* [PATCH 0/3] Introduce Enhanced SMT Protection for SEV-SNP
@ 2026-09-14 16:55 Pratik R. Sampat
2026-09-14 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: SVM: Re-queue events that were never injected Pratik R. Sampat
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pratik R. Sampat @ 2026-09-14 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, x86, linux-kernel
Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, seanjc, pbonzini, thomas.lendacky,
kim.phillips, nikunj, michael.roth, ashish.kalra, prsampat
Enhanced SMT Protection (ESMTP) allows an SEV-SNP VM to require that,
while one of its vCPUs is in guest mode, every SMT sibling thread on
that physical core is either idle in host mode or running a vCPU the
guest itself has declared a legal sibling. This mitigates the
side-channel risk of sharing core resources with untrusted host threads
or with another guest.
Unlike core scheduling, where co-residency is a host kernel policy
expressed with cookies, ESMTP is enforced by hardware. The sibling mask
lives in the VMSA. The host is not trusted to run arbitrary kernel,
userspace, or interrupt-handling work on a sibling thread while an ESMTP
vCPU is active on that core.
Both KVM and the guest fully set the VCPU_SIBLING_MASK, which places
every vCPU of the guest in one group so that any two of them may be
co-resident. Combined with the ASID check, the sibling of a vCPU in
guest mode is then always either another vCPU of that same guest or a
thread idle in host mode.
Usage
-----
Requires patched OVMF [1] and QEMU [2] builds. Launch an SEV-SNP guest
with ESMTP enabled on the sev-snp-guest object:
-object sev-snp-guest,id=sev0,cbitpos=51,reduced-phys-bits=1,esmtp=on
ESMTP is opt-in because it carries a performance cost as VMRUN stalls
until the sibling runs work from a trusted vCPU or is in host idle.
The guest reports the feature in dmesg among the SNP feature names:
# dmesg | grep -i SEV
... SEV-SNP ... ESMTProt ...
Empirical test
--------------
* Identify siblings via:
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/topology/thread_siblings_list
* Pin the guest on the siblings
* Spawn a load in the guest e.g. via stress-ng --cpu 2 for SMT=2.
Expect the guest utilization % for both sibling CPUs to be at 100% as
the vCPU siblings are deemed trusted
* Spawn a load in the host latched onto one of the siblings.
E.g. taskset -C X stress-ng --cpu 1
* Expect CPU X's utilization to be shared between host and guest %.
Also expect drop in CPU utilization on the thread Sibling CPU as when
the host task runs the guest will be forced idle.
Patches based on cryptodev-2.6
[1]: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/13128
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/cover.1789399242.git.prsampat@amd.com/
Pratik R. Sampat (3):
KVM: SVM: Re-queue events that were never injected
KVM: SVM: Add host support for Enhanced SMT Protection
x86/sev: Add guest support for Enhanced SMT Protection
arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c | 13 ++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 5 +++-
arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 12 ++++++--
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h | 9 +++++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
9 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] KVM: SVM: Re-queue events that were never injected
2026-09-14 16:55 [PATCH 0/3] Introduce Enhanced SMT Protection for SEV-SNP Pratik R. Sampat
@ 2026-09-14 16:55 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2026-09-14 17:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: SVM: Add host support for Enhanced SMT Protection Pratik R. Sampat
2026-09-14 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/sev: Add guest " Pratik R. Sampat
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pratik R. Sampat @ 2026-09-14 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, x86, linux-kernel
Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, seanjc, pbonzini, thomas.lendacky,
kim.phillips, nikunj, michael.roth, ashish.kalra, prsampat
When injecting an event into the guest via the event_inj field, a
non-zero event_inj value on #VMEXIT means that the hardware was not able
to inject the event into the guest. This used to only occur for the
VMEXIT_INVALID intercept code, which was a fatal error and resulted in
the guest being torn down.
Enhanced SMT Protection (ESMTP) invalidates that assumption. When ESMTP
is enabled, VMRUN doesn't enter guest mode immediately; it stalls at a
synchronization point until every sibling thread is either idle or has
executed VMRUN for a legal sibling vCPU. If an ESMTP timeout / illegal
sibling exit / interrupt arrives while VMRUN is stalled, VMRUN can now
terminate with the corresponding #VMEXIT intercept code, without
entering guest mode, and thus without injecting the event.
For example, on a 2-way SMT core running vCPU0 on thread 0 and vCPU1 on
thread 1:
Thread 0 (vCPU0) Thread 1 (vCPU1)
---------------- ----------------
Interrupt A injected to the guest in host
VMRUN |
| |
v |
Stall waiting for sibling |
| |
| host INTR arrives on thread 0 |
| while it waits |
| |
v |
#VMEXIT v
Interrupt B injected to the guest idle
VMRUN
In this case injecting interrupt B clobbers the last event. Interrupt A
is never delivered and lost forvever.
Therefore, in preparation for ESMTP support, accommodate for potentially
lost interrupts by detecting an undelivered injected event and
re-queuing it so as not to lose the event.
svm_cancel_injection() already recovers a staged event this way and
becomes redundant, so fold it in.
Signed-off-by: Pratik R. Sampat <prsampat@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 7d59d301e1e5..5d15c706e43b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -4340,6 +4340,7 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
u8 vector;
int type;
+ struct vmcb_control_area *control = &svm->vmcb->control;
u32 exitintinfo = svm->vmcb->control.exit_int_info;
bool nmi_l1_to_l2 = svm->nmi_l1_to_l2;
bool soft_int_injected = svm->soft_int_injected;
@@ -4347,6 +4348,27 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
svm->nmi_l1_to_l2 = false;
svm->soft_int_injected = false;
+ /*
+ * Hardware clears EVENTINJ field when it injects an event.
+ * A non-empty EVENTINJ on #VMEXIT means the vCPU never entered guest
+ * mode, and thus that the event was never delivered. Migrate the event
+ * to EXITINTINFO so that it's requeued instead of being dropped.
+ *
+ * An undelivered event doesn't imply a fatal VMEXIT_INVALID. With
+ * Enhanced SMT Protection, VMRUN may exit with an ordinary #VMEXIT
+ * without having injected that event into the guest.
+ *
+ * Clobbering EXITINTINFO is safe precisely because the vCPU never
+ * entered guest mode.
+ */
+ if (control->event_inj) {
+ control->exit_int_info = control->event_inj;
+ control->exit_int_info_err = control->event_inj_err;
+ control->event_inj = 0;
+
+ exitintinfo = control->exit_int_info;
+ }
+
/*
* If we've made progress since setting awaiting_iret_completion, we've
* executed an IRET and can allow NMI injection.
@@ -4410,11 +4432,14 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static void svm_cancel_injection(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
- struct vmcb_control_area *control = &svm->vmcb->control;
- control->exit_int_info = control->event_inj;
- control->exit_int_info_err = control->event_inj_err;
- control->event_inj = 0;
+ /*
+ * EXITINTINFO is stale as it holds the event from the previous #VMEXIT
+ * (or from the last time the current VMCB was run). Invalidate it so
+ * that svm_complete_interrupts() requeues if and only if KVM staged an
+ * event in EVENTINJ.
+ */
+ svm->vmcb->control.exit_int_info = 0;
svm_complete_interrupts(vcpu);
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] KVM: SVM: Add host support for Enhanced SMT Protection
2026-09-14 16:55 [PATCH 0/3] Introduce Enhanced SMT Protection for SEV-SNP Pratik R. Sampat
2026-09-14 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: SVM: Re-queue events that were never injected Pratik R. Sampat
@ 2026-09-14 16:55 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2026-09-14 17:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/sev: Add guest " Pratik R. Sampat
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pratik R. Sampat @ 2026-09-14 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, x86, linux-kernel
Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, seanjc, pbonzini, thomas.lendacky,
kim.phillips, nikunj, michael.roth, ashish.kalra, prsampat
Enhanced SMT Protection (ESMTP) protects an SEV-SNP guest from SMT side
channels by requiring that, while a vCPU is in guest mode, its SMT sibling
thread is either idle in host mode or executing a vCPU the guest has
declared to be a legal sibling. A legal sibling is another ESMTP vCPU of
the same guest that carries the same VCPU_SIBLING_MASK and agrees on
VCPU_ID outside that mask.
Hardware enforces this at VMRUN, which no longer enters guest mode right
away but stalls until the condition holds. Three new exits report that it
could not be met, all of them non-fatal:
ESMTP_ILLSIB: a sibling thread is running a vCPU that is not a legal
sibling of this one.
ESMTP_TIMEOUT: the stall exceeded the timeout programmed in the VMCB. The
timer bounds how long VMRUN waits for the core to settle. A module
parameter exposes an interface to program this timer.
ESMTP_RETRY: If DBREQ is detected, VMRUN exits. ESMTP_RETRY indicates an
internal event and the hypervisor should execute a VMRUN.
Refer to the AMD64 APM Vol 2, section "AMD64 Enhanced SMT Protection".
Signed-off-by: Pratik R. Sampat <prsampat@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 12 ++++++--
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h | 9 +++++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 7 +++++
7 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
index f70ee74b5f92..4cf477e95c58 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
@@ -529,6 +529,7 @@
* and purposes if CLEAR_CPU_BUF_VM is set).
*/
#define X86_FEATURE_X2AVIC_EXT (21*32+20) /* AMD SVM x2AVIC support for 4k vCPUs */
+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_ESMTP (21*32+21) /* AMD Enhanced SMT Protection */
/*
* BUG word(s)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
index 3a8e51a0c9e8..fbcb3313e946 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
@@ -761,6 +761,7 @@
#define MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED_BIT 0
#define MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED_BIT)
#define MSR_AMD64_RMP_SEGMENT_SHIFT(x) (((x) & GENMASK_ULL(13, 8)) >> 8)
+#define MSR_AMD64_IDLE_WAKEUP_ICR 0xc0010137
#define MSR_SVSM_CAA 0xc001f000
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
index aa63431ba92c..323ab7089302 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
@@ -165,7 +165,8 @@ struct __attribute__ ((__packed__)) vmcb_control_area {
u8 reserved_9[22];
u64 allowed_sev_features; /* Offset 0x138 */
u64 guest_sev_features; /* Offset 0x140 */
- u8 reserved_10[664];
+ u64 esmtp_timeout; /* Offset 0x148 */
+ u8 reserved_10[656];
/*
* Offset 0x3e0, 32 bytes reserved
* for use by hypervisor/software.
@@ -310,6 +311,7 @@ static_assert((X2AVIC_4K_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID & AVIC_PHYSICAL_MAX_INDEX_MASK) == X2AV
#define SVM_SEV_FEAT_ALTERNATE_INJECTION BIT(4)
#define SVM_SEV_FEAT_DEBUG_SWAP BIT(5)
#define SVM_SEV_FEAT_SECURE_TSC BIT(9)
+#define SVM_SEV_FEAT_ESMTP BIT(17)
#define VMCB_ALLOWED_SEV_FEATURES_VALID BIT_ULL(63)
@@ -482,6 +484,11 @@ struct sev_es_save_area {
u8 fpreg_x87[80];
u8 fpreg_xmm[256];
u8 fpreg_ymm[256];
+ u8 reserved_0x670[560];
+
+ /* Enhanced SMT Protection */
+ u32 vcpu_id;
+ u32 vcpu_sibling_mask;
} __packed;
struct ghcb_save_area {
@@ -554,7 +561,7 @@ struct vmcb {
#define EXPECTED_VMCB_SAVE_AREA_SIZE 744
#define EXPECTED_GHCB_SAVE_AREA_SIZE 1032
-#define EXPECTED_SEV_ES_SAVE_AREA_SIZE 1648
+#define EXPECTED_SEV_ES_SAVE_AREA_SIZE 2216
#define EXPECTED_VMCB_CONTROL_AREA_SIZE 1024
#define EXPECTED_GHCB_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
@@ -589,6 +596,7 @@ static inline void __unused_size_checks(void)
BUILD_BUG_RESERVED_OFFSET(sev_es_save_area, 0x320);
BUILD_BUG_RESERVED_OFFSET(sev_es_save_area, 0x380);
BUILD_BUG_RESERVED_OFFSET(sev_es_save_area, 0x3f0);
+ BUILD_BUG_RESERVED_OFFSET(sev_es_save_area, 0x670);
BUILD_BUG_RESERVED_OFFSET(ghcb_save_area, 0x0);
BUILD_BUG_RESERVED_OFFSET(ghcb_save_area, 0xcc);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h
index 010a45c9f614..e59baf4b3c3f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/svm.h
@@ -135,6 +135,10 @@
#define SVM_EXIT_SW 0xf0000000ull
#define SVM_EXIT_ERR -1ull
+/* Enhanced SMT Protection VM exits taken during VMRUN sibling sync */
+#define SVM_EXIT_ESMTP_ILLSIB -5ull /* Illegal ESMTP sibling */
+#define SVM_EXIT_ESMTP_TIMEOUT -6ull /* ESMTP_TIMEOUT expired */
+#define SVM_EXIT_ESMTP_RETRY -7ull /* Internal event; retry VMRUN */
#define SVM_EXIT_REASONS \
{ SVM_EXIT_READ_CR0, "read_cr0" }, \
@@ -246,7 +250,10 @@
{ SVM_VMGEXIT_EXT_GUEST_REQUEST, "vmgexit_ext_guest_request" }, \
{ SVM_VMGEXIT_AP_CREATION, "vmgexit_ap_creation" }, \
{ SVM_VMGEXIT_HV_FEATURES, "vmgexit_hypervisor_feature" }, \
- { SVM_EXIT_ERR, "invalid_guest_state" }
+ { SVM_EXIT_ERR, "invalid_guest_state" }, \
+ { SVM_EXIT_ESMTP_ILLSIB, "esmtp_illsib" }, \
+ { SVM_EXIT_ESMTP_TIMEOUT, "esmtp_timeout" }, \
+ { SVM_EXIT_ESMTP_RETRY, "esmtp_retry" }
#endif /* _UAPI__SVM_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
index 8665a6474806..16620fa0e290 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_bit cpuid_bits[] = {
{ X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2, CPUID_EAX, 0, 0x80000022, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_V2, CPUID_EAX, 1, 0x80000022, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_PMC_FREEZE, CPUID_EAX, 2, 0x80000022, 0 },
+ { X86_FEATURE_AMD_ESMTP, CPUID_EDX, 1, 0x80000025, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_AMD_HTR_CORES, CPUID_EAX, 30, 0x80000026, 0 },
{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }
};
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index 5705723f1f41..edb99af4d6a6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ module_param_named(sev_snp, sev_snp_enabled, bool, 0444);
static unsigned int __ro_after_init nr_ciphertext_hiding_asids;
module_param_named(ciphertext_hiding_asids, nr_ciphertext_hiding_asids, uint, 0444);
+static unsigned long esmtp_timeout_ns;
+module_param(esmtp_timeout_ns, ulong, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(esmtp_timeout_ns,
+ "ESMTP VMRUN sibling-wait timeout in nanoseconds (0 disables the timer)");
+
#define AP_RESET_HOLD_NONE 0
#define AP_RESET_HOLD_NAE_EVENT 1
#define AP_RESET_HOLD_MSR_PROTO 2
@@ -506,7 +511,7 @@ static int __sev_guest_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp,
return -EINVAL;
if (!snp_active)
- valid_vmsa_features &= ~SVM_SEV_FEAT_SECURE_TSC;
+ valid_vmsa_features &= ~(SVM_SEV_FEAT_SECURE_TSC | SVM_SEV_FEAT_ESMTP);
if (data->vmsa_features & ~valid_vmsa_features)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1021,6 +1026,15 @@ static int sev_es_sync_vmsa(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
save->sev_features = sev->vmsa_features;
+ if (sev->vmsa_features & SVM_SEV_FEAT_ESMTP) {
+ save->vcpu_id = vcpu->vcpu_id;
+ /*
+ * All vCPUs of a guest are put into one group and can be run
+ * co-resident on the sibling thread of the same core.
+ */
+ save->vcpu_sibling_mask = U32_MAX;
+ }
+
/*
* Skip FPU and AVX setup with KVM_SEV_ES_INIT to avoid
* breaking older measurements.
@@ -3083,6 +3097,30 @@ static const char * __init sev_str_feature_state(bool is_supported, bool is_usab
return is_supported ? is_usable ? "enabled" : "unusable" : "disabled";
}
+static bool sev_esmtp_setup_wakeup_icr(void)
+{
+ unsigned int cpu, sibling;
+ bool wrmsr_success = true;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ for_each_cpu(sibling, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu)) {
+ u64 icr;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (sibling == cpu)
+ continue;
+
+ icr = (u64)per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, sibling) << 32;
+ icr |= LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR & 0xff;
+ ret = wrmsrq_safe_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_AMD64_IDLE_WAKEUP_ICR, icr);
+ if (ret)
+ wrmsr_success = false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return wrmsr_success;
+}
+
void __init sev_hardware_setup(void)
{
unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx, sev_asid_count, sev_es_asid_count;
@@ -3259,6 +3297,10 @@ void __init sev_hardware_setup(void)
if (sev_snp_enabled && tsc_khz && cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SNP_SECURE_TSC))
sev_supported_vmsa_features |= SVM_SEV_FEAT_SECURE_TSC;
+
+ if (sev_snp_enabled && cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_AMD_ESMTP) &&
+ sev_esmtp_setup_wakeup_icr())
+ sev_supported_vmsa_features |= SVM_SEV_FEAT_ESMTP;
}
void sev_hardware_unsetup(void)
@@ -4792,6 +4834,10 @@ static void sev_es_init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm, bool init_event)
svm->vmcb->control.allowed_sev_features = sev->vmsa_features |
VMCB_ALLOWED_SEV_FEATURES_VALID;
+ if (sev->vmsa_features & SVM_SEV_FEAT_ESMTP)
+ svm->vmcb->control.esmtp_timeout = mul_u64_u32_div(esmtp_timeout_ns,
+ tsc_khz, 1000000);
+
/* Can't intercept CR register access, HV can't modify CR registers */
svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR0_READ);
svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR4_READ);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 5d15c706e43b..a1d77ce041b7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -3743,6 +3743,13 @@ static int svm_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, fastpath_t exit_fastpath)
return 0;
}
+ if (svm->vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_ESMTP_RETRY ||
+ svm->vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_ESMTP_ILLSIB ||
+ svm->vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_ESMTP_TIMEOUT) {
+ cond_resched();
+ return 1;
+ }
+
if (exit_fastpath != EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE)
return 1;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] x86/sev: Add guest support for Enhanced SMT Protection
2026-09-14 16:55 [PATCH 0/3] Introduce Enhanced SMT Protection for SEV-SNP Pratik R. Sampat
2026-09-14 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: SVM: Re-queue events that were never injected Pratik R. Sampat
2026-09-14 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: SVM: Add host support for Enhanced SMT Protection Pratik R. Sampat
@ 2026-09-14 16:55 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2026-09-14 17:11 ` sashiko-bot
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pratik R. Sampat @ 2026-09-14 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, x86, linux-kernel
Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, seanjc, pbonzini, thomas.lendacky,
kim.phillips, nikunj, michael.roth, ashish.kalra, prsampat
Enhanced SMT Protection requires every VMSA to carry the vCPU's identity
and the mask of SMT siblings it may co-run with. The guest builds the
VMSA itself when bringing up an AP, so populate both fields there, before
the page is turned into a VMSA and while it is still writable.
Fully set the sibling mask so that all threads of the same guest trust
each other.
Signed-off-by: Pratik R. Sampat <prsampat@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 4 +++-
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
index c6512f2ea31e..44bc14ee27c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ bool sev_es_check_ghcb_fault(unsigned long address)
MSR_AMD64_SNP_RESERVED_BIT13 | \
MSR_AMD64_SNP_RESERVED_BIT15 | \
MSR_AMD64_SNP_SECURE_AVIC | \
- MSR_AMD64_SNP_RESERVED_BITS19_22 | \
+ MSR_AMD64_SNP_RESERVED_BITS20_22 | \
MSR_AMD64_SNP_RESERVED_MASK)
#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_SECURE_AVIC
diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
index cc292d7c6fd1..730cff2700d4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static const char * const sev_status_feat_names[] = {
[MSR_AMD64_SNP_VMSA_REG_PROT_BIT] = "VMSARegProt",
[MSR_AMD64_SNP_SMT_PROT_BIT] = "SMTProt",
[MSR_AMD64_SNP_SECURE_AVIC_BIT] = "SecureAVIC",
+ [MSR_AMD64_SNP_ESMT_PROT_BIT] = "ESMTProt",
[MSR_AMD64_SNP_IBPB_ON_ENTRY_BIT] = "IBPBOnEntry",
};
@@ -849,6 +850,18 @@ static int wakeup_cpu_via_vmgexit(u32 apic_id, unsigned long start_ip, unsigned
vmsa->vmpl = snp_vmpl;
vmsa->sev_features = sev_status >> 2;
+ if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SEV_SNP) &&
+ (sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SNP_ESMT_PROT)) {
+ vmsa->vcpu_id = apic_id;
+ /*
+ * The mask fully set puts every vCPU in one group, so any two
+ * of them may be co-resident. A legal ESMTP sibling must
+ * also match on ASID, so the sibling of a vCPU in guest mode is
+ * always either another vCPU of this same guest or idle.
+ */
+ vmsa->vcpu_sibling_mask = U32_MAX;
+ }
+
/* Populate AP's TSC scale/offset to get accurate TSC values. */
if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SNP_SECURE_TSC)) {
vmsa->tsc_scale = snp_tsc_scale;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
index fbcb3313e946..6fd26151d146 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
@@ -745,7 +745,9 @@
#define MSR_AMD64_SNP_SMT_PROT BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SNP_SMT_PROT_BIT)
#define MSR_AMD64_SNP_SECURE_AVIC_BIT 18
#define MSR_AMD64_SNP_SECURE_AVIC BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SNP_SECURE_AVIC_BIT)
-#define MSR_AMD64_SNP_RESERVED_BITS19_22 GENMASK_ULL(22, 19)
+#define MSR_AMD64_SNP_ESMT_PROT_BIT 19
+#define MSR_AMD64_SNP_ESMT_PROT BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SNP_ESMT_PROT_BIT)
+#define MSR_AMD64_SNP_RESERVED_BITS20_22 GENMASK_ULL(22, 20)
#define MSR_AMD64_SNP_IBPB_ON_ENTRY_BIT 23
#define MSR_AMD64_SNP_IBPB_ON_ENTRY BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SNP_IBPB_ON_ENTRY_BIT)
#define MSR_AMD64_SNP_RESV_BIT 24
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/sev: Add guest support for Enhanced SMT Protection
2026-09-14 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/sev: Add guest " Pratik R. Sampat
@ 2026-09-14 17:11 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-09-14 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pratik R. Sampat; +Cc: kvm
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Hyper-V SEV-SNP AP boot path entirely ignores ESMT, leaving VMSA fields as zeroes.
- [Low] The tools header for msr-index.h was not synchronized with the kernel header changes.
--
commit 8604f276ddd2e9fc69ba0b3ddf175ec09324c70a
Author: Pratik R. Sampat <prsampat@amd.com>
x86/sev: Add guest support for Enhanced SMT Protection
This commit enables guest support for Enhanced SMT Protection by
populating the vCPU's identity and SMT sibling mask in the VMSA during
AP bringup. The sibling mask is fully set to allow threads of the same
guest to be co-resident.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
> index ecd77d3217f3c..acf25eca1a5c9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -849,6 +850,18 @@ static int wakeup_cpu_via_vmgexit(u32 apic_id, unsigned long start_ip, unsigned
> vmsa->vmpl = snp_vmpl;
> vmsa->sev_features = sev_status >> 2;
>
> + if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SEV_SNP) &&
> + (sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SNP_ESMT_PROT)) {
> + vmsa->vcpu_id = apic_id;
> + /*
> + * The mask fully set puts every vCPU in one group, so any two
> + * of them may be co-resident. A legal ESMTP sibling must
> + * also match on ASID, so the sibling of a vCPU in guest mode is
> + * always either another vCPU of this same guest or idle.
> + */
> + vmsa->vcpu_sibling_mask = U32_MAX;
> + }
> +
> /* Populate AP's TSC scale/offset to get accurate TSC values. */
> if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SNP_SECURE_TSC)) {
[Severity: High]
Does the Hyper-V SEV-SNP AP boot path also need to initialize ESMT fields?
Looking at hv_snp_boot_ap() in arch/x86/hyperv/ivm.c, the VMSA is initialized
without the new ESMT fields:
arch/x86/hyperv/ivm.c:hv_snp_boot_ap() {
...
vmsa->vmpl = 0;
vmsa->sev_features = sev_status >> 2;
ret = snp_set_vmsa(vmsa, true);
...
}
If a Hyper-V SEV-SNP guest with >1 vCPUs is booted with ESMT enabled, the APs
will be launched with a sibling mask of 0. A mask of 0 does not intersect with
any other mask, which could prevent the AP from being co-scheduled with any
sibling, leading to a hardware violation or a failure to boot APs.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index ee9fb820a1cd7..638867e7b4ec2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -745,7 +745,9 @@
> #define MSR_AMD64_SNP_SMT_PROT BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SNP_SMT_PROT_BIT)
> #define MSR_AMD64_SNP_SECURE_AVIC_BIT 18
> #define MSR_AMD64_SNP_SECURE_AVIC BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SNP_SECURE_AVIC_BIT)
> -#define MSR_AMD64_SNP_RESERVED_BITS19_22 GENMASK_ULL(22, 19)
> +#define MSR_AMD64_SNP_ESMT_PROT_BIT 19
> +#define MSR_AMD64_SNP_ESMT_PROT BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SNP_ESMT_PROT_BIT)
> +#define MSR_AMD64_SNP_RESERVED_BITS20_22 GENMASK_ULL(22, 20)
[Severity: Low]
Does tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h need to be synchronized with
these changes?
Currently, MSR_AMD64_SNP_RESERVED_BITS19_22 remains defined in the tools
header without the ESMT_PROT definitions. This missed synchronization could
lead to inconsistencies or warnings when building tools that depend on this
header.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1789399214.git.prsampat@amd.com?part=3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: SVM: Add host support for Enhanced SMT Protection
2026-09-14 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: SVM: Add host support for Enhanced SMT Protection Pratik R. Sampat
@ 2026-09-14 17:13 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-09-14 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pratik R. Sampat; +Cc: kvm
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] MSR_AMD64_IDLE_WAKEUP_ICR is only programmed for online CPUs during module load without CPU hotplug locks, breaking ESMTP on hotplugged CPUs.
- [High] Immediate retry on ESMTP_ILLSIB and ESMTP_TIMEOUT exits with cond_resched() causes a kernel livelock and violates SRCU locking invariants.
- [Medium] Missing teardown of MSR_AMD64_IDLE_WAKEUP_ICR on KVM module unload leads to permanent spurious IPIs.
--
commit 6679aa4cd87f7de484f6cabf547ea6d6220bfceb
Author: Pratik R. Sampat <prsampat@amd.com>
KVM: SVM: Add host support for Enhanced SMT Protection
This commit introduces support for Enhanced SMT Protection (ESMTP) to protect
SEV-SNP guests from SMT side channels. It adds logic to program the host's
wakeup IPIs and handles three new non-fatal VMRUN exits (ESMTP_ILLSIB,
ESMTP_TIMEOUT, ESMTP_RETRY) by yielding the CPU.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 944aaea6501f2..9bafb671a8b7f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3045,6 +3059,30 @@ static const char * __init sev_str_feature_state(bool is_supported, bool is_usable)
> return is_supported ? is_usable ? "enabled" : "unusable" : "disabled";
> }
>
> +static bool sev_esmtp_setup_wakeup_icr(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int cpu, sibling;
> + bool wrmsr_success = true;
> +
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + for_each_cpu(sibling, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu)) {
[Severity: High]
Could this break ESMTP on hotplugged CPUs?
This loop only touches currently online CPUs during module load and does so
without holding cpus_read_lock(). Because this is a one-time invocation
during module init, any CPU brought online after the KVM module is loaded
will lack the required MSR programming.
Hardware will then fail to wake the sibling upon CC6 idle, causing VMRUN
to indefinitely stall and trigger ESMTP_TIMEOUT exits on those hotplugged
CPUs.
> + u64 icr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (sibling == cpu)
> + continue;
> +
> + icr = (u64)per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, sibling) << 32;
> + icr |= LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR & 0xff;
> + ret = wrmsrq_safe_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_AMD64_IDLE_WAKEUP_ICR, icr);
> + if (ret)
> + wrmsr_success = false;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return wrmsr_success;
> +}
> +
> void __init sev_hardware_setup(void)
> {
> unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx, sev_asid_count, sev_es_asid_count;
[ ... ]
> @@ -3221,6 +3259,10 @@ void __init sev_hardware_setup(void)
>
> if (sev_snp_enabled && tsc_khz && cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SNP_SECURE_TSC))
> sev_supported_vmsa_features |= SVM_SEV_FEAT_SECURE_TSC;
> +
> + if (sev_snp_enabled && cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_AMD_ESMTP) &&
> + sev_esmtp_setup_wakeup_icr())
> + sev_supported_vmsa_features |= SVM_SEV_FEAT_ESMTP;
[Severity: Medium]
Will this lead to permanent spurious IPIs when the KVM module is unloaded?
MSR_AMD64_IDLE_WAKEUP_ICR is programmed globally on all online CPUs to send a
local timer IPI when a CPU enters CC6 idle. However, I don't see a teardown
path (like in sev_hardware_unsetup) restoring this MSR to zero.
After the KVM module is unloaded, the CPUs will permanently continue sending
spurious local timer IPIs to their siblings upon idling, which could cause
host power regressions and prevent deep sleep.
> }
>
> void sev_hardware_unsetup(void)
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index e2be2cd86c320..0b128f7911348 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3732,6 +3732,13 @@ static int svm_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, fastpath_t exit_fastpath)
> return 0;
> }
>
> + if (svm->vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_ESMTP_RETRY ||
> + svm->vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_ESMTP_ILLSIB ||
> + svm->vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_ESMTP_TIMEOUT) {
> + cond_resched();
> + return 1;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Does this immediate retry create a kernel livelock and violate SRCU invariants?
If the runqueue has no other tasks (TIF_NEED_RESCHED is false), cond_resched()
does nothing. The vCPU immediately attempts VMRUN again, hits the exact same
hardware conflict, and exits again. This creates a tight spin loop that can
peg the host CPU at 100% utilization.
Additionally, if a task is pending, cond_resched() yields the CPU while
holding KVM's SRCU read lock, because svm_handle_exit() is invoked within
the vcpu_enter_guest() SRCU critical section. This would stall
synchronize_srcu() indefinitely and bypass KVM's safe
xfer_to_guest_mode_handle_work() protocol.
> +
> if (exit_fastpath != EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE)
> return 1;
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1789399214.git.prsampat@amd.com?part=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: SVM: Re-queue events that were never injected
2026-09-14 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: SVM: Re-queue events that were never injected Pratik R. Sampat
@ 2026-09-14 17:16 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-09-14 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pratik R. Sampat; +Cc: kvm
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] svm_complete_interrupts() incorrectly checks if (control->event_inj) instead of the SVM_EVTINJ_VALID bit, which can silently drop valid hardware-reported events (like guest page faults) by clobbering EXITINTINFO.
--
commit 50716e3ba11eb9d000a0186ffad984ac08df1dcb
Author: Pratik R. Sampat <prsampat@amd.com>
KVM: SVM: Re-queue events that were never injected
When injecting an event into the guest via the event_inj field, a non-zero
event_inj value on #VMEXIT means the hardware was unable to inject it.
This commit adds a check to recover potentially lost interrupts by detecting
an undelivered injected event and re-queuing it.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index d0971685034b9..e2be2cd86c320 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4323,6 +4324,27 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> svm->nmi_l1_to_l2 = false;
> svm->soft_int_injected = false;
>
> + /*
> + * Hardware clears EVENTINJ field when it injects an event.
> + * A non-empty EVENTINJ on #VMEXIT means the vCPU never entered guest
> + * mode, and thus that the event was never delivered. Migrate the event
> + * to EXITINTINFO so that it's requeued instead of being dropped.
> + *
> + * An undelivered event doesn't imply a fatal VMEXIT_INVALID. With
> + * Enhanced SMT Protection, VMRUN may exit with an ordinary #VMEXIT
> + * without having injected that event into the guest.
> + *
> + * Clobbering EXITINTINFO is safe precisely because the vCPU never
> + * entered guest mode.
> + */
> + if (control->event_inj) {
[Severity: High]
Does this code silently drop valid hardware-reported events?
If an L1 hypervisor sets event_inj to a non-zero value but leaves the
SVM_EVTINJ_VALID bit clear, hardware will ignore the injection and won't
clear EVENTINJ.
If a genuine exception occurs in the L2 guest that populates EXITINTINFO,
this check incorrectly evaluates to true since event_inj is non-zero.
This causes EXITINTINFO to be clobbered with the L1's invalid event_inj
data. Because the clobbered value lacks the VALID bit, KVM will then ignore
it and drop the event.
Should this code check the SVM_EVTINJ_VALID bit instead of checking for a
non-zero event_inj value?
> + control->exit_int_info = control->event_inj;
> + control->exit_int_info_err = control->event_inj_err;
> + control->event_inj = 0;
> +
> + exitintinfo = control->exit_int_info;
> + }
> +
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1789399214.git.prsampat@amd.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-14 17:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-14 16:55 [PATCH 0/3] Introduce Enhanced SMT Protection for SEV-SNP Pratik R. Sampat
2026-09-14 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: SVM: Re-queue events that were never injected Pratik R. Sampat
2026-09-14 17:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: SVM: Add host support for Enhanced SMT Protection Pratik R. Sampat
2026-09-14 17:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/sev: Add guest " Pratik R. Sampat
2026-09-14 17:11 ` sashiko-bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).