Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/28] KVM: x86: Introduce memory fault on invalid hypercalls reads/writes
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 08:33:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918083322.C87F11F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918081543.139871-6-pbonzini@redhat.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] x86/hyperv: spurious memory fault on HVCALL_SIGNAL_EVENT due to double validation
--

commit 9e7f4342fa28fd49b13df88579465f8fb51e4a93
Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
KVM: x86: Introduce memory fault on invalid hypercalls reads/writes

This commit allows userspace to perform arbitrary actions when a hypercall
refers to an invalid address, by exiting with KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> index 604651cb27399..9f5adcd26cba3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> @@ -2547,11 +2617,30 @@ static bool hv_check_hypercall_access(struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv_vcpu, u16 code)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +static int kvm_hv_hypercall_userspace_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					   struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
> +{
> +	int r;
> +
> +	r = kvm_hv_hypercall_check_params(vcpu, hc);
> +	if (r)
> +		return r;

[Severity: High]
Does this code perform a physical memory validation on hc->ingpa, which has
already been overwritten with the connection ID for slow hypercalls?

When a guest makes a slow HVCALL_SIGNAL_EVENT hypercall with a connection ID
that is valid in userspace but not registered in the kernel conn_to_evt,
kvm_hvcall_signal_event() reads the connection ID and overwrites hc->ingpa:

kvm_hvcall_signal_event() {
	if (unlikely(!hc->fast)) {
		...
		ret = kvm_vcpu_read_guest(vcpu, gpa,
					  &hc->ingpa, sizeof(hc->ingpa));
	...
}

It then returns HV_STATUS_INVALID_PORT_ID, and the switch statement in
kvm_hv_hypercall() falls through to HVCALL_POST_MESSAGE and calls
kvm_hv_hypercall_userspace_exit().

Will this cause a spurious KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT instead of a normal
KVM_EXIT_HYPERV because kvm_hv_hypercall_check_params() incorrectly
re-validates the overwritten hc->ingpa as a GPA?

> +
> +	vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERV;
> +	vcpu->run->hyperv.type = KVM_EXIT_HYPERV_HCALL;
> +	vcpu->run->hyperv.u.hcall.input = hc->param;
> +	vcpu->run->hyperv.u.hcall.params[0] = hc->ingpa;
> +	vcpu->run->hyperv.u.hcall.params[1] = hc->outgpa;
> +	vcpu->arch.complete_userspace_io = kvm_hv_hypercall_complete_userspace;
> +	return 0;
> +}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918081543.139871-1-pbonzini@redhat.com?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-18  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-18  8:15 [PATCH v2 00/28] KVM: x86: Introduce memory protection attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 01/28] KVM: selftests: Take into account mixed memory fault flags Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 02/28] KVM: Define and communicate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT RWX flags to userspace Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 03/28] KVM: selftests: Test address translation for Hyper-V direct L2 hypercalls Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 04/28] KVM: apply nGPA->GPA translation to KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 05/28] KVM: x86: Introduce memory fault on invalid hypercalls reads/writes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:33   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 06/28] KVM: selftests: test hypercall memory fault exits Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/28] KVM: x86/mmu: intersect writability from __kvm_faultin_pfn with fault->map_writable Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend map_writable to a full ACC_* mask Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Init memslot hugepage information for non-private_mem VMs too Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 10/28] KVM: pass kvm == NULL case to kvm_arch_has_private_mem Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 11/28] KVM: adjust for presence of more than one attribute Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 12/28] KVM: Introduce NR/NW/NX memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 13/28] KVM: Include memory protections in result of gfn->hva conversion Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 14/28] KVM: Introduce kvm_fetch_guest_page() and use it for x86 Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 15/28] KVM: Take memory protections into account for memory read/write/fetch Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 16/28] KVM: Encapsulate memattrs array into anonymous struct Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 17/28] KVM: Introduce kvm_check_gen()/kvm_memslots_check_gen() Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 18/28] KVM: Introduce a generation number for memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 19/28] KVM: Take memory protections into account for accesses with cached gfn->hva Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 20/28] KVM: pfncache: Fail to refresh if it contains memory protections Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 21/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Take memory protection attributes into account during faults Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 22/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Issue memory fault exit if walk failed due to memory attribute Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 23/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not update accessed/dirty if guest PTE is read-only Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 24/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not prefetch sptes on gfns backed by memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 25/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Obsolete all roots if memattr contains gPTEs Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 26/28] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory protection attributes test Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 27/28] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes PTE test Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:15 ` [PATCH v2 28/28] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes side-channel tests Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18  8:43   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260918083322.C87F11F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox