From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 16/20] KVM: x86: Add APX to supported XCR0
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 03:07:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902030708.8AA051F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902021804.718676-17-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Adding APX host support inflates KVM's FPU uabi_size beyond 4096 bytes for all VMs, completely breaking the KVM_GET_XSAVE and KVM_SET_XSAVE UAPIs for legacy VMMs on APX-capable hosts.
--
commit f809671f7be8f3b21dbbd90937f8c5a3e917c643
Author: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
KVM: x86: Add APX to supported XCR0
This commit sets kvm_caps.supported_xcr0 for APX when the host has enabled
the APX state and CONFIG_KVM_APX is configured. This allows KVM to expose
APX features to guests.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 76f70d2631f67..8c6365122efb8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -7132,6 +7132,8 @@ int kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops)
> if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE)) {
> kvm_host.xcr0 = xgetbv(XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK);
> kvm_caps.supported_xcr0 = kvm_host.xcr0 & KVM_SUPPORTED_XCR0;
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_APX))
> + kvm_caps.supported_xcr0 |= kvm_host.xcr0 & XFEATURE_MASK_APX;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does enabling APX host support here
inadvertently break the KVM_GET_XSAVE and KVM_SET_XSAVE UAPIs for legacy
VMMs?
Because APX (component 19) is a static user feature, its inclusion in
fpu_user_cfg.default_features requires an uncompacted offset that
accommodates the 8KB AMX (component 18) hole. This results in an uncompacted
offset greater than 10KB, which inflates fpu_user_cfg.default_size.
When KVM initializes a vCPU, it sets the baseline uabi_size to this
inflated value:
arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c:fpu_alloc_guest_fpstate() {
...
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(fpu_user_cfg.default_size > gfpu->uabi_size))
gfpu->uabi_size = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
...
}
Consequently, uabi_size grows beyond the standard 4096 bytes for all VMs.
For older VMMs attempting to use the standard 4096-byte buffers,
kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl() handles the UAPI boundary by unconditionally failing
KVM_GET_XSAVE with -EINVAL:
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl() {
...
case KVM_GET_XSAVE: {
r = -EINVAL;
if (vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.uabi_size > sizeof(struct kvm_xsave))
break;
...
}
Similarly, for KVM_SET_XSAVE, it reads out of bounds from the 4096-byte user
buffer, returning -EFAULT:
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl() {
...
case KVM_SET_XSAVE: {
int size = vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.uabi_size;
u.xsave = memdup_user(argp, size);
...
}
Could this deterministically break VM creation and live migration on
APX-capable hosts for legacy VMMs?
> }
>
> if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES)) {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902021804.718676-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com?part=16
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 2:17 [PATCH v7 00/20] KVM: x86: Enable APX for guests Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 01/20] KVM: x86: Extend VCPU registers for EGPRs Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 02/20] KVM: VMX: Save guest EGPRs in VCPU cache Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 3:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 03/20] KVM: x86: Support APX state for XSAVE ABI Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 3:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 04/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor VMX instruction information access Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 05/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor instruction information decoding Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 06/20] KVM: VMX: Remove unused control-register access defines Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 07/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor register index retrieval from exit qualification Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 08/20] KVM: VMX: Support instruction information extension Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 09/20] KVM: nVMX: Propagate extended instruction information Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 3:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 10/20] KVM: x86: Support EGPR accessing and tracking for emulator Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 11/20] KVM: x86: Handle EGPR index and REX2-incompatible opcodes Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 3:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 12/20] KVM: x86: Support REX2-prefixed opcode decode Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 13/20] KVM: x86: Reject EVEX-prefixed instructions Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 14/20] KVM: x86: Move KVM_SUPPORTED_{XCR0,XSS} into kvm_x86_vendor_init() Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:17 ` [PATCH v7 15/20] KVM: x86: Guard valid XCR0.APX settings Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:18 ` [PATCH v7 16/20] KVM: x86: Add APX to supported XCR0 Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 3:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 2:18 ` [PATCH v7 17/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX foundation feature to userspace Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 2:18 ` [PATCH v7 18/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX sub-features " Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 3:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 2:18 ` [PATCH v7 19/20] KVM: x86: selftests: Add APX state and ABI test Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02 3:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 2:18 ` [PATCH v7 20/20] KVM: x86: selftests: Add APX state handling and XCR0 sanity checks Chang S. Bae
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902030708.8AA051F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox