Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/20] KVM: VMX: Save guest EGPRs in VCPU cache
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 20:05:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260729200543.5868C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729191656.598771-3-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Live migration of APX-enabled guests results in silent guest state corruption (loss of EGPRs) due to a conflict between manual VCPU register caching and XSAVE state management.
--

--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v6 02/20] KVM: VMX: Save guest EGPRs in VCPU cache ---
commit 8d65deb78b6fe07e8687f8aa1c29bd4e028cfac7
Author: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>

KVM: VMX: Save guest EGPRs in VCPU cache
    
This patch saves and restores the guest EGPRs on VM exit/entry if the system
supports Advanced Performance Extensions (APX). It saves the EGPR state into
vcpu->arch.regs and clears the hardware registers on exit.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/adPRA4ZhnvbaXSn0@google.com

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
> index 00d807505fc88..702d86ade6b1d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S

[ ... ]

> @@ -193,8 +204,24 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL_ALIGN(vmx_vmexit, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
>  	mov %_ASM_BX, %_ASM_AX
>  
>  	/* Pop our saved arguments from the stack */
> -	pop %_ASM_BX
> -	pop %_ASM_BX
> +	pop %_ASM_BX	/* @flags */
> +	pop %_ASM_DI	/* @vmx */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_APX
> +	ALTERNATIVE "jmp .Lclear_egprs_done", "", X86_FEATURE_APX
> +	test	$KVM_ENTER_EGPR_SWITCH, %_ASM_BX
> +	jz	.Lclear_egprs_done
> +	/*
> +	 * Unlike legacy GPRs, saving could be conditional here on VM-Fail,
> +	 * which however isn't in fastpath. Instead, simply saving EGPRs always.
> +	 */
> +	STORE_REGS %_ASM_DI, VMX_vcpu_arch_regs, \
> +		   %r16, %r17, %r18, %r19, %r20, %r21, %r22, %r23, \
> +		   %r24, %r25, %r26, %r27, %r28, %r29, %r30, %r31
> +	CLEAR_REGS %r16d, %r17d, %r18d, %r19d, %r20d, %r21d, %r22d, %r23d, \
> +		   %r24d, %r25d, %r26d, %r27d, %r28d, %r29d, %r30d, %r31d

[Severity: High]
Does clearing the hardware EGPRs here cause state loss during live migration?

When KVM later unloads the vCPU and calls kvm_put_guest_fpu(), it uses the
hardware XSAVES instruction to capture the guest's FPU/extended state into
vcpu->arch.guest_fpu. Because the hardware EGPRs were zeroed here, XSAVES
populates the APX component of the XSAVE buffer with zeros.

When userspace subsequently calls KVM_GET_XSAVE2 to serialize the state for
migration, it exports the zeroed guest_fpu without synchronizing the true
register values from vcpu->arch.regs.

Additionally, userspace cannot fallback to KVM_GET_REGS because the UAPI
struct kvm_regs hasn't been updated to include R16-R31.

Could this lead to APX-enabled guests resuming with zeroed EGPRs after a
migration?

> +.Lclear_egprs_done:
> +#endif
>  
>  	/* ... and then the callee-save registers */
>  	pop %_ASM_BX

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260729191656.598771-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-29 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-29 19:16 [PATCH v6 00/20] KVM: x86: Enable APX for guests Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 01/20] KVM: x86: Extend VCPU registers for EGPRs Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 02/20] KVM: VMX: Save guest EGPRs in VCPU cache Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:05   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 03/20] KVM: x86: Support APX state for XSAVE ABI Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 04/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor VMX instruction information access Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 05/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor instruction information decoding Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 06/20] KVM: VMX: Remove unused control-register access defines Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 07/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor register index retrieval from exit qualification Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 08/20] KVM: VMX: Support instruction information extension Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 09/20] KVM: nVMX: Propagate extended instruction information Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 10/20] KVM: x86: Support EGPR accessing and tracking for emulator Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 11/20] KVM: x86: Handle EGPR index and REX2-incompatible opcodes Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 12/20] KVM: x86: Support REX2-prefixed opcode decode Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 13/20] KVM: x86: Reject EVEX-prefixed instructions Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 14/20] KVM: x86: Move KVM_SUPPORTED_{XCR0,XSS} into kvm_x86_vendor_init() Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 15/20] KVM: x86: Guard valid XCR0.APX settings Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 16/20] KVM: x86: Add APX to supported XCR0 Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 17/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX foundation feature to userspace Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 18/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX sub-features " Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 19/20] KVM: x86: selftests: Add APX state and ABI test Chang S. Bae
2026-07-29 20:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 19:16 ` [PATCH v6 20/20] KVM: x86: selftests: Add APX state handling and XCR0 sanity checks Chang S. Bae

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260729200543.5868C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox