kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@kernel.org,
	seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com,
	schlameuss@linux.ibm.com, gra@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v1 08/11] KVM: s390: Fix IRQ injection with SIGP Stop and Store Status
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:56:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260811155641.219777-9-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260811155641.219777-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

When __inject_sigp_stop() is called for a Stop and Store Status
operation, if the vCPU is running, the interrupt is marked as pending
and the status is stored by the thread performing the KVM_RUN IOCTL.

If the vCPU is already stopped, the status is stored immediately.

Storing the status means writing into userspace, which might fault, and
__inject_sigp_stop() is called from do_inject_vcpu() which in turn is
always called holding a spinlock, which is obviously an issue.

Fix this by returning -EWOULDBLOCK from __inject_sigp_stop(), and
adding a bool flag to indicate whether a store status is needed. The
callers of do_inject_vcpu() are modified to pass the pointer to the
bool flag; whenever a Store Status operation is needed, the callers can
now perform it outside the spinlock.

Opportunistically refactor kvm_s390_set_irq_state() to use
scoped_guard() and __free().

Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index 400ce7195b87..d38b9da0d09e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -1550,23 +1550,21 @@ static int __inject_set_prefix(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_s390_irq *irq)
 }
 
 #define KVM_S390_STOP_SUPP_FLAGS (KVM_S390_STOP_FLAG_STORE_STATUS)
-static int __inject_sigp_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_s390_irq *irq)
+static int __inject_sigp_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_s390_irq *irq, bool *storestatus)
 {
 	struct kvm_s390_local_interrupt *li = &vcpu->arch.local_int;
 	struct kvm_s390_stop_info *stop = &li->irq.stop;
-	int rc = 0;
 
 	vcpu->stat.inject_stop_signal++;
 	trace_kvm_s390_inject_vcpu(vcpu->vcpu_id, KVM_S390_SIGP_STOP, 0, 0);
 
 	if (irq->u.stop.flags & ~KVM_S390_STOP_SUPP_FLAGS)
 		return -EINVAL;
-
 	if (is_vcpu_stopped(vcpu)) {
-		if (irq->u.stop.flags & KVM_S390_STOP_FLAG_STORE_STATUS)
-			rc = kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded(vcpu,
-						KVM_S390_STORE_STATUS_NOADDR);
-		return rc;
+		if (!(irq->u.stop.flags & KVM_S390_STOP_FLAG_STORE_STATUS))
+			return 0;
+		*storestatus = true;
+		return -EWOULDBLOCK;
 	}
 
 	if (test_and_set_bit(IRQ_PEND_SIGP_STOP, &li->pending_irqs))
@@ -2102,7 +2100,7 @@ void kvm_s390_clear_stop_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	spin_unlock(&li->lock);
 }
 
-static int do_inject_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_s390_irq *irq)
+static int do_inject_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_s390_irq *irq, bool *storestatus)
 {
 	int rc;
 
@@ -2114,7 +2112,7 @@ static int do_inject_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_s390_irq *irq)
 		rc = __inject_set_prefix(vcpu, irq);
 		break;
 	case KVM_S390_SIGP_STOP:
-		rc = __inject_sigp_stop(vcpu, irq);
+		rc = __inject_sigp_stop(vcpu, irq, storestatus);
 		break;
 	case KVM_S390_RESTART:
 		rc = __inject_sigp_restart(vcpu);
@@ -2150,11 +2148,16 @@ static int do_inject_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_s390_irq *irq)
 int kvm_s390_inject_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_s390_irq *irq)
 {
 	struct kvm_s390_local_interrupt *li = &vcpu->arch.local_int;
+	bool storestatus = false;
 	int rc;
 
 	spin_lock(&li->lock);
-	rc = do_inject_vcpu(vcpu, irq);
+	rc = do_inject_vcpu(vcpu, irq, &storestatus);
 	spin_unlock(&li->lock);
+
+	if (rc == -EWOULDBLOCK && storestatus)
+		rc = kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded(vcpu, KVM_S390_STORE_STATUS_NOADDR);
+
 	if (!rc)
 		kvm_s390_vcpu_wakeup(vcpu);
 	return rc;
@@ -3178,7 +3181,8 @@ int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, struct kvm *kvm,
 int kvm_s390_set_irq_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __user *irqstate, int len)
 {
 	struct kvm_s390_local_interrupt *li = &vcpu->arch.local_int;
-	struct kvm_s390_irq *buf;
+	struct kvm_s390_irq *buf __free(kvfree) = NULL;
+	bool tmp, storestatus = false;
 	int r = 0;
 	int n;
 
@@ -3186,31 +3190,31 @@ int kvm_s390_set_irq_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __user *irqstate, int len
 	if (!buf)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	if (copy_from_user((void *) buf, irqstate, len)) {
-		r = -EFAULT;
-		goto out_free;
-	}
+	if (copy_from_user((void *)buf, irqstate, len))
+		return -EFAULT;
 
-	/*
-	 * Don't allow setting the interrupt state
-	 * when there are already interrupts pending
-	 */
-	spin_lock(&li->lock);
-	if (li->pending_irqs) {
-		r = -EBUSY;
-		goto out_unlock;
-	}
+	scoped_guard(spinlock, &li->lock) {
+		/*
+		 * Don't allow setting the interrupt state
+		 * when there are already interrupts pending
+		 */
+		if (li->pending_irqs)
+			return -EBUSY;
 
-	for (n = 0; n < len / sizeof(*buf); n++) {
-		r = do_inject_vcpu(vcpu, &buf[n]);
-		if (r)
-			break;
+		for (n = 0; n < len / sizeof(*buf); n++) {
+			tmp = false;
+			r = do_inject_vcpu(vcpu, &buf[n], &tmp);
+			if (r == -EWOULDBLOCK && tmp) {
+				storestatus = true;
+				continue;
+			}
+			if (r)
+				break;
+		}
 	}
 
-out_unlock:
-	spin_unlock(&li->lock);
-out_free:
-	vfree(buf);
+	if (storestatus)
+		r = kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded(vcpu, KVM_S390_STORE_STATUS_NOADDR);
 
 	return r;
 }
-- 
2.55.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-11 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-11 15:56 [PATCH v1 00/11] KVM: s390: And then... even more fixes again Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] KVM: s390: Properly handle NULL pointer in dat_cond_set_storage_key() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12  7:02   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-12  8:06   ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] KVM: s390: Use srcu in kvm_arch_vcpu_unlocked_ioctl() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 17:26   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-11 18:01     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] KVM: s390: Fix get_all_floating_irqs() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12  7:11   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-12  9:12     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] KVM: s390: Fix dirty marking in adapter_indicators_set*() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] KVM: s390: Fix pgste_get_trylock_multiple() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 17:07   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] KVM: s390: Introduce extended topup for struct kvm_s390_mmu_cache Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] KVM: s390: Move all code into kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12  8:39   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-11 15:56 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] KVM: s390: Fix kvm_s390_clear_pv_state() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12  7:22   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-12  8:07   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] KVM: s390: Fix potential tiny kernel stack leak Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 17:03   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] KVM: s390: Fix _gaccess_shadow_fault() Claudio Imbrenda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260811155641.219777-9-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).