* [PATCH v8 0/4] KVM: PPC: Expose CPU compatibility modes for nested guests
@ 2026-08-07 17:24 Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl Amit Machhiwal
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Amit Machhiwal @ 2026-08-07 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev, Madhavan Srinivasan
Cc: Vaibhav Jain, Amit Machhiwal, Anushree Mathur, Paolo Bonzini,
Nicholas Piggin, Michael Ellerman, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP),
Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, Ritesh Harjani, kvm, linux-kernel,
linux-doc
On POWER systems, newer processor generations can operate in compatibility
modes corresponding to earlier generations (e.g., a Power11 system running
in Power10 compatibility mode). In such cases, the effective CPU level
exposed to guests differs from the physical processor generation.
This creates a problem for nested virtualization. When booting a nested KVM
guest (L2) inside a host KVM guest (L1) running in a compatibility mode,
userspace (e.g., QEMU) may derive the CPU model from the raw hardware PVR
and attempt to configure the nested guest accordingly. However, the L1
partition is constrained by the compatibility level negotiated with the
hypervisor (L0), and requests exceeding that level are rejected, leading to
guest boot failures such as:
KVM-NESTEDv2: couldn't set guest wide elements
This series provides a mechanism for userspace to query the effective CPU
compatibility modes supported by the host, so it can select an appropriate
CPU model for nested guests.
To achieve this, the series introduces a new KVM capability and ioctl
(KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS / KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS) that expose the
compatibility modes supported by the host.
Why a new UAPI?
===============
While cpu-version is available in /proc/device-tree/cpus/<cpu#>/cpu-version
on both L1 booted on PowerNV and PowerVM LPARs, the UAPI approach is
preferable for several reasons:
1. pHYP (L0) capabilities: On PowerVM, we need to rely on capabilities
negotiated with pHYP in KVM, not just device tree properties. The
cpu-version property depicts the current compat mode but doesn't point
to what all compat modes are supported for the nested guest.
2. procfs dependency: Not all systems run with procfs enabled (CONFIG_PROC_FS
is optional). Minimal configurations like buildroot might disable it, but
KVM ioctl works regardless since it accesses kernel data structures
directly.
3. Kernel validation: The kernel validates and normalizes the compatibility
information, ensuring userspace gets validated, consistent data.
4. Abstraction & stability: /proc/device-tree is an implementation detail.
The UAPI provides a stable interface that won't break if the underlying
mechanism changes.
5. Semantic clarity: KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS clearly expresses what
compatibility modes can be used for KVM guests, vs. parsing device tree
which requires understanding the semantic meaning of cpu-version.
The implementation supports both:
- KVM on PowerVM (nested API v2), where compatibility information is
served from the cached nested_capabilities value, originally obtained
via the H_GUEST_GET_CAPABILITIES hypercall at module init.
- KVM on PowerNV (nested API v1), where compatibility is derived from the
device tree ("cpu-version") representing the effective processor
compatibility level.
This allows userspace (e.g., QEMU) to select a CPU model consistent with
the host compatibility mode, avoiding mismatches and enabling successful
nested guest boot.
Note: This series is built on top of patch [1] which must be applied first.
Patch [1] ensures arch_compat is validated against the host compatibility
mode before this series adds the capability query mechanism.
Commit e4de1b9cb3b5 ("powerpc/dt_cpu_ftrs: Set CPU_FTR_P11_PVR for Power11
and later processors") which was also a prerequisite has been merged upstream.
Changes in v8:
- Add PAGE_SIZE guard after get_user() to bound the check_zeroed_user()
scan in the usize > ksize path [Ritesh]
- Drop the manual usize > sizeof(host_caps) pre-check; delegate the
usize > ksize path entirely to copy_struct_from_user(), which succeeds
when trailing bytes are zero (valid forward-compat) and returns -E2BIG
only when they are non-zero. Handle -E2BIG by writing back ksize with
proper -EFAULT escalation if put_user() fails. [Ritesh]
- Fix host_caps.size writeback on success path: use
min_t(u64, usize, sizeof(host_caps)) instead of sizeof(host_caps) to
avoid reporting a larger size than the kernel actually populated when
new userspace passes a larger struct with zero trailing bytes. [Ritesh]
- Update documentation to reflect the corrected three-case versioning
contract and the revised E2BIG semantics. [Ritesh]
Patch summary:
[1/4] Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl
[2/4] Implement capability retrieval for KVM on PowerVM (API v2)
[3/4] Add KVM on PowerNV support (API v1)
[4/4] Document the new ioctl
Testing (with QEMU v5 patches and on top of patch [1]):
KVM APIv1 Testing
=================
On P10 PowerNV machine (L0)
---------------------------
- P10 L1 KVM guest -> works
- P10 nested L2 KVM guest -> works
- P9 compat nested L2 KVM guest -> works
- P9 compat L1 KVM guest -> works
- P9 nested L2 KVM guest -> works
On Powernv11 TCG Guest (L0)
---------------------------
- P11 PowerNV TCG L0 guest -> works
- P11 L1 KVM guest -> works
- P11 L2 KVM guest -> works
- P10 compat L1 KVM guest -> works
- P10 L2 KVM guest -> works
- P9 compat L1 KVM guest -> works
- P9 L2 KVM guest -> works
KVM APIv2 Testing
=================
On P11 PowerVM LPAR (L1)
------------------------
- P11 L2 KVM guest -> works
- P10 compat L2 KVM guest -> works
- P9 compat L2 KVM guest fails to boot as expected
- Without QEMU patches but Linux patches
- P11 L2 KVM guest -> works
- P10 compat L2 KVM guest -> works
- P9 compat L2 KVM guest fails to boot as expected
- Without Linux patches but QEMU patches
- P11 L2 KVM guest -> works
- P10 compat L2 KVM guest -> works
On P11 LPAR in P10 compat (L1)
------------------------------
- P10 (host compat) L2 KVM guest -> works
- Without QEMU patch but Linux patches
- P10 guest fails to boot as expected (error: kvm run failed Invalid argument)
- Without Linux patch but QEMU patches
- P10 guest fails to boot as expected (KVM: unknown exit, hardware reason ffffffffffffffea)
On P10 PowerVM LPAR (L1)
------------------------
- P10 L2 KVM guest -> works
- P9 compat L2 KVM guest fails to boot as expected
TCG pSeries Guest
=================
- P11 (default) pSeries guest boots fine
ABI Extensibility Testing (struct size 32, extra member)
=========================================================
- Newer struct on QEMU, older kernel -> works (kernel returns -E2BIG,
QEMU retries with correct size)
- New struct on Linux kernel, older QEMU -> works (kernel zero-pads
trailing fields, QEMU gets correct data)
With this series, nested guests boot successfully in configurations where
they previously failed due to compatibility mismatches.
Related QEMU series:
====================
QEMU v5 series:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260804182914.83091-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
Previous QEMU versions:
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260701052341.62289-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260616113915.25589-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260502140021.69712-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260430061333.37905-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
Previous versions:
==================
v7: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20260806170645.11892-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
v6: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20260804180705.59160-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
v5: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20260701051409.51820-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20260616123314.82721-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20260522152744.55251-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20260513100755.83195-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20260430054906.94431-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
References:
===========
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260714175432.86388-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
Amit Machhiwal (4):
KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Implement compat CPU capability retrieval for KVM
on PowerVM
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add support for compat CPU capabilities for KVM
on PowerNV
KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 18 ++++++
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 3 +
6 files changed, 245 insertions(+)
base-commit: f9a2394a23482bfd330911e9c8295b71724feacd
prerequisite-patch-id: 7755786f0e4f415e47065ff1972765008727fe10
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 1/4] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl
2026-08-07 17:24 [PATCH v8 0/4] KVM: PPC: Expose CPU compatibility modes for nested guests Amit Machhiwal
@ 2026-08-07 17:24 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 1:00 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Implement compat CPU capability retrieval for KVM on PowerVM Amit Machhiwal
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Amit Machhiwal @ 2026-08-07 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev, Madhavan Srinivasan
Cc: Vaibhav Jain, Amit Machhiwal, Anushree Mathur, Paolo Bonzini,
Nicholas Piggin, Michael Ellerman, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP),
Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, Ritesh Harjani, kvm, linux-kernel,
linux-doc, Gautam Menghani
Introduce a new capability and ioctl to expose CPU compatibility modes
supported by the host processor for nested guests.
On IBM POWER systems, newer processor generations (N) can operate in
compatibility modes corresponding to earlier generations, like (N-1) and
(N-2). This is particularly relevant for nested virtualization, where
nested KVM guests may need to run with a specific processor compatibility
level.
Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS capability and the corresponding
KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS vm ioctl. The ioctl returns a bitmap describing
the compatibility modes supported by the host in respective bit numbers,
allowing userspace (e.g., QEMU) to select an appropriate compatibility
level when configuring nested KVM guests.
The ioctl handling is added in kvm_arch_vm_ioctl() and retrieves host
CPU compatibility capabilities via a PowerPC-specific backend
implementation when available.
The struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps places the 'size' field first so it can
be read alone via get_user() before copy_struct_from_user() is called,
avoiding pointer arithmetic to locate the size field.
The ioctl is defined using _IO so the ioctl number remains stable even if
the struct grows in future versions. It uses copy_struct_from_user() and
copy_struct_to_user() to provide forward- and backward-compatible
extensibility: older userspace passing a smaller struct to a newer kernel
gets zero-padded trailing fields. Newer userspace passing a larger struct to
an older kernel (usize > ksize) succeeds if trailing bytes are zero (the
kernel reports back min(usize, ksize) as the filled size); if trailing bytes
are non-zero, the kernel writes back ksize into host_caps.size and returns
-E2BIG so userspace can retry with the correct size.
KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS_SIZE_VER0 is defined as a frozen integer constant
(24) marking the size of the initial struct version, used as the
minimum floor for size field validation, similar to other versioned
struct interfaces in the kernel.
The 'flags' field is reserved for future use. The kernel rejects any
call where flags is non-zero with -EINVAL, preventing garbage values
from being baked into ABI permanently.
The ioctl returns appropriate error codes: E2BIG if usize exceeds
PAGE_SIZE, or if new userspace provides a larger struct with non-zero
trailing bytes (with ksize written back into host_caps.size for the
retry); EINVAL for an invalid size or non-zero reserved fields; EFAULT
for failed copy operations; and ENOTTY if the backend doesn't implement
get_compat_caps.
Suggested-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
---
Changes in this version:
- Add PAGE_SIZE guard after get_user() to bound the check_zeroed_user()
scan in the usize > ksize path [Ritesh]
- Drop manual usize > sizeof(host_caps) pre-check; delegate entirely to
copy_struct_from_user() which succeeds on zero trailing bytes and
returns -E2BIG only on non-zero trailing bytes; handle -E2BIG with
ksize writeback and -EFAULT escalation if put_user() fails [Ritesh]
- Fix host_caps.size on success path: use min_t(u64, usize,
sizeof(host_caps)) so new userspace with zero trailing bytes gets back
the number of bytes the kernel actually populated, not usize [Ritesh]
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 8 +++
arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 3 ++
4 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
index 0953f2daa466..169ea6a7fbad 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
@@ -319,6 +319,7 @@ struct kvmppc_ops {
bool (*hash_v3_possible)(void);
int (*create_vm_debugfs)(struct kvm *kvm);
int (*create_vcpu_debugfs)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct dentry *debugfs_dentry);
+ int (*get_compat_caps)(struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps *host_caps);
};
extern struct kvmppc_ops *kvmppc_hv_ops;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 077c5437f521..19e53d5ae540 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -437,6 +437,14 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
__u64 behaviour_mask; /* valid bits in behaviour */
};
+/* For KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS */
+struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps {
+ __u64 size; /* Size of this structure */
+ __u64 flags; /* Reserved for future use */
+ __u64 compat_capabilities; /* Capabilities supported by the host */
+};
+#define KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS_SIZE_VER0 24 /* sizeof first published struct */
+
/*
* Values for character and character_mask.
* These are identical to the values used by H_GET_CPU_CHARACTERISTICS.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index b6b83fe3233f..14a661a88d4e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -703,6 +703,13 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
}
}
break;
+#if defined(CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE)
+ case KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS:
+ r = 0;
+ if (hv_enabled && kvmhv_on_pseries())
+ r = 1;
+ break;
+#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE */
default:
r = 0;
break;
@@ -2469,6 +2476,77 @@ int kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
r = kvm->arch.kvm_ops->svm_off(kvm);
break;
}
+ case KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS: {
+ struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps host_caps = {};
+ u64 usize;
+
+ /*
+ * Read the size field first to drive copy_struct_from_user.
+ * size must be the first field of the struct.
+ */
+ r = -EFAULT;
+ if (get_user(usize, (__u64 __user *)argp))
+ goto out;
+
+ r = -E2BIG;
+ if (unlikely(usize > PAGE_SIZE))
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
+ * Enforce a minimum: reject buffers smaller than the initial
+ * struct version (VER0). This allows old userspace compiled
+ * against the original struct to still work on a newer kernel
+ * that has grown the struct with appended fields.
+ */
+ r = -EINVAL;
+ if (usize < KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS_SIZE_VER0)
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
+ * copy_struct_from_user() handles forward/backward compat:
+ * usize == ksize: verbatim copy
+ * usize < ksize: zero-pad trailing (old userspace, new kernel)
+ * usize > ksize: succeed iff trailing bytes are zero, else -E2BIG
+ */
+ r = copy_struct_from_user(&host_caps, sizeof(host_caps),
+ argp, usize);
+ if (r) {
+ /*
+ * New userspace with a larger struct called an older
+ * kernel. Write back ksize in host_caps.size so
+ * userspace knows which older struct to retry with,
+ * then fail with -E2BIG.
+ */
+ if (r == -E2BIG)
+ if (put_user((__u64)sizeof(host_caps),
+ (__u64 __user *)argp))
+ r = -EFAULT;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* Reserved fields must be zero */
+ r = -EINVAL;
+ if (host_caps.flags)
+ goto out;
+
+ r = -ENOTTY;
+ if (!kvm->arch.kvm_ops->get_compat_caps)
+ goto out;
+
+ r = kvm->arch.kvm_ops->get_compat_caps(&host_caps);
+ if (r)
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
+ * Report the number of bytes actually populated by the kernel,
+ * not usize: if new userspace passed a larger struct with zero
+ * trailing bytes, we only filled sizeof(host_caps) bytes.
+ */
+ host_caps.size = min_t(u64, usize, sizeof(host_caps));
+ r = copy_struct_to_user(argp, usize, &host_caps,
+ sizeof(host_caps), NULL);
+ break;
+ }
default: {
struct kvm *kvm = filp->private_data;
r = kvm->arch.kvm_ops->arch_vm_ioctl(filp, ioctl, arg);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index 419011097fa8..70e36e6a0ad4 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -997,6 +997,7 @@ struct kvm_enable_cap {
#define KVM_CAP_S390_KEYOP 247
#define KVM_CAP_S390_VSIE_ESAMODE 248
#define KVM_CAP_S390_HPAGE_2G 249
+#define KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS 250
struct kvm_irq_routing_irqchip {
__u32 irqchip;
@@ -1341,6 +1342,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_keyop {
/* Available with KVM_CAP_COUNTER_OFFSET */
#define KVM_ARM_SET_COUNTER_OFFSET _IOW(KVMIO, 0xb5, struct kvm_arm_counter_offset)
#define KVM_ARM_GET_REG_WRITABLE_MASKS _IOR(KVMIO, 0xb6, struct reg_mask_range)
+/* Available with KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS */
+#define KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS _IO(KVMIO, 0xb8)
/* ioctl for vm fd */
#define KVM_CREATE_DEVICE _IOWR(KVMIO, 0xe0, struct kvm_create_device)
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 2/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Implement compat CPU capability retrieval for KVM on PowerVM
2026-08-07 17:24 [PATCH v8 0/4] KVM: PPC: Expose CPU compatibility modes for nested guests Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl Amit Machhiwal
@ 2026-08-07 17:24 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add support for compat CPU capabilities for KVM on PowerNV Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl Amit Machhiwal
3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Amit Machhiwal @ 2026-08-07 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev, Madhavan Srinivasan
Cc: Vaibhav Jain, Amit Machhiwal, Anushree Mathur, Paolo Bonzini,
Nicholas Piggin, Michael Ellerman, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP),
Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, Ritesh Harjani, kvm, linux-kernel,
linux-doc, Gautam Menghani
On POWER systems, the host CPU may run in a compatibility mode (e.g., a
Power11 processor operating in Power10 compatibility mode). In such
cases, the effective CPU level exposed to guests differs from the
physical processor generation.
When running nested KVM guests, QEMU derives the host CPU type using
mfpvr(), which reflects the physical processor version. This can result
in a mismatch between the CPU model selected by QEMU and the
compatibility mode enforced by the host, leading to guest boot failures.
For example, booting a nested guest on a Power11 LPAR configured in
Power10 compatibility mode fails with:
KVM-NESTEDv2: couldn't set guest wide elements
[..KVM reg dump..]
This occurs because QEMU selects a CPU model corresponding to the
physical processor (via mfpvr()), while the host operates in a lower
compatibility mode. As a result, KVM rejects the requested compatibility
level during guest initialization.
On pseries nestedv2 systems, add support for retrieving host CPU
compatibility capabilities for nested guests on PowerVM. The capability
bitmap reflects the processor modes negotiated between the Power
hypervisor (L0) and the host partition (L1) via the
H_GUEST_GET_CAPABILITIES hcall, but is retrieved from the cached
nested_capabilities value populated during module initialization,
avoiding repeated hypervisor calls. A WARN_ON_ONCE() flags the
unexpected case where nested_capabilities is zero on a nestedv2 system.
The implementation defines KVM-specific capability constants
(KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER9/10/11), masks unsupported bits, and exposes
the result through the KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl.
Hook the implementation into the Book3S HV kvmppc_ops so that it can be
invoked by the generic KVM ioctl handling code.
Suggested-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 10 ++++++++++
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 19e53d5ae540..913a64b901a3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -445,6 +445,16 @@ struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps {
};
#define KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS_SIZE_VER0 24 /* sizeof first published struct */
+/*
+ * Capability bits for compat_capabilities field in kvm_ppc_compat_caps.
+ * These bits indicate which processor compatibility modes are supported.
+ */
+#define KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER9 (1ULL << 62)
+#define KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER10 (1ULL << 61)
+#define KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER11 (1ULL << 60)
+#define KVM_PPC_COMPAT_BITMASK (KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER9 | \
+ KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER10 | \
+ KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER11)
/*
* Values for character and character_mask.
* These are identical to the values used by H_GET_CPU_CHARACTERISTICS.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index f9380ef65750..152cd08a5b38 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -6523,6 +6523,25 @@ static bool kvmppc_hash_v3_possible(void)
return true;
}
+
+static int kvmppc_get_compat_caps(struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps *host_caps)
+{
+ unsigned long capabilities = 0;
+ long rc = -EINVAL;
+
+ if (kvmhv_on_pseries()) {
+ if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2()) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!nested_capabilities);
+ capabilities = nested_capabilities;
+ rc = 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ host_caps->compat_capabilities = capabilities & KVM_PPC_COMPAT_BITMASK;
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
static struct kvmppc_ops kvm_ops_hv = {
.get_sregs = kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_sregs_hv,
.set_sregs = kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs_hv,
@@ -6565,6 +6584,7 @@ static struct kvmppc_ops kvm_ops_hv = {
.hash_v3_possible = kvmppc_hash_v3_possible,
.create_vcpu_debugfs = kvmppc_arch_create_vcpu_debugfs_hv,
.create_vm_debugfs = kvmppc_arch_create_vm_debugfs_hv,
+ .get_compat_caps = kvmppc_get_compat_caps,
};
static int kvm_init_subcore_bitmap(void)
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 3/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add support for compat CPU capabilities for KVM on PowerNV
2026-08-07 17:24 [PATCH v8 0/4] KVM: PPC: Expose CPU compatibility modes for nested guests Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Implement compat CPU capability retrieval for KVM on PowerVM Amit Machhiwal
@ 2026-08-07 17:24 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl Amit Machhiwal
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Amit Machhiwal @ 2026-08-07 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev, Madhavan Srinivasan
Cc: Vaibhav Jain, Amit Machhiwal, Anushree Mathur, Paolo Bonzini,
Nicholas Piggin, Michael Ellerman, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP),
Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, Ritesh Harjani, kvm, linux-kernel,
linux-doc, Gautam Menghani
Currently, when booting a compatibility-mode KVM guest (L1) on a PowerNV
hypervisor (L0), the guest runs with the expected processor
compatibility level. However, when booting a nested KVM guest (L2)
inside the L1, QEMU derives the CPU model from the raw host PVR and
attempts to run the nested guest at that level, instead of honoring the
compatibility mode of the L1.
Extend host CPU compatibility capability reporting to support nested
virtualization on PowerNV systems (PAPR nested API v1).
For nested API v2 (PowerVM), compatibility capabilities are served from
the cached nested_capabilities value (populated at module init via
kvmhv_nested_init() using the H_GUEST_GET_CAPABILITIES hcall). This
information is not available on PowerNV systems.
For nested API v1, derive the compatibility capabilities from the L1
guest by reading the "cpu-version" property from the device tree, which
reflects the effective (logical) processor compatibility level. Map this
value to the corresponding compatibility capability bitmap using
KVM-specific constants.
The mapping is cumulative: a system running at a given compatibility
level is assumed to also support older generations down the supported
chain. Note that unlike KVM on PowerVM (nested API v2), KVM on PowerNV
currently does not strictly enforce older generation compatibility modes
for nested guests - the reported capabilities reflect what the host CPU
can present, not what the hypervisor independently validates.
Introduce a helper kvmppc_map_compat_capabilities() to translate CPU
version values into KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP bits using a fallthrough switch,
and integrate it into kvmppc_get_compat_caps(). The implementation
applies masking to ensure only supported processor modes are exposed.
This allows userspace to query host CPU compatibility modes on both
KVM on PowerVM and on PowerNV platforms via the KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS
ioctl.
Suggested-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 152cd08a5b38..4d0307f55e06 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -6523,20 +6523,56 @@ static bool kvmppc_hash_v3_possible(void)
return true;
}
+static int kvmppc_map_compat_capabilities(u32 cpu_version,
+ unsigned long *capabilities)
+{
+ switch (cpu_version) {
+ case PVR_ARCH_31_P11:
+ *capabilities |= KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER11;
+ fallthrough;
+ case PVR_ARCH_31:
+ *capabilities |= KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER10;
+ fallthrough;
+ case PVR_ARCH_300:
+ *capabilities |= KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER9;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
static int kvmppc_get_compat_caps(struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps *host_caps)
{
+ struct device_node *np;
unsigned long capabilities = 0;
long rc = -EINVAL;
+ u32 cpu_version = 0;
if (kvmhv_on_pseries()) {
if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2()) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(!nested_capabilities);
capabilities = nested_capabilities;
rc = 0;
+ } else {
+ for_each_node_by_type(np, "cpu") {
+ if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "cpu-version",
+ &cpu_version)) {
+ of_node_put(np);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!cpu_version)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ rc = kvmppc_map_compat_capabilities(cpu_version,
+ &capabilities);
}
}
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
+
host_caps->compat_capabilities = capabilities & KVM_PPC_COMPAT_BITMASK;
return rc;
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 4/4] KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl
2026-08-07 17:24 [PATCH v8 0/4] KVM: PPC: Expose CPU compatibility modes for nested guests Amit Machhiwal
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add support for compat CPU capabilities for KVM on PowerNV Amit Machhiwal
@ 2026-08-07 17:24 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 1:15 ` Ritesh Harjani
3 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Amit Machhiwal @ 2026-08-07 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev, Madhavan Srinivasan
Cc: Vaibhav Jain, Amit Machhiwal, Anushree Mathur, Paolo Bonzini,
Nicholas Piggin, Michael Ellerman, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP),
Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, Ritesh Harjani, kvm, linux-kernel,
linux-doc, Gautam Menghani
Add documentation for the KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl to the KVM API
documentation.
The ioctl exposes host processor compatibility modes supported for
nested KVM guests on PowerPC systems. The documentation covers error
code descriptions including E2BIG for forward compatibility, the
extensible size-based versioning contract using
KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS_SIZE_VER0, the rationale for rejecting non-zero
reserved fields to prevent ABI ambiguity, bit numbering clarification
for IBM MSB-0 convention, and KVM-specific capability bit constants.
Tested-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
---
Changes in this version:
- Update E2BIG description: document PAGE_SIZE guard as first case;
-E2BIG for usize > ksize is only returned when trailing bytes are
non-zero; zero trailing bytes now succeed [Ritesh]
- Rewrite versioning paragraph as three explicit cases to match the
corrected copy_struct_from_user() / copy_struct_to_user() contract,
including the usize > ksize zero-trailing-bytes success path [Ritesh]
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
index e3003a241d5b..e656d117cd0b 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
@@ -6566,6 +6566,95 @@ KVM_S390_KEYOP_SSKE
Sets the storage key for the guest address ``guest_addr`` to the key
specified in ``key``, returning the previous value in ``key``.
+4.145 KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS
+-----------------------------
+:Capability: KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS
+:Architectures: powerpc
+:Type: vm ioctl
+:Parameters: struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps (in/out)
+:Returns: 0 on success, negative value on failure
+
+Errors include:
+
+ ======== ============================================================
+ EFAULT if ``struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps`` cannot be read from or
+ written to userspace
+ EINVAL if the ``size`` field is smaller than
+ ``KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS_SIZE_VER0``, if the ``flags`` field
+ is non-zero, or if the backend fails to retrieve or map
+ CPU compatibility capabilities
+ E2BIG if ``size`` exceeds ``PAGE_SIZE`` (pathological input guard),
+ or if ``size`` is larger than the kernel's struct size and
+ the unknown trailing bytes are non-zero (new userspace on
+ old kernel with non-default fields set); in the latter case
+ the kernel writes back its own struct size into the ``size``
+ field so userspace can retry with the correct size
+ ENOTTY if the backend does not implement the ``get_compat_caps``
+ operation (e.g., on non-HV KVM implementations where the
+ required KVM operations are not available)
+ ======== ============================================================
+
+IBM POWER system server-based processors provide a compatibility mode feature
+where an Nth generation processor can operate in modes consistent with earlier
+generations such as (N-1) and (N-2).
+
+This ioctl provides userspace with information about the CPU compatibility modes
+supported by the current host processor for booting the nested KVM guests on
+KVM on PowerNV (nested API v1) and KVM on PowerVM (nested API v2) platforms.
+
+::
+
+ struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps {
+ __u64 size; /* Size of this structure */
+ __u64 flags; /* Reserved for future use, must be 0 */
+ __u64 compat_capabilities; /* Capabilities supported by the host */
+ };
+
+Before calling this ioctl, userspace must set the ``size`` field to
+``sizeof(struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps)`` and zero the ``flags`` field.
+The kernel rejects non-zero ``flags`` with ``-EINVAL`` to prevent
+uninitialized stack values from being silently accepted, keeping the
+field available for future use without ABI ambiguity.
+
+The ioctl uses ``copy_struct_from_user()`` and ``copy_struct_to_user()``
+to support extensible versioning across three cases:
+
+- If ``size`` is smaller than the kernel's struct size (old userspace,
+ new kernel), the kernel zero-pads the unknown trailing fields before
+ returning, and writes back ``size`` unchanged so userspace knows how
+ many bytes were filled.
+- If ``size`` equals the kernel's struct size, the struct is copied
+ verbatim.
+- If ``size`` is larger than the kernel's struct size (new userspace,
+ old kernel) and the unknown trailing bytes are all zero, the call
+ succeeds as if the sizes matched. If any trailing bytes are non-zero,
+ the kernel returns ``-E2BIG`` and writes back its own struct size into
+ the ``size`` field so userspace can retry with the correct size.
+
+``KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS_SIZE_VER0`` (24) is a frozen constant marking the
+size of the initial struct version.
+
+The ``compat_capabilities`` bit field describes the processor compatibility
+modes supported by the host. The following bits indicate support for specific
+processor modes (using IBM's MSB-0 convention where bit 0 is the most
+significant bit):
+
+- ``KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER9`` (bit 1) -- KVM guests can run in Power9 processor mode
+- ``KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER10`` (bit 2) -- KVM guests can run in Power10 processor mode
+- ``KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER11`` (bit 3) -- KVM guests can run in Power11 processor mode
+
+.. note::
+
+ The bit numbering above uses IBM's MSB-0 convention (bit 0 is the most
+ significant bit). In the actual implementation, these are defined as:
+
+ - ``KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER9`` = ``(1ULL << 62)``
+ - ``KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER10`` = ``(1ULL << 61)``
+ - ``KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER11`` = ``(1ULL << 60)``
+
+ Userspace should use the defined constants from ``<linux/kvm.h>`` rather
+ than hardcoding bit positions.
+
.. _kvm_run:
5. The kvm_run structure
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl Amit Machhiwal
@ 2026-08-07 17:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 1:00 ` Ritesh Harjani
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-08-07 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amit Machhiwal; +Cc: kvm
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS is advertised as supported on pSeries HV KVM, but the KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl backend implementation is missing, leading to unconditional -ENOTTY failure.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v8 1/4] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl ---
commit 3fd26ec35303a5e885f7551c23267fe626ae5e16
Author: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl
This commit introduces the KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS capability and the
KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl to expose CPU compatibility modes. It routes
the ioctl to a backend-specific get_compat_caps implementation.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 00302399fc37b..2fe4ea0ca4ff1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -697,6 +697,13 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
[ ... ]
> +#if defined(CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE)
> + case KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS:
> + r = 0;
> + if (hv_enabled && kvmhv_on_pseries())
> + r = 1;
> + break;
> +#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV_POSSIBLE */
[Severity: High]
Since kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension() advertises this capability as supported
solely based on platform checks, will userspace expect the ioctl to work?
Looking at the ioctl implementation below, it seems to fail if the backend
is missing. Should this capability check also verify that
kvm->arch.kvm_ops->get_compat_caps is implemented so that it doesn't
advertise a capability the kernel cannot fulfill?
[ ... ]
> @@ -2463,6 +2470,77 @@ int kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
[ ... ]
> + /* Reserved fields must be zero */
> + r = -EINVAL;
> + if (host_caps.flags)
> + goto out;
> +
> + r = -ENOTTY;
> + if (!kvm->arch.kvm_ops->get_compat_caps)
> + goto out;
> +
> + r = kvm->arch.kvm_ops->get_compat_caps(&host_caps);
> + if (r)
> + goto out;
[Severity: High]
Does this ioctl currently return -ENOTTY on all platforms?
I don't see any backend implementing get_compat_caps in this patch. If
userspace probes KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and gets a positive result, won't
it be unexpectedly broken by receiving -ENOTTY when attempting to use the
ioctl?
Would it be safer to introduce the capability advertisement in the same
patch that wires up the actual backend implementation?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807172433.82045-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl Amit Machhiwal
@ 2026-08-07 17:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 1:15 ` Ritesh Harjani
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-08-07 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amit Machhiwal; +Cc: kvm
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] The documentation inaccurately describes how the extensible struct versioning handles trailing fields and truncation.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] A userspace-reachable WARN_ON_ONCE in kvmppc_get_compat_caps allows unprivileged users to panic the host if panic_on_warn is set.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v8 4/4] KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl ---
commit 991bf5faa645caad474f6369b275de7617351fd0
Author: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl
Add documentation for the KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl to the KVM API
documentation. The ioctl exposes host processor compatibility modes supported
for nested KVM guests on PowerPC systems. The documentation covers error
code descriptions including E2BIG for forward compatibility.
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index e3003a241d5b0..e656d117cd0b1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -6566,6 +6566,95 @@ KVM_S390_KEYOP_SSKE
> Sets the storage key for the guest address ``guest_addr`` to the key
> specified in ``key``, returning the previous value in ``key``.
>
> +4.145 KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS
> +-----------------------------
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this ioctl handler allow unprivileged
users to panic the host?
Looking at kvmppc_get_compat_caps() in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c:
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c:kvmppc_get_compat_caps() {
if (kvmhv_on_pseries()) {
if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2()) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(!nested_capabilities);
capabilities = nested_capabilities;
[ ... ]
}
An unprivileged user with access to /dev/kvm can open a VM file descriptor
and call the KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl. If the system is a nested guest
(kvmhv_is_nestedv2() is true) but the parent hypervisor advertised no
capabilities (nested_capabilities is 0), the ioctl handler directly triggers
a WARN_ON_ONCE(!nested_capabilities).
This can occur naturally if plpar_guest_set_capabilities(0, 0) succeeds
during kvmhv_nested_init(). This directly violates the KVM subsystem
guidelines which explicitly forbid userspace-reachable WARN_ON assertions,
as it can cause a host kernel panic (Denial of Service) if panic_on_warn is
set.
[ ... ]
> +The ioctl uses ``copy_struct_from_user()`` and ``copy_struct_to_user()``
> +to support extensible versioning across three cases:
> +
> +- If ``size`` is smaller than the kernel's struct size (old userspace,
> + new kernel), the kernel zero-pads the unknown trailing fields before
> + returning, and writes back ``size`` unchanged so userspace knows how
> + many bytes were filled.
[Severity: Medium]
Does this documentation accurately reflect the UAPI contract for struct padding
and truncation on the return path?
The documentation incorrectly states that if the userspace struct is smaller,
the kernel "zero-pads the unknown trailing fields before returning". This
misleadingly implies it pads the userspace buffer (which would be a buffer
overflow). In reality, the kernel strictly truncates trailing fields on output
to userspace using copy_struct_to_user().
Additionally, it fails to document that when userspace provides a larger
struct with zeroed trailing bytes, the kernel actively mutates the userspace
'size' field on success (via host_caps.size = min_t(...)) to reflect the
kernel's smaller struct size.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807172433.82045-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com?part=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Implement compat CPU capability retrieval for KVM on PowerVM
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Implement compat CPU capability retrieval for KVM on PowerVM Amit Machhiwal
@ 2026-08-07 17:39 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-08-07 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amit Machhiwal; +Cc: kvm
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS is unconditionally advertised on all pseries hosts, but the corresponding ioctl fails on non-nestedv2 hosts.
- [Medium] kvmppc_get_compat_caps returns -EINVAL for unsupported configurations instead of -ENOTTY or -EOPNOTSUPP.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v8 2/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Implement compat CPU capability retrieval for KVM on PowerVM ---
commit 73749763b436fd33b42f2ac5536c1c5a4bf826ad
Author: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Implement compat CPU capability retrieval for KVM on PowerVM
This commit implements the retrieval of host CPU compatibility capabilities
for nested KVM guests on PowerVM. It defines KVM-specific capability constants
and exposes the cached nested capabilities via the KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS
ioctl.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 61dbeea317f3b..8799124b80960 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -6510,6 +6510,25 @@ static bool kvmppc_hash_v3_possible(void)
> return true;
> }
>
> +
> +static int kvmppc_get_compat_caps(struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps *host_caps)
> +{
> + unsigned long capabilities = 0;
> + long rc = -EINVAL;
[Severity: Medium]
Should this return -ENOTTY or -EOPNOTSUPP instead of -EINVAL when the
configuration is unsupported?
-EINVAL conventionally indicates invalid userspace arguments rather than a
lack of host support. This might complicate graceful fallback logic if
userspace cannot differentiate between malformed requests and missing features.
> +
> + if (kvmhv_on_pseries()) {
> + if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2()) {
[Severity: High]
If KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS returns 1 for all pseries hosts (including
nestedv1) in kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(), will failing this ioctl here
on non-nestedv2 hosts break userspace?
Userspace might rely on the capability advertisement and fail unexpectedly
when the ioctl returns an error instead of succeeding with empty or base
capabilities.
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!nested_capabilities);
> + capabilities = nested_capabilities;
> + rc = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + host_caps->compat_capabilities = capabilities & KVM_PPC_COMPAT_BITMASK;
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807172433.82045-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com?part=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:34 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-08-08 1:00 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-08-08 15:47 ` Amit Machhiwal
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ritesh Harjani @ 2026-08-08 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amit Machhiwal, linuxppc-dev, Madhavan Srinivasan
Cc: Vaibhav Jain, Amit Machhiwal, Anushree Mathur, Paolo Bonzini,
Nicholas Piggin, Michael Ellerman, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP),
Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-doc,
Gautam Menghani
Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Introduce a new capability and ioctl to expose CPU compatibility modes
> supported by the host processor for nested guests.
>
> On IBM POWER systems, newer processor generations (N) can operate in
> compatibility modes corresponding to earlier generations, like (N-1) and
> (N-2). This is particularly relevant for nested virtualization, where
> nested KVM guests may need to run with a specific processor compatibility
> level.
>
> Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS capability and the corresponding
> KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS vm ioctl. The ioctl returns a bitmap describing
> the compatibility modes supported by the host in respective bit numbers,
> allowing userspace (e.g., QEMU) to select an appropriate compatibility
> level when configuring nested KVM guests.
>
> The ioctl handling is added in kvm_arch_vm_ioctl() and retrieves host
> CPU compatibility capabilities via a PowerPC-specific backend
> implementation when available.
>
> The struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps places the 'size' field first so it can
> be read alone via get_user() before copy_struct_from_user() is called,
> avoiding pointer arithmetic to locate the size field.
>
> The ioctl is defined using _IO so the ioctl number remains stable even if
> the struct grows in future versions. It uses copy_struct_from_user() and
> copy_struct_to_user() to provide forward- and backward-compatible
> extensibility: older userspace passing a smaller struct to a newer kernel
> gets zero-padded trailing fields. Newer userspace passing a larger struct to
> an older kernel (usize > ksize) succeeds if trailing bytes are zero (the
> kernel reports back min(usize, ksize) as the filled size); if trailing bytes
> are non-zero, the kernel writes back ksize into host_caps.size and returns
> -E2BIG so userspace can retry with the correct size.
>
> KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS_SIZE_VER0 is defined as a frozen integer constant
> (24) marking the size of the initial struct version, used as the
> minimum floor for size field validation, similar to other versioned
> struct interfaces in the kernel.
>
> The 'flags' field is reserved for future use. The kernel rejects any
> call where flags is non-zero with -EINVAL, preventing garbage values
> from being baked into ABI permanently.
>
> The ioctl returns appropriate error codes: E2BIG if usize exceeds
> PAGE_SIZE, or if new userspace provides a larger struct with non-zero
> trailing bytes (with ksize written back into host_caps.size for the
> retry); EINVAL for an invalid size or non-zero reserved fields; EFAULT
> for failed copy operations; and ENOTTY if the backend doesn't implement
> get_compat_caps.
>
> Suggested-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes in this version:
> - Add PAGE_SIZE guard after get_user() to bound the check_zeroed_user()
> scan in the usize > ksize path [Ritesh]
> - Drop manual usize > sizeof(host_caps) pre-check; delegate entirely to
> copy_struct_from_user() which succeeds on zero trailing bytes and
> returns -E2BIG only on non-zero trailing bytes; handle -E2BIG with
> ksize writeback and -EFAULT escalation if put_user() fails [Ritesh]
> - Fix host_caps.size on success path: use min_t(u64, usize,
> sizeof(host_caps)) so new userspace with zero trailing bytes gets back
> the number of bytes the kernel actually populated, not usize [Ritesh]
>
Thanks for addressing them!
The only remaining comments from Sashiko now are because, it cannot find
the implementation of ->get_compat_caps() since it is in the next patch.
So as for this patch, the changes looks good to me. Please feel free to
add:
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 8 +++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 3 ++
> 4 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:37 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-08-08 1:15 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-08-08 15:54 ` Amit Machhiwal
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ritesh Harjani @ 2026-08-08 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amit Machhiwal, linuxppc-dev, Madhavan Srinivasan
Cc: Vaibhav Jain, Amit Machhiwal, Anushree Mathur, Paolo Bonzini,
Nicholas Piggin, Michael Ellerman, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP),
Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, kvm, linux-kernel, linux-doc,
Gautam Menghani
Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Add documentation for the KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl to the KVM API
> documentation.
>
> The ioctl exposes host processor compatibility modes supported for
> nested KVM guests on PowerPC systems. The documentation covers error
> code descriptions including E2BIG for forward compatibility, the
> extensible size-based versioning contract using
> KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS_SIZE_VER0, the rationale for rejecting non-zero
> reserved fields to prevent ABI ambiguity, bit numbering clarification
> for IBM MSB-0 convention, and KVM-specific capability bit constants.
>
> Tested-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes in this version:
> - Update E2BIG description: document PAGE_SIZE guard as first case;
> -E2BIG for usize > ksize is only returned when trailing bytes are
> non-zero; zero trailing bytes now succeed [Ritesh]
> - Rewrite versioning paragraph as three explicit cases to match the
> corrected copy_struct_from_user() / copy_struct_to_user() contract,
> including the usize > ksize zero-trailing-bytes success path [Ritesh]
>
> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index e3003a241d5b..e656d117cd0b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -6566,6 +6566,95 @@ KVM_S390_KEYOP_SSKE
> Sets the storage key for the guest address ``guest_addr`` to the key
> specified in ``key``, returning the previous value in ``key``.
>
> +4.145 KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS
> +-----------------------------
> +:Capability: KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS
> +:Architectures: powerpc
> +:Type: vm ioctl
> +:Parameters: struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps (in/out)
> +:Returns: 0 on success, negative value on failure
> +
> +Errors include:
> +
> + ======== ============================================================
> + EFAULT if ``struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps`` cannot be read from or
> + written to userspace
> + EINVAL if the ``size`` field is smaller than
> + ``KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS_SIZE_VER0``, if the ``flags`` field
> + is non-zero, or if the backend fails to retrieve or map
> + CPU compatibility capabilities
> + E2BIG if ``size`` exceeds ``PAGE_SIZE`` (pathological input guard),
> + or if ``size`` is larger than the kernel's struct size and
> + the unknown trailing bytes are non-zero (new userspace on
> + old kernel with non-default fields set); in the latter case
> + the kernel writes back its own struct size into the ``size``
> + field so userspace can retry with the correct size
> + ENOTTY if the backend does not implement the ``get_compat_caps``
> + operation (e.g., on non-HV KVM implementations where the
> + required KVM operations are not available)
> + ======== ============================================================
> +
> +IBM POWER system server-based processors provide a compatibility mode feature
> +where an Nth generation processor can operate in modes consistent with earlier
> +generations such as (N-1) and (N-2).
> +
> +This ioctl provides userspace with information about the CPU compatibility modes
> +supported by the current host processor for booting the nested KVM guests on
> +KVM on PowerNV (nested API v1) and KVM on PowerVM (nested API v2) platforms.
> +
> +::
> +
> + struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps {
> + __u64 size; /* Size of this structure */
> + __u64 flags; /* Reserved for future use, must be 0 */
> + __u64 compat_capabilities; /* Capabilities supported by the host */
> + };
> +
> +Before calling this ioctl, userspace must set the ``size`` field to
> +``sizeof(struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps)`` and zero the ``flags`` field.
> +The kernel rejects non-zero ``flags`` with ``-EINVAL`` to prevent
> +uninitialized stack values from being silently accepted, keeping the
> +field available for future use without ABI ambiguity.
> +
> +The ioctl uses ``copy_struct_from_user()`` and ``copy_struct_to_user()``
> +to support extensible versioning across three cases:
> +
> +- If ``size`` is smaller than the kernel's struct size (old userspace,
> + new kernel), the kernel zero-pads the unknown trailing fields before
> + returning, and writes back ``size`` unchanged so userspace knows how
> + many bytes were filled.
I agree with Sashiko comment here. This para is slightly misleading.
This sounds like we are zero padding to userspace struct before
returning. Whereas what we intend to say here is, when we copy user
struct into kernel (copy_struct_from_user()), we zero pad the trailing
bytes in kernel's struct.
> +- If ``size`` equals the kernel's struct size, the struct is copied
> + verbatim.
> +- If ``size`` is larger than the kernel's struct size (new userspace,
> + old kernel) and the unknown trailing bytes are all zero, the call
> + succeeds as if the sizes matched. If any trailing bytes are non-zero,
> + the kernel returns ``-E2BIG`` and writes back its own struct size into
> + the ``size`` field so userspace can retry with the correct size.
>
BTW - I anyway feel this is too much. We can get rid of all 3 points
which explains how struct copying is working. We have more than enough
documentation around how copy_struct_{from|to}_user() works and we have
also added the comments around the code. So I think this is just
unnecessary.
We can just say:
+The ioctl uses ``copy_struct_from_user()`` and ``copy_struct_to_user()``
+to support extensible versioning.
With that taken care, please feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl
2026-08-08 1:00 ` Ritesh Harjani
@ 2026-08-08 15:47 ` Amit Machhiwal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Amit Machhiwal @ 2026-08-08 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ritesh Harjani
Cc: Amit Machhiwal, linuxppc-dev, Madhavan Srinivasan, Vaibhav Jain,
Anushree Mathur, Paolo Bonzini, Nicholas Piggin, Michael Ellerman,
Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP), Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, kvm,
linux-kernel, linux-doc, Gautam Menghani
On 2026/08/08 06:30 AM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > Introduce a new capability and ioctl to expose CPU compatibility modes
> > supported by the host processor for nested guests.
> >
> > On IBM POWER systems, newer processor generations (N) can operate in
> > compatibility modes corresponding to earlier generations, like (N-1) and
> > (N-2). This is particularly relevant for nested virtualization, where
> > nested KVM guests may need to run with a specific processor compatibility
> > level.
> >
> > Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS capability and the corresponding
> > KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS vm ioctl. The ioctl returns a bitmap describing
> > the compatibility modes supported by the host in respective bit numbers,
> > allowing userspace (e.g., QEMU) to select an appropriate compatibility
> > level when configuring nested KVM guests.
> >
> > The ioctl handling is added in kvm_arch_vm_ioctl() and retrieves host
> > CPU compatibility capabilities via a PowerPC-specific backend
> > implementation when available.
> >
> > The struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps places the 'size' field first so it can
> > be read alone via get_user() before copy_struct_from_user() is called,
> > avoiding pointer arithmetic to locate the size field.
> >
> > The ioctl is defined using _IO so the ioctl number remains stable even if
> > the struct grows in future versions. It uses copy_struct_from_user() and
> > copy_struct_to_user() to provide forward- and backward-compatible
> > extensibility: older userspace passing a smaller struct to a newer kernel
> > gets zero-padded trailing fields. Newer userspace passing a larger struct to
> > an older kernel (usize > ksize) succeeds if trailing bytes are zero (the
> > kernel reports back min(usize, ksize) as the filled size); if trailing bytes
> > are non-zero, the kernel writes back ksize into host_caps.size and returns
> > -E2BIG so userspace can retry with the correct size.
> >
> > KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS_SIZE_VER0 is defined as a frozen integer constant
> > (24) marking the size of the initial struct version, used as the
> > minimum floor for size field validation, similar to other versioned
> > struct interfaces in the kernel.
> >
> > The 'flags' field is reserved for future use. The kernel rejects any
> > call where flags is non-zero with -EINVAL, preventing garbage values
> > from being baked into ABI permanently.
> >
> > The ioctl returns appropriate error codes: E2BIG if usize exceeds
> > PAGE_SIZE, or if new userspace provides a larger struct with non-zero
> > trailing bytes (with ksize written back into host_caps.size for the
> > retry); EINVAL for an invalid size or non-zero reserved fields; EFAULT
> > for failed copy operations; and ENOTTY if the backend doesn't implement
> > get_compat_caps.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
> > Tested-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
> > Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in this version:
> > - Add PAGE_SIZE guard after get_user() to bound the check_zeroed_user()
> > scan in the usize > ksize path [Ritesh]
> > - Drop manual usize > sizeof(host_caps) pre-check; delegate entirely to
> > copy_struct_from_user() which succeeds on zero trailing bytes and
> > returns -E2BIG only on non-zero trailing bytes; handle -E2BIG with
> > ksize writeback and -EFAULT escalation if put_user() fails [Ritesh]
> > - Fix host_caps.size on success path: use min_t(u64, usize,
> > sizeof(host_caps)) so new userspace with zero trailing bytes gets back
> > the number of bytes the kernel actually populated, not usize [Ritesh]
> >
>
> Thanks for addressing them!
> The only remaining comments from Sashiko now are because, it cannot find
> the implementation of ->get_compat_caps() since it is in the next patch.
Yes, correct.
>
> So as for this patch, the changes looks good to me. Please feel free to
> add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Thanks for the review, Ritesh! Will carry the Reviewed-by in v9.
~Amit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl
2026-08-08 1:15 ` Ritesh Harjani
@ 2026-08-08 15:54 ` Amit Machhiwal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Amit Machhiwal @ 2026-08-08 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ritesh Harjani
Cc: Amit Machhiwal, linuxppc-dev, Madhavan Srinivasan, Vaibhav Jain,
Anushree Mathur, Paolo Bonzini, Nicholas Piggin, Michael Ellerman,
Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP), Jonathan Corbet, Shuah Khan, kvm,
linux-kernel, linux-doc, Gautam Menghani
On 2026/08/08 06:45 AM, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > Add documentation for the KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl to the KVM API
> > documentation.
<snip>
> > +
> > +The ioctl uses ``copy_struct_from_user()`` and ``copy_struct_to_user()``
> > +to support extensible versioning across three cases:
> > +
> > +- If ``size`` is smaller than the kernel's struct size (old userspace,
> > + new kernel), the kernel zero-pads the unknown trailing fields before
> > + returning, and writes back ``size`` unchanged so userspace knows how
> > + many bytes were filled.
>
> I agree with Sashiko comment here. This para is slightly misleading.
> This sounds like we are zero padding to userspace struct before
> returning. Whereas what we intend to say here is, when we copy user
> struct into kernel (copy_struct_from_user()), we zero pad the trailing
> bytes in kernel's struct.
>
> > +- If ``size`` equals the kernel's struct size, the struct is copied
> > + verbatim.
> > +- If ``size`` is larger than the kernel's struct size (new userspace,
> > + old kernel) and the unknown trailing bytes are all zero, the call
> > + succeeds as if the sizes matched. If any trailing bytes are non-zero,
> > + the kernel returns ``-E2BIG`` and writes back its own struct size into
> > + the ``size`` field so userspace can retry with the correct size.
> >
>
> BTW - I anyway feel this is too much. We can get rid of all 3 points
> which explains how struct copying is working. We have more than enough
> documentation around how copy_struct_{from|to}_user() works and we have
> also added the comments around the code. So I think this is just
> unnecessary.
Agreed on both counts. I'll drop the three-bullet block in the next
version - v9 is on the way!
>
> We can just say:
> +The ioctl uses ``copy_struct_from_user()`` and ``copy_struct_to_user()``
> +to support extensible versioning.
Sure, makes sense.
>
>
> With that taken care, please feel free to add:
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Thanks again for the detailed reviews on the series. Will carry the R-b
in v9.
~Amit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-08 15:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-07 17:24 [PATCH v8 0/4] KVM: PPC: Expose CPU compatibility modes for nested guests Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 1:00 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-08-08 15:47 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Implement compat CPU capability retrieval for KVM on PowerVM Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add support for compat CPU capabilities for KVM on PowerNV Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:24 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-07 17:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 1:15 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-08-08 15:54 ` Amit Machhiwal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox