Re: [PATCH v8 3/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Rename and move vcpu_get_perf_capabilities() to pmu.h

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Header files pmu.h and pmu_intel.h lack required includes, violating self-contained header practices.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v8 3/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Rename and move vcpu_get_perf_capabilities() to pmu.h ---
commit 7eb009fb5328b80368e10acda6cfe621b3e1e1c0
Author: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>

KVM: x86/pmu: Rename and move vcpu_get_perf_capabilities() to pmu.h

This commit renames vcpu_get_perf_capabilities() to kvm_vcpu_get_perf_caps()
and moves it to the common x86 PMU header. This prepares the function to be
called from common x86 code to check the guest's PERF_METRICS capability.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
> index 090c9bbb74f48..82f955e5a4507 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -271,6 +271,14 @@ static inline bool kvm_pmu_is_fastpath_emulation_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  				  X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
>  }
>  
> +static inline u64 kvm_vcpu_get_perf_caps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	if (!guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PDCM))
> +		return 0;

[Severity: Low]
Does this file need to include cpuid.h? guest_cpu_cap_has() is used here,
but pmu.h does not include the header that defines it.

> +
> +	return vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities;
> +}
> +
>  void kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.h
> index 5d9357640aa18..dd447d8b6fdde 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.h
> @@ -4,19 +4,9 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>  
> -#include "cpuid.h"
> -
> -static inline u64 vcpu_get_perf_capabilities(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> -	if (!guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PDCM))
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	return vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities;
> -}
> -
>  static inline bool fw_writes_is_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	return (vcpu_get_perf_capabilities(vcpu) & PERF_CAP_FW_WRITES) != 0;
> +	return (kvm_vcpu_get_perf_caps(vcpu) & PERF_CAP_FW_WRITES) != 0;

[Severity: Low]
Should pmu_intel.h include pmu.h? It calls kvm_vcpu_get_perf_caps() which
is now defined in pmu.h, but the include appears to be missing.

>  }
>  
>  bool intel_pmu_lbr_is_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260817183143.226156-1-zide.chen@intel.com?part=3