From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/31] KVM: x86/mmu: Take memory protection attributes into account during faults
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 14:57:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918145721.B19901F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918135030.171564-26-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] kvm: trace buffer spam on AMD with GMET enabled
--
commit e48ad04487bab345ee62e42a2457d15e6edd7180
Author: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@amazon.com>
Subject: KVM: x86/mmu: Take memory protection attributes into account during faults
This commit adds support for memory protection attributes during guest page
faults, injecting a user-space -EFAULT exit for prohibited accesses. It also
adds a trace event that is intended to trigger only when memory protection
attributes restrict access.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 3c926f95f87be..6bbecbae2f8c4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
[ ... ]
> +static inline unsigned kvm_get_gfn_protections(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> + unsigned int access = vcpu->arch.mmu->root_role.access;
> + unsigned long attrs = kvm_get_memory_attributes(kvm, gfn);
> + if (!attrs)
> + return access;
> +
[ ... ]
> +static int kvm_faultin_memory_protections(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> +{
> + unsigned access;
> +
> + /* Memory attributes don't apply to MMIO regions */
> + if (unlikely(!fault->slot))
> + return RET_PF_CONTINUE;
> +
> + access = kvm_get_gfn_protections(vcpu, fault->gfn);
> + if (access == ACC_ALL)
> + return RET_PF_CONTINUE;
> +
> + trace_kvm_faultin_memory_protections(vcpu, fault, access);
[Severity: Medium]
Will this check effectively prevent trace buffer spam on AMD processors
with Guest Mode Execute Trap (GMET) enabled?
When GMET is enabled, KVM sets the root_role.access for the TDP MMU to
ACC_ALL & ~ACC_USER_MASK. Since kvm_get_gfn_protections() initializes the
access mask using vcpu->arch.mmu->root_role.access, it will return the
restricted mask even if no memory attributes are present.
If access is restricted by GMET, the condition checking if access == ACC_ALL
evaluates to false, which causes the trace event to trigger unconditionally
on every page fault. Could this lead to noticeable performance regressions
during tracing on these systems?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918135030.171564-2-pbonzini@redhat.com?part=25
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 13:49 [PATCH v3 00/28] KVM: x86: Introduce memory protection attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 01/31] KVM: x86/hyperv: do not overwrite hc->ingpa for slow SIGNAL_EVENT hypercall Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 02/31] KVM: selftests: Take into account mixed memory fault flags Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 03/31] KVM: Define and communicate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT RWX flags to userspace Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 04/31] KVM: selftests: Test address translation for Hyper-V direct L2 hypercalls Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 05/31] KVM: apply nGPA->GPA translation to KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 06/31] KVM: x86: Introduce memory fault on invalid hypercalls reads/writes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 16:56 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 07/31] KVM: selftests: test hypercall memory fault exits Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 08/31] KVM: x86/mmu: intersect writability from __kvm_faultin_pfn with fault->map_writable Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 09/31] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend map_writable to a full ACC_* mask Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 10/31] KVM: x86/mmu: Init memslot hugepage information for non-private_mem VMs too Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 11/31] KVM: pass kvm == NULL case to kvm_arch_has_private_mem Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 12/31] KVM: adjust for presence of more than one attribute Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 13/31] KVM: Introduce NR/NW/NX memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 14/31] KVM: Include memory protections in result of gfn->hva conversion Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 15/31] KVM: Introduce kvm_fetch_guest_page() and use it for x86 Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 16/31] KVM: Take memory protections into account for memory read/write/fetch Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 17/31] KVM: Take memory protections into account for __kvm_vcpu_map Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 18/31] KVM: Encapsulate memattrs array into anonymous struct Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 19/31] KVM: loongarch: do full validity check on the gfn-to-hva cache Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 20/31] KVM: Introduce kvm_check_gen()/kvm_memslots_check_gen() Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 21/31] KVM: Introduce a generation number for memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 22/31] KVM: Take memory protections into account for accesses with cached gfn->hva Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 23/31] KVM: pfncache: Fail to refresh if it contains memory protections Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 24/31] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not prefetch sptes on gfns backed by memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 25/31] KVM: x86/mmu: Take memory protection attributes into account during faults Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 26/31] KVM: x86/mmu: Issue memory fault exit if walk failed due to memory attribute Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 27/31] KVM: let kvm_arch_post_set_memory_attributes drop mmu_lock Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 28/31] KVM: x86/mmu: Obsolete all roots if memattr contains gPTEs Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 29/31] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory protection attributes test Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 30/31] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes PTE test Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 13:50 ` [PATCH 31/31] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes side-channel tests Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-18 14:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 00/28] KVM: x86: Introduce memory protection attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-09-21 16:56 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918145721.B19901F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).