPU capabilities for leaf 0x29?

When kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_APX) is true, this path breaks out without
applying cpuid_entry_override(entry, CPUID_29_0_EBX) or clearing the unused
registers (eax, ecx, edx).

Could this leak unmasked host CPUID values for leaf 0x29 directly to
userspace when KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID is called? Exposing unvetted
hardware features might break guest live migration to older hosts.

>  		break;
>  	case KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE: {
>  		const u32 *sigptr = (const u32 *)KVM_SIGNATURE;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260729191656.598771-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com?part=18

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-29 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-29 19:16 [PATCH v6 00/20] KVM: x86: Enable APX for guests Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 01/20] KVM: x86: Extend VCPU registers for EGPRs Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 02/20] KVM: VMX: Save guest EGPRs in VCPU cache Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 03/20] KVM: x86: Support APX state for XSAVE ABI Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 04/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor VMX instruction information access Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 05/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor instruction information decoding Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 06/20] KVM: VMX: Remove unused control-register access defines Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 07/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor register index retrieval from exit qualification Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 08/20] KVM: VMX: Support instruction information extension Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 09/20] KVM: nVMX: Propagate extended instruction information Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 10/20] KVM: x86: Support EGPR accessing and tracking for emulator Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 11/20] KVM: x86: Handle EGPR index and REX2-incompatible opcodes Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 12/20] KVM: x86: Support REX2-prefixed opcode decode Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 13/20] KVM: x86: Reject EVEX-prefixed instructions Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 14/20] KVM: x86: Move KVM_SUPPORTED_{XCR0,XSS} into kvm_x86_vendor_init() Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 15/20] KVM: x86: Guard valid XCR0.APX settings Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 16/20] KVM: x86: Add APX to supported XCR0 Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 17/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX foundation feature to userspace Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 18/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX sub-features " Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:01   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 19/20] KVM: x86: selftests: Add APX state and ABI test Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 20/20] KVM: x86: selftests: Add APX state handling and XCR0 sanity checks Chang S. Bae

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260729200135.8F3281F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox