public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] KVM: s390: pv: fix external interruption loop not always detected
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 10:21:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38deba59-ac91-0196-d7f0-e7846a7531b3@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230213085520.100756-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com>

On 2/13/23 09:55, Nico Boehr wrote:
> To determine whether the guest has caused an external interruption loop
> upon code 20 (external interrupt) intercepts, the ext_new_psw needs to
> be inspected to see whether external interrupts are enabled.
> 
> Under non-PV, ext_new_psw can simply be taken from guest lowcore. Under
> PV, KVM can only access the encrypted guest lowcore and hence the
> ext_new_psw must not be taken from guest lowcore.
> 
> handle_external_interrupt() incorrectly did that and hence was not able
> to reliably tell whether an external interruption loop is happening or
> not. False negatives cause spurious failures of my kvm-unit-test
> for extint loops[1] under PV.
> 
> Since code 20 is only caused under PV if and only if the guest's
> ext_new_psw is enabled for external interrupts, false positive detection
> of a external interruption loop can not happen.
> 
> Fix this issue by instead looking at the guest PSW in the state
> description. Since the PSW swap for external interrupt is done by the
> ultravisor before the intercept is caused, this reliably tells whether
> the guest is enabled for external interrupts in the ext_new_psw.
> 
> Also update the comments to explain better what is happening.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220812062151.1980937-4-nrb@linux.ibm.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-13  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-13  8:55 [PATCH v3 0/1] KVM: s390: pv: fix external interruption loop not always detected Nico Boehr
2023-02-13  8:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Nico Boehr
2023-02-13  9:06   ` Christian Borntraeger
2023-02-13  9:21   ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2023-02-13 12:00     ` Janosch Frank
2023-02-13 13:02       ` Nico Boehr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=38deba59-ac91-0196-d7f0-e7846a7531b3@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox