From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Miao, Jun" <jun.miao@intel.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"tglx@kernel.org" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Block TSC multiplier writes for protected guest TSC
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 01:12:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33cc37f03fe011180b90c66787d5ee5e7456471a.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512111830.1295437-1-jun.miao@intel.com>
On Tue, 2026-05-12 at 07:18 -0400, Jun Miao wrote:
> Commit d5a4e408e69b ("KVM: x86: Add infrastructure for secure TSC")
The hash isn't correct. It should be adafea110600 AFAICT.
> added the guest_tsc_protected flag to prevent KVM from changing the
> TSC offset/multiplier of vCPUs whose TSC is managed by a confidential
> computing module (e.g. TDX, SEV-SNP Secure TSC). However only the TSC
> offset write path was guarded; kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_multiplier() was
> left unprotected.
>
> As a result, userspace can still change the TSC scaling ratio of a
> TDX vCPU via the KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ ioctl path:
>
> KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ
> -> kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl()
> -> kvm_set_tsc_khz()
> -> set_tsc_khz()
> -> kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_multiplier() <-- not guarded
Commit b24bbb534c2d ("KVM: x86: Reject KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ vCPU ioctl for TSC
protected guest") already added code to bail out early in kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl()
for TSC protected vCPU.
>
> and similarly during kvm_arch_vcpu_create() -> kvm_set_tsc_khz()
> which can reset the multiplier to default_tsc_scaling_ratio.
This is more like initialization of KVM's internal vCPU data structure based on
the default TSC (which is configured to the TD before creating any vCPU [*]), so
I think it is OK from functionality perspective. Note vt_write_tsc_multiplier()
simply does nothing for TD so it's safe. But since it is called after vcpu-
>arch.guest_tsc_protected is set, I agree it's kinda not nice.
[*] TDX's flow is: 1) userspace uses KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ vm-ioctl to configure the
default TSC; 2) userspace invokes KVM_TDX_INIT_VM, which configures the TD's TSC
using the default TSC; 3) userspace creates vCPUs for the TD, in which step vcpu
is marked as TSC protected.
After 3), both KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ vm-ioctl and vcpu-ioctl will fail to change the
TSC.
Theoretically, AFAICT there's a chance that if 1) gets called again with a
different TSC "after 2), but before 3)", KVM will have a wrong default TSC from
what is configured the the TD. But no sane userspace should ever do that.
>
> Make kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_multiplier() symmetric with
> kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_offset() by skipping the update when
> guest_tsc_protected is set. This single chokepoint covers all
> existing callers (set_tsc_khz() in both ioctl and vCPU create paths).
Fine with making kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_multiplier() symmetric to TSC offset,
though.
>
> Fixes: d5a4e408e69b ("KVM: x86: Add infrastructure for secure TSC")
> Signed-off-by: Jun Miao <jun.miao@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 0a1b63c63d1a..e935fe33d9c2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -2736,6 +2736,9 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 l1_offset)
>
> static void kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_multiplier(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 l1_multiplier)
> {
> + if (vcpu->arch.guest_tsc_protected)
> + return;
> +
> vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_scaling_ratio = l1_multiplier;
>
> /* Userspace is changing the multiplier while L2 is active */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 11:18 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Block TSC multiplier writes for protected guest TSC Jun Miao
2026-05-12 1:12 ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2026-05-12 1:29 ` Miao, Jun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33cc37f03fe011180b90c66787d5ee5e7456471a.camel@intel.com \
--to=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jun.miao@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox