Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>,
	chenhuacai@kernel.org, zhaotianrui@loongson.cn
Cc: cui.tao@linux.dev, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@xen0n.name, nagachaithanya9911@gmail.com,
	Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] LoongArch: KVM: Reject repeated PCH-PIC CTRL_INIT
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 16:01:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3747972d-0133-4542-a314-40ff1c688937@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd455df4-49e8-c80c-a5cc-b0feabeb3262@loongson.cn>

Hi,Bibo

在 2026/10/16 9:31, Bibo Mao 写道:
> 
> 
> On 2026/10/16 上午7:46, Tao Cui wrote:
>> From: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
>>
>> KVM_DEV_LOONGARCH_PCH_PIC_CTRL_INIT has no guard against repeated
>> invocation: every call overwrites pch_pic_base and registers the same
>> kvm_io_device on the MMIO bus at the new address, while
>> kvm_pch_pic_destroy() unregisters only one bus range.  After a repeated
>> init, MMIO to the stale ranges computes its register offset against the
>> new base and silently reads 0 / drops writes, and the leftover bus
>> entries persist until the VM is destroyed.
>>
>> Reject repeated initialization with -EEXIST, using the initialized
>> state of the kvm_io_device as the indicator.  The check, the MMIO base
>> update and the bus registration are serialized by slots_lock, and the
>> real registration error is propagated instead of being replaced with
>> -EFAULT.
>>
>> Fixes: d206d9514873 ("LoongArch: KVM: Add PCHPIC user mode read and write functions")
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
>> ---
>>   arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c | 11 ++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c
>> index 51e4a6a39dc0..a4c35ed704be 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/intc/pch_pic.c
>> @@ -281,16 +281,21 @@ static int kvm_pch_pic_init(struct kvm_device *dev, u64 addr)
>>       struct kvm_io_device *device;
>>       struct loongarch_pch_pic *s = dev->kvm->arch.pch_pic;
>>   -    s->pch_pic_base = addr;
>>       device = &s->device;
>> +    mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>> +    if (s->device.ops) {
>> +        ret = -EEXIST;
>> +        goto out;
>> +    }
>> +    s->pch_pic_base = addr;
>>       /* init device by pch pic writing and reading ops */
>>       kvm_iodevice_init(device, &kvm_pch_pic_ops);
>> -    mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>>       /* register pch pic device */
>>       ret = kvm_io_bus_register_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, addr, PCH_PIC_SIZE, device);
>> +out:
>>       mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> one small nit, what to do if there is failure with kvm_io_bus_register_dev()?  clear s->pch_pic_base and  s->device.ops?
> 

I missed this.  You're right. On the failure path I should undo the
state set before kvm_io_bus_register_dev(). I'll fix that in the next
revision.

Thanks,
Tao

> Regards
> Bibo Mao
>>   -    return (ret < 0) ? -EFAULT : 0;
>> +    return ret;
>>   }
>>     /* used by user space to get or set pch pic registers */
>>
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-16  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-15 23:46 [PATCH v4 0/3] LoongArch: KVM: irqchip fixes Tao Cui
2026-10-15 23:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] LoongArch: KVM: Clear device pointer in irqchip destroy callbacks Tao Cui
2026-10-16  0:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  1:03   ` Bibo Mao
2026-10-15 23:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] LoongArch: KVM: Propagate real error code in kvm_pch_pic_create Tao Cui
2026-10-15 23:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] LoongArch: KVM: Reject repeated PCH-PIC CTRL_INIT Tao Cui
2026-10-15 23:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16  1:03   ` Bibo Mao
2026-10-16  1:31   ` Bibo Mao
2026-10-16  8:01     ` Tao Cui [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3747972d-0133-4542-a314-40ff1c688937@linux.dev \
    --to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=nagachaithanya9911@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhaotianrui@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox