From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@kernel.org, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
nrb@linux.ibm.com, schlameuss@linux.ibm.com, gra@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/11] KVM: s390: Fix get_all_floating_irqs()
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 09:11:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6cc80fa3-f506-4fff-970a-2cbd66d9ce49@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260811155641.219777-4-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Am 11.08.26 um 17:56 schrieb Claudio Imbrenda:
> When attempting to report all pending floating interrupt to userspace,
> the GISA IPM bits are atomically tested and cleared, and the
> corresponding interrupt description is written in the output buffer. If
> the output buffer is too small, an error is returned to userspace, but
> the GISA IPM bits are now lost.
>
> Fix by moving the GISA test at the end of the function, and keeping
> track of which bits have been cleared. In case of error, set the bits
> again, so they are not lost.
>
> Fixes: 24160af6cb28 ("KVM: s390: add GISA interrupts to FLIC ioctl interface")
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
this looks too complicated for a fix. Now what is the semantic of this?
This is used for migration purposes, and the doc says:
Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/s390_flic.rst
KVM_DEV_FLIC_GET_ALL_IRQS
Copies all floating interrupts into a buffer provided by userspace.
[...]
All interrupts remain pending, i.e. are not deleted from the list of
currently pending interrupts.
[...]
So even the success case is wrong. Why not simply add a new helper that
reads the GISA without clearing the bits?
static inline int gisa_test_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc)
{
return test_bit_inv(IPM_BIT_OFFSET + gisc, (unsigned long *) gisa);
}
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> index 6b3f97a7513b..30963e05e0e6 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> @@ -2211,15 +2211,14 @@ void kvm_s390_clear_float_irqs(struct kvm *kvm)
> static int get_all_floating_irqs(struct kvm *kvm, u8 __user *usrbuf, u64 len)
> {
> struct kvm_s390_gisa_interrupt *gi = &kvm->arch.gisa_int;
> + struct kvm_s390_irq *buf __free(kvfree) = NULL;
> struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info *inti;
> struct kvm_s390_float_interrupt *fi;
> - struct kvm_s390_irq *buf;
> struct kvm_s390_irq *irq;
> + unsigned int tmp = 0;
> int max_irqs;
> - int ret = 0;
> int n = 0;
> int i;
> - unsigned long flags;
>
> if (len > KVM_S390_FLIC_MAX_BUFFER || len == 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -2235,14 +2234,48 @@ static int get_all_floating_irqs(struct kvm *kvm, u8 __user *usrbuf, u64 len)
>
> max_irqs = len / sizeof(struct kvm_s390_irq);
>
> + fi = &kvm->arch.float_int;
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &fi->lock) {
> + for (i = 0; i < FIRQ_LIST_COUNT; i++) {
> + list_for_each_entry(inti, &fi->lists[i], list) {
> + /* signal userspace to try again */
> + if (n == max_irqs)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + inti_to_irq(inti, &buf[n]);
> + n++;
> + }
> + }
> + if (test_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->pending_irqs) ||
> + test_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE_EV, &fi->pending_irqs)) {
> + /* signal userspace to try again */
> + if (n == max_irqs)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + irq = (struct kvm_s390_irq *)&buf[n];
> + irq->type = KVM_S390_INT_SERVICE;
> + irq->u.ext = fi->srv_signal;
> + n++;
> + }
> + if (test_bit(IRQ_PEND_MCHK_REP, &fi->pending_irqs)) {
> + /* signal userspace to try again */
> + if (n == max_irqs)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + irq = (struct kvm_s390_irq *)&buf[n];
> + irq->type = KVM_S390_MCHK;
> + irq->u.mchk = fi->mchk;
> + n++;
> + }
> + }
> if (gi->origin && gisa_get_ipm(gi->origin)) {
> for (i = 0; i <= MAX_ISC; i++) {
> if (n == max_irqs) {
> + /* restore removed bits if returning failure */
> + __atomic_or(tmp, (void *)&gi->origin->ipm);
> /* signal userspace to try again */
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto out_nolock;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> }
> if (gisa_tac_ipm_gisc(gi->origin, i)) {
> + /* set aside the bits we cleared */
> + tmp |= 1 << (31 - i);
> irq = (struct kvm_s390_irq *) &buf[n];
> irq->type = KVM_S390_INT_IO(1, 0, 0, 0);
> irq->u.io.io_int_word = isc_to_int_word(i);
> @@ -2250,53 +2283,15 @@ static int get_all_floating_irqs(struct kvm *kvm, u8 __user *usrbuf, u64 len)
> }
> }
> }
> - fi = &kvm->arch.float_int;
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&fi->lock, flags);
> - for (i = 0; i < FIRQ_LIST_COUNT; i++) {
> - list_for_each_entry(inti, &fi->lists[i], list) {
> - if (n == max_irqs) {
> - /* signal userspace to try again */
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto out;
> - }
> - inti_to_irq(inti, &buf[n]);
> - n++;
> - }
> - }
> - if (test_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->pending_irqs) ||
> - test_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE_EV, &fi->pending_irqs)) {
> - if (n == max_irqs) {
> - /* signal userspace to try again */
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto out;
> - }
> - irq = (struct kvm_s390_irq *) &buf[n];
> - irq->type = KVM_S390_INT_SERVICE;
> - irq->u.ext = fi->srv_signal;
> - n++;
> - }
> - if (test_bit(IRQ_PEND_MCHK_REP, &fi->pending_irqs)) {
> - if (n == max_irqs) {
> - /* signal userspace to try again */
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto out;
> - }
> - irq = (struct kvm_s390_irq *) &buf[n];
> - irq->type = KVM_S390_MCHK;
> - irq->u.mchk = fi->mchk;
> - n++;
> -}
>
> -out:
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fi->lock, flags);
> -out_nolock:
> - if (!ret && n > 0) {
> - if (copy_to_user(usrbuf, buf, sizeof(struct kvm_s390_irq) * n))
> - ret = -EFAULT;
> + if (n > 0 && copy_to_user(usrbuf, buf, sizeof(struct kvm_s390_irq) * n)) {
> + /* restore removed bits if returning failure */
> + if (tmp)
> + __atomic_or(tmp, (void *)&gi->origin->ipm);
> + return -EFAULT;
> }
> - vfree(buf);
>
> - return ret < 0 ? ret : n;
> + return n;
> }
>
> static int flic_ais_mode_get_all(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-11 15:56 [PATCH v1 00/11] KVM: s390: And then... even more fixes again Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] KVM: s390: Properly handle NULL pointer in dat_cond_set_storage_key() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 7:02 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-12 8:06 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] KVM: s390: Use srcu in kvm_arch_vcpu_unlocked_ioctl() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 17:26 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-11 18:01 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] KVM: s390: Fix get_all_floating_irqs() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 7:11 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2026-08-12 9:12 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] KVM: s390: Fix dirty marking in adapter_indicators_set*() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] KVM: s390: Fix pgste_get_trylock_multiple() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 17:07 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] KVM: s390: Introduce extended topup for struct kvm_s390_mmu_cache Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] KVM: s390: Move all code into kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 8:39 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] KVM: s390: Fix IRQ injection with SIGP Stop and Store Status Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] KVM: s390: Fix kvm_s390_clear_pv_state() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-12 7:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-12 8:07 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] KVM: s390: Fix potential tiny kernel stack leak Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-11 17:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-11 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] KVM: s390: Fix _gaccess_shadow_fault() Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6cc80fa3-f506-4fff-970a-2cbd66d9ce49@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox